Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:43:55.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

I.—On the value of Mineral Condition in determining the Relative Age of Stone Implements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

S. Hazzledine Warren
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The common English classification of the Palæolithic Period into the epochs of the River-Drift Men and the Cave Men hardly conduces to clearness of thought. The implements of the River-Drift men are often found in the caves, and those of the Cave Men are very common in the river drifts. Although the caves and rock shelters bring us down to a later period than is usually represented in the river drifts (there appear to be exceptions to this), yet the general succession in the two classes of deposits is the same, and they cannot be separated.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , March 1902 , pp. 97 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1902

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 97 note 1 See, for instance, Philippe Salmon, “L'Age de la Pierre à l'Exposition Universelle de 1889,” Paris. Several later Palæolithic implements are figured on p. 29, etc., collected by M. G. d'Ault du Mesnil from the “Quaternaire moyen, assise supérieure” at Abbeville. Note also remarks towards the end of the present paper on Shrub Hill, Feltwell, etc.

page 97 note 2 Some account of these may be found in various papers by Rutot, M. A. in the Bull. Soc. belge Géol. Brux., 1900 and 1901, vols. xiv and xv.Google Scholar

page 97 note 3 Mortillet, G. de, “Classification des Diverses Périodes de l'Age de la Pierre”: Congr. Inter. d'Anthrop. et d'Archéol. Préhist. Bruxelles, 1872, p. 432. “Le Préhistorique Antiquité de l'Homme,” 1883, passim.Google Scholar

page 99 note 1 Journ. Anthrop. Inst., 1899, vol. xxix, pp. 295–301.Google Scholar

page 99 note 2 “Le Préhist. Antiq.,” etc., 1883, p. 133 et seq.

page 99 note 3 Salmon, Philippe: “L'Age de la Pierre,” etc., 1889, p. 17.Google Scholar

page 99 note 4 Bull. Soc. belge Géol. Brux., 1900, vol. xiv, p. 326.Google Scholar

page 100 note 1 Journ. Anthrop. Inst., 1899, vol. xxix, pl. xxxiii.Google Scholar

page 100 note 2 Mortillet, G. de: “Le Préhist. Antiq.,” etc., 1883, pp. 355–367.Google Scholar

page 101 note 1 “Man the Primeval Savage,” 1894, p. 216.Google Scholar

page 102 note 1 Maret, A. de: “Fouilles de la grotte du Placard, près de Rochbertier”; Tours, 1879.Google Scholar Mortillet, G. de: “Musée Préhistorique,” 1881, pl. xxix.Google Scholar

page 102 note 2 Professor Flinders Petrie begins his local scale at 30, in order to allow for future discoveries, and it is as well to carry out that system uniformly, wherever it may be possible to do so.

page 103 note 1 Geol. Mag., 09, 1900, p. 407.Google Scholar

page 104 note 1 Geol. Mag., 08, 1901, pp. 337–344.Google Scholar

page 104 note 2 Bull. Liverpool Museums, 1900, vol. ii, pp. 77–115; 1901, vol. iii, pp. 48–61.Google Scholar

page 104 note 3 Smith, Worthington G.: “Man the Primeval Savage,” 1894, p. 189 et seq.Google Scholar

page 105 note 1 The best general account of this district is to be found in SirEvans, John “Ancient Stone Implements,” 1897, 2nd ed., pp. 543–572.Google Scholar