Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:30:27.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

V.—A Revision of some Carboniferous Corals1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

R. G. Carruthers
Affiliation:
The Geological Survey.

Extract

More than sixty years have now elapsed since the publication of the classical monograph of MM. Milne-Edwards and Jules Haime, “Les Polypes Fossiles des Terrains Palæozoïques.” It can only be expected that many of the original descriptions of species in that work have for long been in need of amplification and revision. This applies with added force to the corals of the Carboniferous Limestone, in view of the impetus given to the palæontological study of that formation, by the vigorous revival of zonal work witnessed in the last few years. Those species in most urgent need of revision belong to the lower, or Tournaisian division of the Limestone, since their satisfactory determination affords a basis for evolutionary studies on the succeeding faunas, and an attempt is here made to deal with a few of these forms.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1908

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Communicated by permission of the Director of the Geological Survey of Great Britain.

References

page 21 note 1 With the exception of Michelin's Caninia cornucopiœ and Caninia cornu-bovis, which, however, also came from Tournai.

page 22 note 1 Zeit. Deut. Geol. Ges., Vol. xxi (1869).Google Scholar

page 24 note 1 Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. VII, vol. xviii (1906), p. 362.Google Scholar

page 25 note 1 Plates IV and V will appear in February.

page 30 note 1 Thomson, J., “Corals Carb. Syst. Scot.”: Proc. Phil. Soc. Glasgow, p. 152, pl. vi, figs. 21, 22, etc. (1883).Google Scholar

A correction has been issued for this article: