No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
The detrital matter underlying the Suffolk and N.W. Essex Crags forms an incongruous mass of disrupted local rocks and fossils, supplemented by a few transported boulders of igneous and sedimentary rocks of different ages and mostly small. To these have to be added organic remains of many classes in various conditions of preservation.
page 15 note 1 Geology, vol. ii, p. 382, 1888Google Scholar.
page 16 note 1 Geol. Mag., Dec. VI, Vol. ii, p. 250, 1915Google Scholar.
page 16 note 2 Newton, R. B., F.G.S., “Marine Fossils in Limestone Nodules found on the Mekran (Baluchistan) Beach”: Geol. Mag., Dec. V, Vol. ii, 1905Google Scholar.
page 16 note 3 Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. xvi, p. 369, 1899–1900Google Scholar.
page 17 note 1 “A few remarks upon the Crag of Suffolk”: Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (2), vol. viii, p. 205Google Scholar.
page 17 note 2 Danmarks geologiske Undersøgelse, vol. ii, 1913.
page 17 note 3 Danske, K. Vid. Selsk. Skrift (7), vol. iii, p. 217, 1907Google Scholar.
page 17 note 4 Bull. Soc. Belge de Géologie, vol. vii, p. 78, 1893Google Scholar.
page 17 note 5 Dansk. Geol. Forening., vol. v, No. 1, 1916Google Scholar.
page 17 note 6 Journal of Conchology, vol. xv, 1916–1917Google Scholar.
page 18 note 1 Mem. Acad. Roy. Bruxelles, vol. xi, 1837Google Scholar.
page 18 note 2 Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. xvi, p. 385Google Scholar.
page 18 note 3 Report on Ceylonese Pearl Fisheries, Roy. Soc., 1903, p. 348Google Scholar.
page 18 note 4 “Mellem Miocæne Blookke fra Esbjerg”: Dansk. Geol. Foren., vol. v, No. 1, 1916Google Scholar.
page 18 note 5 Q.J.G.S., vol. lxxii, 1917Google Scholar.
page 19 note 1 See Bell, , “Sub-Crag Detritus”: Proc. Prehistoric Soc. East Anglia, 1915, vol. ii, not vol. xi as on p. 408 (ante)Google Scholar.
page 19 note 1 Q.J.G.S., vol. xxvii, 1870Google Scholar.