Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T19:27:57.723Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpretative theories as roadmaps to constitutional identity: The case of the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2015

OR BASSOK
OR BASSOK*
Affiliation:
European University Institute, Via dei Roccettini, 9 1-50014, San Domenico di Fiesole, Italy
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As long as the American Constitution serves as the focal point of American identity, many constitutional interpretative theories also serve as roadmaps to various visions of American constitutional identity. Using the debate over the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, I expose the identity dimension of various interpretative theories and analyse the differences between the roadmaps offered by them. I argue that according to each of these roadmaps, courts’ authority to review legislation is required in order to protect a certain vision of American constitutional identity even at the price of thwarting Americans’ freedom to pursue their current desires. The conventional framing of interpretative theories as merely techniques to decipher the constitutional text or justifications for the Supreme Court’s countermajoritarian authority to review legislation and the disregard of their identity function is perplexing in view of the centrality of the Constitution to American national identity. I argue that this conventional framing is a result of the current understanding of American constitutional identity in terms of neutrality toward the question of the good. This reading of the Constitution as lacking any form of ideology at its core makes majority preferences the best take of current American identity, leaving constitutional theorists with the mission to justify the Court’s authority to diverge from majority preferences.

Keywords

constitutional identityinterpretative theoriesliving constitutionalismoriginalismPatient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Type
Research Article
Information
Global Constitutionalism , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , November 2015 , pp. 289 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce. 1984. ‘‘The Storrs Lectures: Discovering the Constitution.’’ Yale Law Journal 93:1013–72.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. 1989. ‘‘Constitutional Politics/Constitutional Law.’’ Yale Law Journal 99:453–547.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. 1991. 1 We the People: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. 1995. ‘‘Higher Lawmaking.’’ In Responding to Imperfection, edited by Levinson, Sanford, 63–88. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. 1997. ‘‘A Generation of Betrayal?’’ Fordham Law Review 65:1519–36.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. 1998. 2 We the People: Transformations. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. 1999. ‘‘Revolution on a Human Scale.’’ Yale Law Journal 108:2279–2349.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. 2010. The Decline and Fall of the American Republic. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. 2014. 3 We the People: The Civil Rights Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar
Althaus, Scott L. 2003. Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Amar, Akhil Reed. 2012. America’s Unwritten Constitution. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M. 2001. “Brown as Icon.” In What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said, edited by Balkin, Jack M., 3–28. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M. 2004. “What Brown Teaches Us about Constitutional Theory.” Virginia Law Review 90:1537–77.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M. 2011a. Living Originalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M. 2011b. Constitutional Redemption. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M. 2013a. “The New Originalism and the Uses of History.” Fordham Law Review 82:641–719.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack M. 2013b. ‘‘The American Constitution as ‘Our Law.” Yale Journal Law & Humanities 25:113–48.Google Scholar
Balogh, Brian. 2007. A Government Out of Sight: the Mystery of National Authority in Nineteenth-century America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barkow, Rachel E. ‘‘More Supreme Than Court? The Fall of the Political Question Doctrine and the Rise of Judicial Supremacy.” Columbia Law Review 102:237–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassok, Or. 2011. ‘‘The Sociological-Legitimacy Difficulty.’’ Journal of Law & Politics 26:239–72.Google Scholar
Bassok, Or. 2012. ‘‘The Two Countermajoritarian Difficulties.’’ Saint Louis University Public Law Review 32:333–82.Google Scholar
Bassok, Or. 2013. ‘‘The Supreme Court’s New Source of Legitimacy.’’ University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 16:153–98.Google Scholar
Bassok, Or. 2014. ‘‘The Court Cannot Hold.’’ Journal of Law & Politics 30:1–52.Google Scholar
Bassok, Or. 2015. ‘‘Constitutional Law: A Language of Expertise?’’ Georgetown Law Journal Online 103:66–76.Google Scholar
Bassok, Or and Dotan, Yoav. 2013. ‘‘Solving the Countermajoritarian Difficulty?’’ International Journal of Constitutional Law 11:13–33.Google Scholar
Bennett, Robert W. and Solum, Lawrence B.. 2011. Constitutional Originalism: A Debate. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bickel Alexander, M. 1962. The Least Dangerous Branch. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Black, Charles L Jr.. 1997. A New Birth of Freedom: Human Rights, Named and Unnamed. New York, NY: Grosset/Putnam.Google Scholar
Blackman, Josh. 2013. Unprecedented: The Constitutional Challenge to Obamacare. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
Bobbitt, Philip. 1982. Constitutional Fate: Theory of the Constitution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert H. 1971. ‘‘Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems.’’ Indiana Law Journal 47:1–35.Google Scholar
Boyd, Julian P., ed. 1958. Letter from Thomas Jefferson to James Madison (6 Sept 1789). 15The Papers of Thomas Jefferson. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Rebecca L. 1998. ‘‘Accountability, Liberty, and the Constitution.’’ Columbia Law Review 98:531–79.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Stanley C. 2005. ‘‘The Countermajoritarian Difficulty Tradition versus Original Meaning.’’ In The Judiciary and American Democracy: Alexander Bickel, the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, and Contemporary Constitutional Theory, edited by Ward, Kenneth D. and Castillo, Cecilia R., 105–22. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, Simone. 2004. ‘‘Democracy, Popular Sovereignty and Constitutional Legitimacy.’’ Constellations 11:154–73.Google Scholar
Colby, Thomas B. and Smith, Peter J.. 2009. ‘‘Living Originalism.’’ Duke Law Journal 59:239–307.Google Scholar
Cross, Frank B. 2013. The Failed Promise of Originalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1994. Spectres of Marx. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Tocqueville, Alexis. 1835. Democracy in America. Reprint edn, 1965. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dionne, E. J Jr.. 2012. Our Divided Political Heart. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Dodson, Scott. 2008. ‘‘A Darwinist View of the Living Constitution.’’ Vanderbilt Law Review 61:1319–47.Google Scholar
Dunn, Joshua. 2011. ‘‘The Spirit is Partially Willing: The Legal Realism and Halfhearted Minimalism of President Obama.’’ In The Obama Presidency in the Constitutional Order: A First Look, edited by McNamara, Carol and Marlowe, Melanie M., 91–110. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1996. Freedom’s Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Eisgruber, Christopher L. 1995. ‘‘The Fourteenth Amendment’s Constitution.’’ Southern California Law Review 69:47–102.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 2000. Ulysses Unbound. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Engel, Stephen M. 2011. American Politicians Confront the Court. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. and Ferejohn, John. 2010. A Republic of Statutes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fallon, Richard H Jr.. 2001. Implementing the Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen M. 1979. “Foreword: The Forms of Justice.” Harvard Law Review 93:1–58.Google Scholar
Forbath, Willliam E. 2011. ‘‘The Distributive Constitution and Workers’ Rights.’’ Ohio State Law Journal 72:1115–57.Google Scholar
Ford, Paul Leicester, ed. 1894. 5 The Writings of Thomas Jefferson. New York, NY: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry. 2002. ‘‘The Birth of an Academic Obsession: The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Five.’’ Yale Law Journal 112:153–259.Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry. 2009. The Will of the People. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry and Solow, Sara. 2013. ‘‘The Federal Right to an Adequate Education.’’ George Washington Law Review 81:92–156.Google Scholar
Gardner, James A. 1998. ‘‘Southern Character, Confederate Nationalism, and the Interpretation of State Constitutions: A Case Study in Constitutional Argument.’’ Texas Law Review 76:1219–92.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 1997. ‘‘The Collapse of Constitutional Originalism and the Rise of the Notion of the ‘Living Constitution’ in the Course of American State-Building.’’Studies in American Political Development 11:191–247.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann. 1991. Rights Talk. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Goldford, Dennis J. 2005. The American Constitution and the Debate over Originalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Maxine D. 2006. ‘‘Human Dignity in Supreme Court Constitutional Jurisprudence.’’ Nebraska Law Review 84:740–94.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark A. 2013. ‘‘The Coming Constitutional Yo-Yo? Elite Opinion, Polarization, and the Direction of Judicial Decision Making.’’ Howard Law Journal 56:661–719.Google Scholar
Greene, Jamal. 2009a. ‘‘On the Origins of Originalism.’’ Texas Law Review 88:1–90.Google Scholar
Greene, Jamal. 2009b. ‘‘Selling Originalism.’’ Georgetown Law Journal 97:657–721.Google Scholar
Grimm, Dieter. 2005. ‘‘Integration by Constitution.’’ International Journal of Constitutional Law 3:193–208.Google Scholar
Gustafson, Thomas. 1992. Representative Words: Politics, Literature, and the American Language, 1776–1865. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2001. “Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?” Political Theory 29:766–81.Google Scholar
Hand, Learned. 1958. The Bill of Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik. 1987. ‘‘The Constitution of Aspiration and ‘The Rights that Belong to Us All’.’’ The Journal of American History 74:1013–34.Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis. 1990. The Age of Rights. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen. 1988. ‘‘Precommitment and the Paradox of Democracy.’’ In Constitutionalism and Democracy, edited by Elster, Jon and Slagstad, Rune, 195–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. 1992. The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J. 1993. ‘‘The Supreme Court, 1992 Term – Foreword: The Constitution of Change: Legal Fundamentality Without Fundamentalism.’’ Harvard Law Review 107:30–117.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 2004. Who Are We? The Challenges to America’s National Identity. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Jackson, Vicki. 2005. ‘‘Constitutional Comparisons: Convergence, Resistance, Engagement.’’ Harvard Law Review 119:109–28.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. 2006. ‘‘Constitutional Identity.’’ The Review of Politics 68:361.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary Jeffrey. 2010. Constitutional Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Lyndon B. 1965. ‘‘Remarks at the University of Michigan.” (22 May 1964) In 1 Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: Lyndon B. Johnson, 1963–64.Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul W. 1992. Legitimacy and History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul W. 1999. The Cultural Study of Law. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul W. 2003. ‘‘Marbury in the Modern Era: Comparative Constitutionalism in a New Key.’’ Michigan Law Review 101:2677–2705.Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul W. 2004. ‘‘The Question of Sovereignty.’’ Stanford Journal of International Law 40:259–82.Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul W. 2005a. ‘‘American Exceptionalism, Popular Sovereignty, and the Rule of Law.’’ In American Exceptionalism and Human Rights, edited by Ignatieff, Michael. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 198.Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul W. 2005b. Putting Liberalism in its Place. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kammen, Michael. 1988. A Season of Youth. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kammen, Michael. 2006. A Machine That Would Go of Itself. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Karlan, Pamela S. 2009. ‘‘Constitutional Law as Trademark.’’ UC Davis Law Review 43:385–410.Google Scholar
Kommers, Donald P. 2000. ‘‘The Basic Law: A Fifty Year Assessment.’’ SMU Law Review 53:477–92.Google Scholar
Koppelman, Andrew. 2013. Defending American Religious Neutrality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, Larry D. 2004. The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. 1988. Constitutional Faith. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. 2014. ‘‘Popular Sovereignty and the United States Constitution: Tensions in the Ackermanian Program.’’ Yale Law Journal 123:2644–67.Google Scholar
Liu, Goodwin, Karlan, Pamela S. and Schroeder, Christopher H.. 2009. Keeping Faith with the Constitution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macey, Jonathan R. 1995. ‘‘Originalism as an ‘ism’.’’ Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 19:301–09.Google Scholar
Marshall, William P. 2012. ‘‘National Healthcare and the American Constitutional Culture.’’ Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 35:131–52.Google Scholar
McConnell, Michael. 1998. ‘‘Textualism and the Dead Hand of the Past.’’ George Washington Law Review 66:1127–42.Google Scholar
McGinnis, John O. and Rappaport, Michael. 2002. ‘‘Our Supermajoritarian Constitution.’’ Texas Law Review 80:703–806.Google Scholar
McGinnis, John O and Rappaport, Michael. 2007. ‘‘Original Interpretive Principles as the Core of Originalism.’’ Constitutional Commentary 24:371.Google Scholar
McGinnis, John O and Rappaport, Michael. 2012. ‘‘The Abstract Meaning Fallacy.’’ University of Illinois Law Review 2012:737–82.Google Scholar
McGinnis, John O and Rappaport, Michael. 2013. Originalism and the Good Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Merkl, Peter H. 1963. The Origin of the West German Republic. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank I. 1998. ‘‘Constitutional Authorship.’’ In Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations, edited by Alexander, Larry, 64–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 64.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank I. 2005. ‘‘Integrity-Anxiety?’’ In American Exceptionalism and Human Rights, edited by Ignatieff, Michael, 241–76. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. 2006. ‘‘The End of Denial.’’ Dissent 21–23.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. 2007. Constitutional Patriotism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter. 1980. ‘‘An Ordering of Constitutional Values.’’ Southern California Law Review 53:703–60.Google Scholar
Myrdal, Gunner. 1944 (1996). An American Dilemma. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Parent, William A. 1992. ‘‘Constitutional Values and Human Dignity.’’ In The Constitution of Rights: Human Dignity and American Values, edited by Meyer, Michael J. and Parent, W. A., 47–72. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Parrish, Austen L. 2007. ‘‘A Storm in a Teacup: The U.S. Supreme Court’s Use of Foreign Law.’’ University of Illinois Law Review 2007:637–80.Google Scholar
Perry, Michael J. 1982. The Constitution, the Courts, and Human Rights. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Perry, Michael J. 2003. ‘‘Protecting Human Rights in a Democracy: What Role for Courts?’’ Wake Forest Law Review 38:635.Google Scholar
Post, Robert C. 2000. ‘‘Democratic Constitutionalism and Cultural Heterogeneity.’’ Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 25:185–204.Google Scholar
Post, Robert C. and Siegel, Reva. 2009. “Democratic Constitutionalism.” In The Constitution in 2020, edited by Balkin, Jack M. and Siegel, Reva B., 25. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Powe, Lucas A. 2000. The Warren Court in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, H. Jefferson. 2002. A Community Built on Words. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Primus, Richard. 2010. ‘‘The Function of Ethical Originalism.’’ Texas Law Review See Also 88:79–89.Google Scholar
Rakove, Jack N. 1996. Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution. New York, NY: A. A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Rao, Neomi. 2012. ‘‘American Dignity and Healthcare Reform.’’ Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 35:171–84.Google Scholar
Rehnquist, William H. 1976. ‘‘The Notion of a Living Constitution.’’ Texas Law Review 54:693, reprinted in 2006. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 29:401–15.Google Scholar
Richards, David A. J. 1992. ‘‘Constitutional Liberty, Dignity, and Reasonable Justification.’’ In The Constitution of Rights, edited by Meyer, Michael J. and Parent, William A.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Daniel T. 2011. Age of Fracture. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, Jeffrey. 2006. The Most Democratic Branch: How the Courts Serve America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, Mark D. and Schmidt, Christopher W.. 2013. ‘‘Why Broccoli? Limiting Principles and Popular Constitutionalism in the Health Care Case.’’ UCLA Law Review 61:66–145.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Michel. 2005. ‘The European Treaty – Constitution and Constitutional Identity: A View from America.’’ International Journal of Constitutional Law 3:316–31.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, Michel. 2010. The Identity of the Constitutional Subject. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rubenfeld, Jed. 1998. ‘‘The Moment and the Millennium.’’ George Washington Law Review 66:1085–1111.Google Scholar
Rubenfeld, Jed. 2001. Freedom and Time: A Theory of Constitutional Self-Government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rubenfeld, Jed. 2005. Revolution by Judiciary. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. 1996. Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. 2000. ‘‘The Politics of Public Identity.’’ The Hedgehog Review 2:73–88.Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin. 1989a. ‘‘Originalism the Lesser Evil.’’ University of Cincinnati Law Review 57:849–66.Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin. 1989b. ‘‘The Rule of Law as Law of Rules.’’ University of Chicago Law Review 56:1175–1188.Google Scholar
Seidman, Louis Michael. 2001. Our Unsettled Constitution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Seidman, Louis Michael. 2011. ‘‘Should We Have a Liberal Constitution?” Constitutional Commentary 27:541–56.Google Scholar
Seidman, Louis Michael. 2012. On Constitutional Disobedience. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Ann-Marie. ‘‘A Brave New Judicial World.’’ In American Exceptionalism and Human Rights, edited by Ignatieff, Michael, 277–303. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. 1997. Civic Ideals. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Solum, Lawrence B. 2011. “What Is Originalism? The Evolution of Contemporary Originalist Theory.” In The Challenge of Originalism, edited by Huscroft, Grant and Miller, Bradley W.. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, David. 2008. ‘‘Why Conservatives Shouldn’t Be Originalists.’’ Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 31:969–76.Google Scholar
Strauss, David. 2010. The Living Constitution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strong, Tracy B. 2008. ‘‘Is the Political Realm More Encompassing than the Economic Realm?” Public Choice 137:439–50.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Kathleen M. 1992. ‘‘Foreword: The Justices of Rules and Standards.’’ Harvard Law Review 106:22–123.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 2004. The Second Bill of Rights. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 2009. A Constitution of Many Minds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Super, David A. 2014. ‘‘The Modernization of American Public Law: Health Care Reform and Popular Constitutionalism.’’ Stanford Law Review 66:873–951.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1999a. Taking the Constitution away from the Courts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1999b. ‘‘Foreword: The New Constitutional Order and the Chastening of Constitutional Aspiration.’’ Harvard Law Review 113:29–109.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 2006. ‘‘When Is Knowing Less Better Than Knowing More? Unpacking the Controversy over Supreme Court Reference to Non-U.S. Law.’’ Minnesota Law Review 90:1275.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2005. ‘‘Foreign Law and the Modern Ius Gentium.’’ Harvard Law Review 119:129–47.Google Scholar
Webber, Grégoire C. N. 2011. ‘‘Originalism’s Constitution.’’ In The Challenge of Originalism, edited by Huscroft, Grant and Miller, Bradley W.. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. 2012. ‘‘In the Face of Crisis: Input Legitimacy, Output Legitimacy and the Political Messianism of European Integration.’’ European Integration 34:825–41.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 1999. Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 2007. Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 2013. ‘‘Originalism: A Critical Introduction.’’ Fordham Law Review 82:375–409.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, J. Harvie III. 2012. Cosmic Constitutional Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar