Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:20:43.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Occurrence of the Marine Oligocene in Palestine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

L. R. Cox
L. R. Cox
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, British Museum (Natural History).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper deals with a series of fossils from two localities in the coastal plain of Palestine sent to me by Mr. G. S. Blake, Geological Adviser to the Palestine Government. It is possible from their study to establish for the first time the presence of Oligocene beds in that country.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 71 , Issue 8 , August 1934 , pp. 337 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Archiac, A. D ’, 1850. “Description des fossiles du groupe nummulitique…de Bayonne et de Dax,” Mém. Soc. géol. France, [2], iii, 397.Google Scholar
Bellardi, L., 1872–1888. I molluschi del terreni terziarii del Piemonte e della Liguria, Parts 1–5. See also F. Saeco.Google Scholar
Blake, G. S., 1928. Geology and Water Resources of Palestine, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Blake, G. S., 1930. Mineral Resources of Palestine and Transjordan, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Blanckenhorn, M., 1890. “Das Eocän in Syrien, mit besonderer Berüek-sichtigung Nord-Syriens,” Zeitschr. deutsch. geol. Ges., xlii, 318.Google Scholar
Blanckenhorn, M., 1931. “Geologie Palästinas nach heutiger Auffassung,” Zeitschr. deutsch. Palästina-Vereins, liv, 3.Google Scholar
BÖCkh, H. de, Lees, G. M., and Richardson, F. D. S., 1929. “Contribution to the Stratigraphy and Tectonics of the Iranian Ranges,” The Structure of Asia, London (Methuen), 58.Google Scholar
Boussac, J., 1911. “Études paléontologiques sur le Nummulitique alpin,” Mém. explic. Carte géol. France.Google Scholar
Brander, G., 1766. Fossilia Hantoniensia, London.Google Scholar
Brocchi, G., 1814. Conchiologia fossile subapennina, Milan.Google Scholar
Brongniart, A., 1823. Mémoire sur les terrains de sédiment supérieurs calcaréo-trappéens du Vicentin, Paris.Google Scholar
Bukowski, G. von, 1898. “Geologische Uebersichtskarte der Insel Rhodus,” Jahrb. geol. Reichsanst., xlviii, 517.Google Scholar
Canestrelli, G., 1908. “Revisione della fauna oligocenica di Laverda nel Vicentino,” Atti Soc. ligust. Sci. nat., xix, 27, 97.Google Scholar
Checchia-Rispoli, G., 1916. “Sui terreni terziari inferiori del versante settentrionale delle Madonie,” Mem. Carta geol. Ital., vi (2).Google Scholar
Cossmann, M., 1901. Essais de Paléoconchologie comparée, iv.Google Scholar
Cossmann, M., 1921–1922. “Synopsis illustré des mollusques de l’ Éocène et de l’ Oligocène en Aquitaine,” Mém. Soc. géol. France (Pal.), no. 55.Google Scholar
David, E., 1933. “Note sur l’ Oligocène et le Burdigalien de la Syrie septentrionale,” C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, cxcvi, 1134.Google Scholar
Diener, C., 1886. Libanon. Grundlinien der physischen Geographic und Geologie ron Mittel-Syrien. Vienna.Google Scholar
Dollfus, G. F., 1918. “L’Oligocène supérieur marin dans le bassin de l’Adour,” Bull. Soc. géol. France, [4], xvii, 89.Google Scholar
DouvillÉ, H., 1924–1925. “Revision des Lépidocyclines,” Mém. Soc. géol. France, [n.s.], no. 2.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T., 1870. “Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Conehylienfauna des vicentinischen Tertiärgebirges,” Denkschr. Akad. Wiss. Wien, xxx, 137.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T., 1875. “Das Alter der Tertiärsehichten von Malta,” Sitzber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, lxx, (1), 92.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T., 1879. “Über die von Dr. E. Tietze aus Persien mitgebrachten Tertiärver-steinerungen,” Denkschr. Akad. Wiss. Wien, xli, (2), 99.Google Scholar
Grateloup, J. P. S. de, 1847. Conchyliologie fossile des terrains tertiaries du bassin de l’ Adour, Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Gregorio, A. de, 1881. Sulla fauna delle argille scagliose di Sicilia (Oligocene-Eocene) e sul Miocene di Nicosia, Palermo.Google Scholar
Gregorio, A. de, 1894. “Fossiles des environs de Bassano…,” Ann. Géol. et Pal., livr. 13.Google Scholar
Harpe, P. de La, 1879. “Description des Nummulites appartenant à la zone supérieure des falaises de Biarritz,” Bull. Soc. Borda, iv, 137.Google Scholar
Haug, E., 1908–1911. Traité de Géologie, Paris.Google Scholar
Helm, A., 1908. “Die Nummuliten- und Flyschbildungen der Schweizeralpen,” Abh. schweiz. pal. Ges., xxxv.Google Scholar
Kranz, W., 1910. “Das Tertiär zwischen Castelgomberto, Montecchio Maggiore, Creazzo und Monteviale im Vicentin,” Neues Jahrb. Min., Beil.-Bd. xxix, 180.Google Scholar
Locard, A., 1889. “Description des mollusques fossiles des terrains tertiaires inférieurs de la Tunisie,” Explor. scient. Tunisie, Paris, Pal. fasc. 1.Google Scholar
Manzoni, A., 1873. “I Monte Titano i suoi fossili,” Boll. Com. geol. Ital., iv, 3, 67.Google Scholar
Michelotti, G., 1861. Études sur le Miocène inférieur de l’ Italie septentrionale, Harlem.Google Scholar
Newton, R. B., 1911. “Kainozoic Mollusca from Cyrenaica,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxvii, 616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, P., 1900–1901. “Die Priabonaschichten und ihre Fauna,” Palaeontographica, xlvii.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, P., 1900 a. “Beiträge zur Kenntniss des Oligocän und seiner Fauna in den venetianischen Voralpen,” Zeitschr. deutsch. geol. Ges., lii, 243.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, P., 1903. “Ueber die Ueberkippung von S. Orso, des Tertiär des Tretto, und Fauna wie Stellung der Schioschichten,” Zeitschr. deutsch. geol. Ges., lv, 98.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, P., 1917. “Über Fossilien aus dem öbstlichen Kleinasien,” Zeitschr. deutsch. geol. Ges., lxix, Monatsber., 72.Google Scholar
Parona, C. F., 1887. “Appunti per la paleontologia miocenica della Sardegna,” Boll. Soc. geol. ital., vi, 289.Google Scholar
Ravagli, M., 1908. “Nummuliti oligoceniche di Laverda nel Vicentino,” Atti r. Accad. Lincei, [5, Rendic.], xvii, (2), 500.Google Scholar
Reed, F. R. C., 1930. “Contributions to the Geology of Cyprus. Part II: The Tertiary Formations,” Geol. Mag., LXVII, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rovereto, G., 1897–1898. “Note preventive sui pelecipodi del Tongriano ligure,” Atti Soc. ligust. Sci. nat., viii, 309; ix, 153, 312.Google Scholar
Rovereto, G., 1900. “Illustrazione dei molluschi fossili tongriani,” Atti r. Univ. Genova, xv, 31.Google Scholar
Rovereto, G., 1914. Nuovi studi sulla stratigrafia e sulla fauna del’ Oligocene ligure, Genoa.Google Scholar
Sacco, F., 1890–1904. I molluschi dei terreni terziarii del Piemonte e della Liguria, Parts 6–30. See also L. Bellardi.Google Scholar
Schauroth, C. von, 1865. Verzeichniss der Versteinerungen im herzogl. Naturaliencabinet zu Coburg, Coburg.Google Scholar
Silvestri, A., 1909. “nummuliti oligoceniche della Madonna della Catena presso Termini-Imerese (Palermo),” Boll. Soc. geol. ital., xxvii, 593.Google Scholar
Stefanini, G., 1921. “Fossili terziari della Cirenaica,” Pal. Italica, xxvii, 101.Google Scholar
Teppner, W. von, 1922. “Lamellibranchiata tertiaria, Anisomyaria, II,” Fossilium Catalogue, Animalia, pars 15.Google Scholar
Uhlig, V., 1886. “Ueber eine Mikrofauna aus dem Alttertiär der west-galizischen Karpathen,” Jahrb. geol. Reichsanst., xxxvi, 141.Google Scholar
Venzo, S., 1933. “Di alcuni fossili oligocenici del Trentino e del Veronese,” Boll. Soc. geol. ital., lii, 207.Google Scholar
Venzo, S., 1933 a. “II Cattiano di Monte Brione presso Riva del Garda e la sua nuova fauna,” Studi Trentini Sci. nat., xiv, 188.Google Scholar
Vinassa de Regny, P. E., 1896. “I molluschi delle glauconie bellunesi,” Boll. Soc. geol. ital., xv, 192.Google Scholar
Vredenburg, E., 1925, 1928. “Descriptions of Mollusca from the Post-Eocene Tertiary Formation of North-Western India,” Mem. Geol. Sum. Ind., 1.Google Scholar
Wolff, W., 1897. “Die Fauna der südbayerischen Oligocaenmolasse,” Palaeontographica, xliii, 223.Google Scholar