Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
In the little note on “Fossil Representatives of the Lithodomous Worm Polydora” which appeared in the Geological Magazine for March, 1909 (pp. 108–10), it is said that, “so far as I can ascertain, this genus has not hitherto been recorded in a fossil state.” It has since come to my knowledge that I was not the first so to record it, and I therefore ask permission to make the necessary emendation.
Published by permission of the Trustees of the British Museum.
page 115 note 1 “Los Tigillites del Salto del Fraile y algunas Sonneratia del Morro Solar: contribución á la geología de los alrededores de Lima,” Bol. Cuerpo Ingen. de Minas Perú, No. 17, 64 pp. Lima, 1904.Google Scholar
page 115 note 2 “Arthrophycus and Dædalus of Burrow Origin,” pp. 203–10; and “Prel. Note on the Nature of Taonurus”, pp. 211–4: Proc. Rochester Acad. Sci. iv.