Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T19:27:38.093Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to critics: Contribution to Global Constitutionalism Symposium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2016

ROBERT O. KEOHANE  and
JULIA C. MORSE
ROBERT O. KEOHANE*
Affiliation:
Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public & International Affairs, Robertson Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, United States
JULIA C. MORSE*
Affiliation:
Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public & International Affairs, Robertson Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, United States
*
*Email: [email protected]
†Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Articles
Information
Global Constitutionalism , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , November 2016 , pp. 344 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For a discussion of accountability from a political science perspective, see Grant, R and Keohane, RO, ‘Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics’ (2005) 99(1) American Political Science Review 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 We capitalise Global Constitutionalism when referring it to a doctrine or set of beliefs held by some scholars; we do not capitalise it when we refer to it as a set of institutional arrangements operating at the international level with restraints on the exercise of authority.

3 Harman, S, Global Health Governance (Global Institutions) (Routledge, New York, NY, 2011).Google Scholar

4 Ambrosio, T. ‘Catching the ‘‘Shanghai Spirit’’: How the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Promotes Authoritarian Norms in Central Asia’ (2008) 60(8) Europe Asia Studies 1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar