Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T02:18:18.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Problem of the Association of Acid and Basic Rocks in Central Complexes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Arthur Holmes
Arthur Holmes
Affiliation:
Professor of Geology, The University, Durham.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the outstanding problems of petrogenesis at the present time is that offered by the remarkable association of sharply contrasted acid and basic rocks (e.g. granite-gabbro; granophyredolerite; pitchstone-tholeiite; and rhyolite-basalt) in igneous complexes such as those of the British Tertiary Province and those of the great lopoliths of Duluth and Sudbury in North America and the Bushveld in South Africa. The contrast was first recognized in the lavas of Iceland by Bunsen (1) and it led him to the conception that two fundamental magmas, respectively acid and basic, were concerned in the genesis of the igneous rocks of Iceland and similar provinces elsewhere. Bunsen's view, however, has had little influence in the development of petrological philosophy. The petrologists of the Geological Survey in this country, and Bowen and others in North America, have assembled a very weighty and reasonable mass of field and laboratory evidence supporting the hypothesis that the acid rocks are residual products arising from the crystallization-differentiation of basaltic magmas. In the recently published Ardnamurchan Memoir (2), for example, it is claimed that as a result of the early extraction from the Plateau Magma of olivine, pyroxenes, basic plagioclase, and iron ores, the residual magma would reach a composition “which would find expression as quartz-doleritic rocks with an acid mesostasis capable of mechanical separation and a separate existence as acid lavas or intrusions” (p. 95). Bunsen's two magmas are thus regarded as successive products from a single parent stock.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 68 , Issue 6 , June 1931 , pp. 241 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Bunsen, R. W.: Ann. Phys. Chem.(Poggendorff), lxxxiii, 1851, 197–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2) “The Geology of Ardnamurchan, North-West Mull and Coll.,” Mem. Geol. Surv. Scotland, 1930.Google Scholar
(3) Holmes, A.: “The Origin of Igneous Rocks,” Science Progress, 1916, 67–73.Google Scholar
(4) Lacroix, A.: “La Constitution lithologique des Îles volcaniques de la Polynésie Australe,” Mem. Acad. Sci. Paris, lix, 1927, 54.Google Scholar
(5) Guppy, E. M. and Hawkes, L.: “A Composite Dyke from Eastern Iceland,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxxi, 1925, 325–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6) Jeffreys, H.: The Earth, second edition, 1929.Google Scholar
(7) Holmes, A.: “Radioactivity and Earth Movements,” Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasgow, xviii (for 1928–1929), 1931, 567.Google Scholar
(8) Jeffreys, H.: The Earth, second edition, 1929, 139.Google Scholar
(9) Bowen, N. L.: “The Reaction Principle in Petrogenesis,” Journ. Geol., xxx, 1922, 177–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, N. L.: “The Behaviour of Inclusions in Igneous Magmas,” Journ. Geol., xxx, 1922, 513–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, N. L.: The Evolution of Igneous Rocks, Princeton, 1928.Google Scholar
(10) For a discussion of the process of magmatic ascent see Holmes, A., “Contributions to the Theory of Magmatic Cycles,” Geol. Mag., LXIII, 1926, 315.Google Scholar
11 Kaufmann, H.: “Rhythmische Phänomene der Erdoberfläche,” 1929, 140, et seq.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12) Cited by Bowen, N. L. in The Evolution of Igneous Rocks, 1928, 298.Google Scholar
(13) “Tertiary and Post-Tertiary Geology of Mull, Loch Aline, and Oban,” Mem. Geol. Sure. Scotland, 1924, 229.Google Scholar
(14) Hawkes, L.: “On a Partially fused Quartz-felspar Rock and on Glomerogranular Texture,” Min. Mag., xxii, p. 163, 1929. For other examples and references see a review of the subject by E. S. Larsen, “The Temperatures of Magmas,” Amer. Mm., xiv, 1929, 89–92.Google Scholar
(15) Daly, R. A. “The Geology of Ascension Island,” Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts and Sci., lx, 1925, 75.Google Scholar
(16) For data see Grout, F. F.: “Two-phase Convection in Igneous Magmas,” Journ. Geol., xxvi, 1918, 489.Google Scholar
(17) Lacroix, A.: Les Enclaves des Roches Volcaniques, 1893, 600.Google Scholar
(18) Holmes, A.: “The Tertiary Volcanic Rocks of the Dist rict of Mozambique,” Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., lxxxii, 1917, 273.Google Scholar
(19) Harker, A.: “Differentiation in Intercrustal Magma Basins,” Journ. Geol., xxiv, 1916, 555.Google Scholar
(20) Coleman, A. P., Moore, E. S., and Walker, T. L.: “The Sudbury Nickel Intrusive,” Contributions to Canadian Mineralogy, No 28, University of Toronto Studies (Geological Series), 1929.Google Scholar