Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:47:08.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The origin of Variscan kink bands: a study from the Dungarvan Syncline, southern Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

F. X. Murphy
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University College, Cork, Ireland

Abstract

Kink bands formed due to the rotation of cleavage are very common within the Irish Variscides. A detailed examination of those within the Dungarvan Syncline has enabled the recognition of three categories based on kink fold axis orientation; the subvertical, those parallel to first or second order fold axes and those with subhorizontal randomly trending axes. The subvertical variety were formed by strike-parallel compression within a hinge depression in the Dungarvan Syncline and modified by later north–south dextral shear stresses to produce cataclasis of the kink-band boundaries, tension-gashes within the kinked segment and over-rotation. Those, whose axes are parallel to major or minor fold axes, formed as accommodation structures during folding due to extension in the be plane. Those, with subhorizontal randomly trending axes formed due to a relaxation in the northward compression which allowed a reorientation of the principal stress directions, σ1 became vertical and kink bands were generated as a consequence of the increased overburden due to fold tightening and thrusting. It is considered that kink bands throughout the Irish Variscides may be divisible into similar categories.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, T. B. 1964. Kink bands and related geological structures. Nature 202, 272–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, T. B. 1968. The geometry of a natural orthorhombic system of kink bands. In Kink-bands and brittle deformation (eds Baer, A. J. and Norris, D. K.). Canadian Geological Survey Paper 68–52, 200–20.Google Scholar
Anderson, T. B. 1974. The relationship between kink-bands and shear fractures in the experimental deformation of slate. Journal of The Geological Society of London 130, 367–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, I. & Handin, J. 1966. Experimental deformation of crystalline rocks. Tectonophysics 3, 249368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, P. M. 1968. Kink-band development in the Lake St. Joseph area, Northwestern Ontario. In Kink-bands and brittle deformation (eds Baer, A. J. and Norris, D. K.). Canadian Geological Survey Paper 68–52, 229–41.Google Scholar
Coe, K. 1959. Boudinage structure in West Cork. Geological Magazine 96, 191200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coe, K. & Selwood, E. B. 1964. Some features of folding and faulting in the Sheeps Head Peninsula, Co. Cork. Scientific Proceedings of the Royal Dublin Society 2A, 2941.Google Scholar
Cooper, M. A., Collins, D., Ford, M., Murphy, F. X. & Trayner, P. M. 1984. Structural style, shortening estimates and the thrust front of the Irish Variscides. In Variscan Tectonics of the North Atlantic Region (eds Hutton, D. H. W. and Sanderson, D. J.). Special Publication of the Geological Society of London 14, 167–75.Google Scholar
Cooper, M. A., Collins, D. A., Ford, M., Murphy, F. X., Trayner, P. M. & O'Sullivan, M. 1986. Structural evolution of the Irish Variscides. Journal of the Geological Society of London 143, 5361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson-Grove, G. E. 1955. Analysis of minor structures near Ardmore, County Waterford. Quarterly Journal of The Geological Society of London 111, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. F. 1965. On the nature and origin of kink-bands. Tectonophysics 1, 459–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donath, F. A. 1961. Experimental study of shear failure in anisotropic rocks. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 72, 984–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donath, F. A. 1964. Kink-banding as a mechanism of faulting in anisotropic rocks. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 45, 103.Google Scholar
Donath, F. A. 1968 a. Experimental study of kink-band development in the Martinsburg Slate. In Kink-bands and brittle deformation (eds Baer, A. J. and Norris, D. K.). Canadian Geological Survey Paper 68–52, 255–87.Google Scholar
Donath, F. A. 1968 b. Strength variation and deformational behaviour in anisotropic rocks. In State of stress in the Earth's crust (ed. Judd, W. R.). 281–98. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Engelder, J. T. 1974. Cataclasis and the generation of fault gouge. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 85, 1515–22.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flinn, D. 1952. A tectonic analysis of the Muness Phyllite Block of Unst and Uyea, Shetland. Geological Magazine 89, 263–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, M. & Ferguson, C. C. 1985. Cleavage strain in the Variscan Fold Belt, County Cork, Ireland, estimated from stretched arsenopyrite rosettes. Journal of Structural Geology 7, 217–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fyson, W. H. 1968. Profile variation in a kink-set. In Kink-bands and brittle deformation (eds Baer, A. J. and Norris, D. K.). Canadian Geological Survey Paper 68–52, 243–54.Google Scholar
Garnett, J. A. 1974. A mechanism for the development of en-echelon gashes in kink zones. Tectonophysics 23, 129–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gay, N. C. & Weiss, L. E. 1974. The relationship between principal stress directions and the geometry of kinks in foliated rocks. Tectonophysics 21, 287300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, W. D. 1962. The Variscan Fold Belt in Ireland. In Some aspects of the Variscan Fold Belt (ed Coe, K.). 4964, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Hanmer, S. K. 1982. Vein arrays as kinematic indicators in kinked anisotropic materials. Journal of Structural Geology 4, 151–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, D. M. 1973. The origin of kink-bands near Tintagel, North Cornwall. Geological Magazine 110, 133–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleist, J. R. 1972. Kink bands along the Denali Fault, Alaska. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 83, 3487–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knill, J. L. 1961. Joint-drags in Mid-Argyllshire. Proceedings of the Geologists Association 72, 1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naylor, D. & Higgs, K. 1980. The geology of the coastline east of Kinsale Harbour, Co. Cork. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Ireland 2, 371–88.Google Scholar
Naylor, D., Reilly, T. A., Sevastopulo, G. D. & Sleeman, A. G. 1983. Stratigraphy and structure in the Irish Variscides. In The Variscan Fold Belt in the British Isles (ed Hancock, P. L.). 2046. Bristol: Hilger.Google Scholar
Naylor, D., Sevastopulo, G. D., Sleeman, A. G. & Reilly, T. A. 1981. The Variscan Fold Belt in Ireland. In The Variscan Orogen in Europe (eds Zwart, J. J. and Dornsiepen, U. F.). Geologie en Mijnbouw 60, 4966.Google Scholar
Paterson, M. S. & Weiss, L. E. 1966. Experimental deformation and folding in phyllite. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 77, 343374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, J. G. 1962. Geometry of conjugate fold systems. Geological Magazine 99, 516–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsay, J. G. 1967. Folding and Fracturing of Rocks. New York: McGraw-Hill. 568 pp.Google Scholar
Sanderson, D. J. 1984. Structural variation across the northern margin of the Variscides in NW Europe. In Variscan Tectonics of the North Atlantic Region (eds Hutton, D. H. W. and Sanderson, J. D.). Special Publication of the Geological Society of London 14, 149–65.Google Scholar
Sevastopulo, G. D. 1981. Hercynian Structures. In A Geology of Ireland (ed Holland, C. H.). 189–99. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Traynor, P. M. & Cooper, M. A. 1984. Cleavage geometry and the development of the Church Bay Anticline, Co. Cork, Ireland. Journal of Structural Geology 6, 83–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeek, E. R. 1978. Kink bands in the Somport Slate, West-Central Pyrenees, France and Spain. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 89, 814–24.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, L. E. 1968. Flexural slip folding of foliated materials. In Kink bands and brittle deformation (ed Baer, A. J. and Norris, D. K.). Canadian Geological Survey Paper 68–52, 294357.Google Scholar
Williams, E. 1970. Kink-bands developed during the folding of sandstone layers at Stony Head, North Tasmania. Tectonophysics 10, 437–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar