No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
Through the kindness of the late Rev. W. B. Clarke, of Sydney, I had the opportunity of examining two collections of fossil plants from Australia, which that gentleman had kindly placed at my disposal, together with explanatory notes, which he communicated to me in private letters.
page 486 note 1 This seems to differ from M'Coy's original form from Victoria.
page 486 note 2 These two are new for Australia.
page 486 note 3 Physic. Descr. of N. S. Wales and Van Diemans Land, 1845.
page 486 note 4 Tinned States Exploring Expedition, Geology, 1849.
page 486 note 5 Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. vol. xx. ser. 2, 1847.Google Scholar
page 486 note 6 In Mines and Miner. Statistics of N. S. "Wales, 1875.
page 486 note 7 Palæontographica, 1878–79.
page 486 note 8 On some Ichthyolites from flew Wales, S.Q. J. G. S. vol. xx. 1864, p. 1.Google Scholar
page 486 note 9 I class it with Thinnfeldia.
page 487 note 1 Several species described by myself.
page 487 note 2 This is on the authority of Prof. M'Coy, who quotes from Arowa a Glossopteris linearis, M'Coy, together with an Otopteris ovatu, M'Coy, which, however, is a Rhacopteris, comp. inaquilatera, Göp.
page 488 note 1 In Trans. E. Soc. of Victoria, vol. v. 1860, p. 104.Google Scholar
page 488 note 2 Bull. de l'Acad. Royale de Belgique, 1875, vol. xxxix. pp. 258–263.Google Scholar
page 490 note 1 His specimens differ, however, somewhat from Morris's original type—but later quite similar forms were also found in the Jerusalem's Basin, Tasmania; Morris's specimens were altogether badly preserved.
page 491 note 1 This is probably a misprint for Mendelsohni.—Edit. Geol. Mag.