Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:51:35.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mid-Cretaceous (Albian-Cenomanian) calcareous nannofossils from Pont du Fahs (northern Tunisia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

Minoo Hojjatzadeh
Minoo Hojjatzadeh*
Affiliation:
Oil Service Company of Iran, P.O. Box 1065, Tehran, Iran Now c/o Postgraduate Unit of Micropalaeontology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1 E6BT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Calcareous nannofossils from mid-Cretaceous (Albian-Cenomanian) sections at Pont du Fahs (northern Tunisia) allow the recognition of three nannofossil zones-the Prediscosphaera cretacea Zone, the Hayesites albiensis Zone, and the Eiffellithus turriseffeli Zone. A comparative study has been made of the nannofossil assemblages from Pont du Fahs and 14 other sites in North Africa, Western Europe, the North Atlantic and United States.

Type
Research Article
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 118 , Issue 2 , March 1981 , pp. 161 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aubry, M. P. & Crosaz, R. 1977. Découverte de nannofossiles dans le Cenomanien supérieur du Portugal (région de Villa Nova de Ourem). Revue Micropaléont. 19 193–9.Google Scholar
Black, M. 1973. British Lower Cretaceous Coccoliths. I. Gault Clay. Palaeontogr. Soc. (Monogr.), part 2, 49–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. R. 1963. A preparation technique for calcareous nannoplankton. Micropaleontology 9 103–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grün, W. & Allemann, F. 1975. The Lower Cretaceous of Caravaca (Spain). Berriasian Calcareous Nannoplankton of the Miravetes Section (Subbetic Zone, Prov. of Murcia). Eclog. geol. Helv. 68 147–211.Google Scholar
Hay, W. W. 1965. Calcareous nannofossils. In Handbook of Paleontological Techniques (ed. Kummel, B. and Raup, D.), pp. 3–7. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Hay, W. W. 1970. Calcium carbonate compensation. Initial Reps Deep Sea Drilling Project 4, 672.Google Scholar
Hill, M. E. 1976. Lower Cretaceous calcareous nannofossils from Texas and Oklahoma. Palaeontographica B 156, 1–164.Google Scholar
Hojjatzadeh, M. 1977. Calcareous nannofossils from the Barremian to Coniacian of western Morocco and their zonal use. Newsl. Stratigraphy 6, 171–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manivit, H. 1971. Nannofossiles calcaires du Crétacé Français (Aptien-Maestrichtien). Essai de biozonation appuyée sur les stratotypes, pp. 1–187. Thesis, Université de Paris.Google Scholar
Manivit, H., Perch-Nielsen, K., Prince, B. & Verbeek, J. W. 1977. Mid-Cretaceous calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy. Proce. K. ned. Akad. Wet. B 80 169–81.Google Scholar
Marks, P. 1967. Foraminifera from the Craie de Théligny (Cenomanian, Dept. Sarthe, France). Proc. K. ned. Akad. Wet. B 70 425–42.Google Scholar
Marks, P. 1968. Smaller foraminifera from the ‘Couches à Orbitolina complanata’ (Cenomanian) at Ballon (Sarthe, France). Proc. K. ned. Akad. Wet. B 71 373–86.Google Scholar
Roth, P. H. & Thierstein, H. R. 1972. Calcareous nannoplankton. Initial Reps Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 14, 421–85.Google Scholar
Salaj, J. 1974. Microbiostratigraphie du Crétacé supérieur de la région de Pont du Fahs. In Salaj, J., pp. 41–9. (See below.)Google Scholar
Salaj, J., Bajanik, S., Batik, P., Bismuth, H., Bonnefous, J., Floridia, S., Hooyberghs, H. J. E., Lajmi, T., Maameri, N., Maamouri, A. L., Maamouri, M. & Memmi, L. 1974. Livret-guide des Excursions, VIe Colloque Africain de Micropaléontologie. Tunis: Éditions du Service Géologique de Tunisie, pp. 1–88.Google Scholar
Smith, A. G. & Briden, J. C. 1977. Mesozoic and Cenozoic Paleocontinental Maps. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tappan, H. 1968. Primary production, isotopes, extinctions and the atmosphere. Palaeogr., Palaeoclim., Palaeoecol. 4 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thierstein, H. R. 1971. Tentative Lower Cretaceous calcareous nannoplankton zonation. Eclog. geol. Helv. 64, 459–87.Google Scholar
Thierstein, H. R. 1973. Lower Cretaceous calcareous nannoplankton biostratigraphy. Abh. geol. Bundesanst., Wien 29, 3–52.Google Scholar
Thierstein, H. R. 1976. Mesozoic calcareous nannoplankton biostratigraphy of marine sediments. Marine Micropaleontology 1 325–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeek, J. W. 1976(a). Upper Cretaceous calcareous nannoplankton zonation in a composite section near El Kef, Tunisia. Proc. K. ned. Akad. Wet. B 79 129–48.Google Scholar
Verbeek, J. W. 1976(b). Upper Cretaceous nannoplankton from Ballon and Théligny in the type area of the Cenomanian stage (Sarthe, France). Proc. K. ned. Akad. Wet. B 79 69–82.Google Scholar
Verbeek, J. W. 1977. Late Cenomanian to early Turonian calcareous nannofossils from a section SE of Javernant (Dépt. Aube, France). Proc. K. ned. Akad. Wet. B 80, 20–2.Google Scholar
Verbeek, J. W. & Wonders, A. A. H. 1977. The position of the Cenomanian and Turonian stratotypes in planktonic biostratigraphy. Proc. K. ned. Akad. Wet. B 80, 16–9.Google Scholar
Wonders, A. A. H. & Verbeek, J. W. 1977. Correlation of planktonic foraminiferal and calcareous nannofossil zonations of late Albian, Cenomanian and Turonian. Proc. K. ned. Akad. Wet. B 80, 7–15.Google Scholar