Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:34:05.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Science in the United States: The Discipline and the Profession

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

John Dreijmanis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

WRITINGS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE FREquently deal with either the discipline or the profession. There is also a tendency not to relate political science to national and international political, intellectual and educational developments. In this article political science is treated as a discipline and a profession and viewed to a more significant degree than is usually the case as the dependent variable rather than as an independent one. Although political science in the United States is being dealt with, and the emphasis is upon the post- 1945 period, it is worth remembering that the ‘content and style of political science in any country is no less international in character than it is national. At the very least differences in national styles (as well as content) are a function of international styles as the latter are mediated by national factors’. There is in the United States neither a single school of political science nor a unitary style or content.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Government and Opposition , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , 01 April 1983 , pp. 194 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © Government and Opposition Ltd 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Easton, David, ‘The International Character of National Political Science’, Canadian Political Science Association Bulletin, Vol. V, No. 3, 01 1976, pp. 1–2 Google Scholar.

2 Fries, Sylvia D., ‘Staatstheorie and the New American Science of Politics’, Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. XXXIV, No. 3, July-September 1973, p. 395 Google Scholar.

3 For an attempt to introduce a new term, see Dreijmanis, John, ‘Politology’, Politics, Vol. VIII, No. 2, 11 1973, p. 360 Google Scholar.

4 Somit, Albert and Tanenhaus, Joseph, The Development of American Political Science, Enlarged ed., New York, Irvington Publishers, 1982, p. 38 Google Scholar.

5 Waldo, Dwight, ‘Political Science: Tradition, Discipline, Profession, Science, Enterprise’, in Greenstein, Fred I. and Polsby, Nelson W. (eds.), Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 1, Reading, Mass., Addison‐Wesley Publishing Co., 1975, p. 32 Google Scholar.

6 Ibid., p. 20. See also Crick, Bernard, The American Science of Politics: Its Origins and Conditions, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1959, p. xv Google Scholar.

7 Somit and Tanenhaus, op. cit., p. 2.

8 Crick, Op. cit., p. 38.

9 Ibid., pp. 69–70. For a Marxist‐Leninist interpretation of the development of American political science, see Kalenski, W. G., Mocek, R. and Löwe, B. P., Politologie in den USA. Zur Kritik imperialistischer Machtkonzeptionen, Berlin, VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, 1971, especially pp. 13–76 Google Scholar.

10 Somit and Tanenhaus, Op. cit., p. 55.

11 Fermi’s, Laura Illustrious Immigrants: The Intellectual Migration from Europe 1930–41, 2nd ed., Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press, 1972 Google Scholar, is the most comprehensive account of who was who.

12 The best coverage of these developments is provided by Johnson, Alvin, ‘The Happy Valley’, Yale Review, Vol. 22, No. 4, 06 1933, pp. 678–90Google Scholar.

13 Waldo, , Political Science in the United States of America: A Trend Report, Paris, UNESCO, 1956, p. 53 Google Scholar.

14 Lasswell, Harold D., Psychopathology and Politics, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1930, p. 173 Google Scholar.

15 Crick, op. cit., p. 175.

16 Somit and Tanenhaus, Op. cit., p. 91.

17 Ibid., pp. 101–02.

18 Waldo, Political Science in the United States of America, p. 20.

19 Sorauf, Frank J., Perspectives on Political Science, Columbus, Ohio, Charles E. Merrill Books, 1966, pp. 13–14 Google Scholar.

20 Easton, , The Political System: An Inquiry Into the State of Political Science, 2nd ed., New York, Alfred A. Knopf, 1971, p. 6 Google Scholar.

21 Ibid., p. 5.

22 Ibid., p. 40.

23 Easton, , A Framework for Political Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice‐Hall, 1965, p. 7 Google Scholar.

24 Sibley, , ‘The Limitations of Behavioralism’, in Charlesworth, James C. (ed.), The Limits of Behavioralism in Political Science, Monograph 1, Philadelphia, American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1962, p. 71 Google Scholar. This and the subsequently cited AAPSS monographs capture quite well most of the disciplinary controversy.

25 Hacker, Andrew, ‘Mathematics and Political Science’, in Charlesworth, (ed.), Mathematics and the Social Sciences, Monograph 2, Philadelphia, American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1963, p. 69 Google Scholar.

26 Ibid., p. 73.

27 Ibid., p. 74.

28 Morgenthau, Hans J., ‘The Purpose of Political Science’, in Charlesworth, (ed.), A Design for Political Science: Scope, Objectives, and Methods, Monograph 6, Philadelphia, American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1966, p. 68 Google Scholar.

29 Ibid., p. 69.

30 Hacker, , The End of the American Era, New York, Atheneum Publishers, 1970, p. 204 Google Scholar.

31 Ibid., p. 197.

32 See especially Strauss, Leo, What Is Political Philosophy? and Other Studies, New York, Free Press of Glencoe, 1959 Google Scholar.

33 Easton, The Political System, p. x.

34 Somit and Tanenhaus, , American Political Science: A Profile of a Discipline, New York, Atherton Press, 1964, pp. 14–15 Google Scholar.

35 Roettger, Walter B., ‘The Discipline: What’s Right, What’s Wrong, and Who Cares?’, Paper presented at the 1978 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York, 30 08‐3 09 1978, p. 8 Google Scholar.

36 Somit, and Tanenhaus, , American Political Science, pp. 14–15 Google Scholar.

37 Roettger, Op. cit., p. 8.

38 Somit and Tanenhaus, American Political Science, pp. 16–17.

39 Roettger, op. cit., p. 9.

40 Somit and Tanenhaus, American Political Science, pp. 16–17.

41 Roettger, op. cit., p. 9.

42 Somit and Tanenhaus, The Development of American Political Science, p. 158.

43 Eulau, Heinz and March, James G. (eds), Political Science, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice‐Hall, 1969, pp. 67–8Google Scholar.

44 Ibid., p. 67; Almond, Gabriel A., ‘Political Theory and Political Science’, American Political Science Review, Vol. LX, No. 4, 12 1966, p. 869 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

45 Somit and Tanenhaus, American Political Science, p. 8; Eulau and March, op. cit., p. 77.

46 Turner, Henry A. and Hetrick, Carl C., ‘Political Activities and Party Affiliations of American Political Scientists’, Western Political Quarterly, Vol. XXV, No. 3, 09 1972, p. 363 Google Scholar.

47 Ibid..

48 Ibid., p. 369.

49 Wasby, Stephen L., Political Science—The Discipline and Its Dimensions: An Introduction, New York, Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1970, p. 255 Google Scholar.

50 Everett C. Ladd, Jr and Seymour M. Lipset, ‘Us: Characteristics of the American Political Science Community’, Paper presented at the 1973 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans, 4–8 September 1973, p. 88.

51 Ibid., p. 89.

52 Eulau and March, Op. cit., p. 83.

53 Ibid..

54 Ibid., p. 79.

55 Ladd and Lipset, ‘Us Revisited: A Survey Portait of the American Political Science Community’, Paper presented at the 1978 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York, 30 August‐3 September 1978, p. 24.

56 Report of the Committe for the Advancement of Teaching, American Political Science Association, Goals for Political Science, New York, William Sloane Associates, 1951, p. 255.

57 Key, V. O. Jr, ‘The State of the Discipline’, American Political Science Review, Vol. LII, No. 4, 12 1958, p. 970 Google Scholar.

58 Ibid..

59 Lane, Robert E., ‘To Nurture a Discipline’, American Political Science Review, Vol. LXVI, No. 1, 03 1972, p. 178 Google Scholar.

60 Ladd and Lipset, ‘Us’, p. 70.

61 Ibid., p. 81; Ladd and Lipset, ‘Us Revisited’, p. 37. The percentages for all disciplines were 25 and 16, respectively.

62 Lasswell, , The Future of Political Science, New York, Atherton Press, 1963, p. 170 Google Scholar.

63 Ladd and Lipset, ‘Us’, p. 64.

64 Key, op. cit., p. 971.

65 See, for example, Miller, Warren E., ‘The Role of Research in the Unification of a Discipline’, American Political Science Review, Vol. 75, No. 1, 03 1981, p. 12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

66 Somit and Tanenhaus, American Political Science, pp. 14–15.

67 Roettger, Op. cit., p. 8.

68 Somit and Tanenhaus, American Political Science, p. 126.

69 Surkin, Marvin and Wolfe, Alan, ‘Introduction: An End to Political Science’, in Surkin, and Wolfe, (eds), An End to Political Science: The Caucus Papers, New York, Basic Books, 1970, p. 3 Google Scholar.

70 For the emergence of the CNPS, see Lowi, Theodore J., ‘The Politicization of Political Science’, American Politics Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 1, 01 1973, pp. 43–71 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

71 Surkin and Wolfe, Op. cit., pp. 4–5.

72 Wolfe, , ‘Unthinking About the Thinkable: Reflections on the Failure of the Caucus for a New Political Science’, Politics and Society, Vol. 1, No. 3, 05 1971, p. 406 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

73 Surkin and Wolfe, Op. cit., p. 7.

74 Surkin, ‘Sense and Non‐Sense in Politics’, in Surkin and Wolfe (eds), An End to Political Science, pp. 29–30.

75 Surkin and Wolfe, Op. cit., p. 7.

76 Wolfe, Op. cit., p. 401.

77 Easton, The Political System, p. 377.

78 Kuhn, Thomas S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., Chicago and London, University of Chicago Press, 1970, p. 6 Google Scholar.

79 Roettger, Op. cit., p. 39.

80 Ibid., p. 37. In a perceptive analysis of the post‐behaviouralist critique, Franz Lehner concluded that the post‐behaviour revolution has not yet begun. See his ‘Nostalgic einer Disziplin oder die Revolution, die nie stattgefunden hat’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Vol. 15, No. 2 June 1974, especially pp. 250–4.

81 Ihara, Randal H., ‘The Coming Crisis of American Political Science: An Overview’, Review of Social Theory, Vol. 1, No. 1, 09 1972, p. 56 Google Scholar.

82 Almond, and Genco, Stephen J., ‘Clouds, Clocks, and the Study of Politics’, World Politics, Vol. XXIX, No. 4, 07 1977, pp. 494–5Google Scholar.

83 Ibid., p. 522. For an excellent discussion of political science’s reception of Kuhn’s philosophy of science, see Ball, Terence, ‘From Paradigms to Research Programs: Toward a Post‐Kuhnian Political Science’, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. XX, No. 1, 02 1976, pp. 151–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

84 Wahlke, , ‘Pre‐Behavioralism in Political Science’, American Political Science Review, Vol. 73, No. 1, 03 1979, p. 19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

85 Ibid., p. 20.

86 Ibid., p. 10.

87 Somit and Tanenhaus, The Development of American Political Science, p. 237.

88 Roettger, op. cit., p. 10.

89 Ibid., p. 12.

90 Ibid., p. 14.

91 Ibid., p. 15.

92 Ladd and Lipset, ‘Us Revisited’, p. 39.

93 Roettger, op. cit., p. 10.

94 Easton, ‘The International Character of National Political Science’, p. 5.

95 See O’Brien, Donal C., ‘Modernization, Order, and the Erosion of a Democratic Ideal: American Political Science, 1960–1970’, Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 8, No. 4, 07 1972, pp. 351–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

96 The literature on the academic labour market problems is vast. Among the best works are Cartter, Allan M., PhD.’s and the Academic Labor Market, New York, McGraw‐Hill Book Co., 1976 Google Scholar, and Freeman, Richard B., The Overeducated American, New York and London, Academic Press, 1976 Google Scholar.

97 For an explanation of this, see Dreijmanis, , ‘Political Science in the United States: An Uncertain Vocation’, Il Politico, Vol. XLV, No. 4, 12 1980, pp. 656–7Google Scholar.

98 Hirsch, Fred, Social Limits to Growth, Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1978, p. 3 Google Scholar. See also Dore, Ronald, The Diploma Disease: Education, Qualification and Development, London, George Allen & Unwin, 1976, especially pp. 84–97 Google Scholar.

99 Lane, ‘Cognition, Consciousness, and Depression: Effects of the Market and the Democratic State’, Paper presented at the XI World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Moscow, 12–18 August 1979, p. 45.

100 National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Summary Reports 1970 and 1981: Doctorate Recipients from United States Universities, Washington, DC, 1971 and 1981, pp. 11, 31, respectively.

101 Ibid..

102 Mann, Sheilah K., ‘Placement of Political Scientists, 1978–79’, P. S., Vol. XIII, No. 1, Winter 1980, p. 11 Google Scholar; Mann, , ‘Placement of Political Scientists, 1980–1981’, P. S., Vol. XV, No. 1, Winter 1982, p. 86 Google Scholar.

103 National Research Council, op. cit., pp. 7, 33.

104 Calculated by the author from data provided in Hugh G. Thorburn, ‘Graduate Studies in Political Science in Canada: Their Relationship to the Development of the Discipline and the Profession’, paper presented at the 1976 annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Université Laval, 30 May‐2 June 1976, Table 20.

105 For a discussion of this, see Cairns, Alan C., ‘Political Science in Canada and the Americanization Issue’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, Vol. VIII, No. 2, 06 1975, pp. 191–234 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

106 ‘Political Science Faculty and Student Data’, P. S., Vol. XII, No. 3, Summer 1979, p. 334.

107 Mann, Thomas E., ‘Executive Director’s Quarterly Column’, P. S., Vol. XIV, No. 3, Summer 1981, p. 582 Google Scholar.

108 Ibid..

109 Bureau of Labor Statistics, Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, 1982–1983 Edition, Bulletin 2200, Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, 1982, p. 110. The percentage estimate was provided to the author by the International Political Science Association in a letter dated 29 March 1982.

110 Roettger, op. cit., p. 30.

111 Ladd and Lipset, ‘US Revisited’, p. 44.

112 Ibid., p. 56.

113 Ibid., p. 30.

114 Ibid., p. 52.

115 ‘Political Science Faculty and Student Data’, p. 334; ‘Political Science Degrees Awarded and Graduate Students Enrolled: 1982 Update’, P. S., Vol. XV, No. 3, Summer 1982, p. 459.

116 Calculated by the author from data provided in the American Political Science Association’s Guide to Graduate Study in Political Science 1974 and 1982, Washington, DC, 1974 and 1982, pp. 3–16 and 347–50, respectively.

117 Mann, Thomas E., ‘Placement of Political Scientists in 1977’, P. S., Vol. XI, No. 1, Winter 1978, p. 27 Google Scholar.

118 Bureau of Labor Statistics, op. cit., p. 112.

119 Walker, Jack L., ‘Challenges of Professional Development for Political Science in the Next Decade and Beyond’, P. S., Vol. XI, No. 4, Fall 1978, p. 484 Google Scholar.

120 Lane, John C., ‘The Slow Graying of Our Professoriate’, P. S., Vol. XV, No. 1, Winter 1982, p. 52 Google Scholar.

121 Walker, op. cit., p. 488.

122 Lane, ‘To Nurture a Discipline’, pp. 164–65.

123 Walker, op. cit., p. 487.

124 Waldo, ‘Political Science’, p. 58. See also pp. 118–22 for a discussion as to whether or not political science is a profession.

125 Walker, op. cit., p. 489.

126 Ladd and Lipset, ‘Us Revisited’, pp. 44–6.

127 Sheilah K. Mann, ‘Placement of Political Scientists, 1980–1981’, p. 89.

128 Somit and Tanenhaus, The Development of American Political Science, p. 220.