Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2014
THE THEME I PROPOSE TO TREAT HERE RUNS LIKE A PARALLEL tributary to the mainstream of Giovanni Sartori's theme: ‘We are living above and beyond our intelligence’. But while Sartori concentrates his attention on the pros and cons of ‘political engineering’ in the modern society, its feasibility and cost benefits, I concentrate on the question which can be summarily formulated as follows: ‘can modern political judgment itself, i.e. before it sets political engineering, or indeed policy-making, in motion, comprehend (in the double meaning of the expression) the issues upon which it should be exerted in their individual esotericism and in their collective array?’ But before starting to examine this question, I must make a few caveats.
1 Keohane, Robert O., Power ad Interdependence, Harvard University Press, 1977, p. 9.Google Scholar
2 Mény, Yves and Wright, Vincent (eds), The Politics of steel: Western Europe and the Steel Industry in the Criris Years (1974–1984), Berlin, Walter de Gruyter & Co, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Putnarn, Robert D., The Comparative Study of Political Elites, New Jersey, 1976.Google Scholar
4 Campanella, M., Between Rationality and Cognition, Turin, 1988, p. 178.Google Scholar