Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T19:56:49.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Riemann surfaces with maximal automorphism groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2009

Joseph Lehner  and
Morris Newman
Joseph Lehner
Affiliation:
University of MarylandCollege ParkandNational Bureau of StandardsWashington, D.C.
Morris Newman
Affiliation:
National Bureau of StandardsWashington, D.C.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let S be a closed Riemann surface of genus

g > 1,

so that Ŝ, the universal covering surface of S, is hyperbolic. We can then uniformize S by a discrete, nonabelian group Γ1 of Möbius transformations of the upper half-plane ℋ. It follows that N1 = NΩ(Γ1) is discrete; here N1is the normalizer of Γ in Ω, the group of (conformal) automorphisms of ℋ. An automorphism of S can be lifted to a coset of Nl/Γl. Hence C(S), the group of automorphisms of S, is isomorphic to Nl/Γ1. The order of C = C(S) equals the index of Γ1 in N1, which in turn equals ⃒Γ1⃒ / ⃒Nl⃒, where ⃒Nl⃒ is the hyperbolic area of a fundamental region of Nl. Since Γ1 uniformizes a surface, we have ⃒Γ1⃒ = 4π(g – 1), while, by Siegel's results [7], ⃒N1 ⃒ ≧ π/21 and N1 can only be the triangle group (2, 3, 7). Hence in all cases the order of C(S) is at most 84(g–1), an old result of Hurwitz [1]. The surfaces that permit a maximal automorphism group (= automorphism group of maximum order) can therefore be obtained by studying the finite factor groups of (2, 3, 7). Such a treatment, purely algebraic in nature, has been promised by Macbeath [5].

Type
Research Article
Information
Glasgow Mathematical Journal , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , July 1967 , pp. 102 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Glasgow Mathematical Journal Trust 1967

References

1.Hurwitz, A., Über algebraische Gebilde mit eindeutigen Transformationen in sich, Math. Ann. 41 (1893), 403–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Knopp, M. I. and Newman, M., Congruence subgroups of positive genus of the modular group, Illinois J. Math. 9 (1965), 577–583.Google Scholar
3.Lehner, J., Discontinuous groups and automorphic functions, American Math. Soc. (Providence, 1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Lehner, J. and Newman, M., Real two-dimensional representations of the free product of two finite cyclic groups, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 62 (1966), 135–141.Google Scholar
5.Macbeath, A. M., On a theorem of Hurwitz, Proc. Glasgow Math. Assoc. 5 (1961), 90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Macbeath, A. M., On a curve of genus 7, Proc. London Math. Soc. 15 (1965), 527–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Siegel, C. L., Some remarks on discontinuous groups, Ann. of Math. 46 (1945), 708–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar