Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:25:01.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3D structural modelling of the southern Zagros fold-and-thrust belt diapiric province

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2011

VINCENT TROCMÉ*
Affiliation:
GDF SUEZ, 92930, Paris La Défense, France
EMILY ALBOUY
Affiliation:
GDF SUEZ, 92930, Paris La Défense, France
JEAN-PAUL CALLOT
Affiliation:
IFP-EN, 9852 Rueil-Malmaison, France
JEAN LETOUZEY
Affiliation:
IFP-EN, 9852 Rueil-Malmaison, France UPMC Université Paris 06, UMR 7193, ISTeP, F-75005, Paris, France
NICOLAS ROLLAND
Affiliation:
GDF SUEZ, 92930, Paris La Défense, France
HASSAN GOODARZI
Affiliation:
NIOC, Exploration Directorate, Tehran, Iran
SALMAN JAHANI
Affiliation:
NIOC, Exploration Directorate, Tehran, Iran
*
Author for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

3D modelling of geological structures is a key method to improve the understanding of the geological history of an area, and to serve as a drive for exploration. Geomodelling has been performed on a large 60000 km2 area of the Zagros fold-and-thrust belt of Iran, to reconcile a vast but heterogeneous dataset. Topography, geological surface data and dips, outcrop surveys, and well and seismic data were integrated into the model. The method was to construct a key surface maximizing the hard data constraints. The Oligo-Miocene Top Asmari layer was chosen, as this formation was regionally deposited before the main Zagros collision phase and because the numerous outcrops allow proper control of the bed geometry in the fold cores. Interpreted seismic data have been integrated to interpolate the surfaces at depth within the synclines. Several conceptual models of fold geometry have been applied to estimate the best way to convert seismic time signal to depth. Several deeper horizons down to Palaeozoic strata were deduced from this key horizon by applying palaeo-thickness maps. During the construction, the 3D interpolated surfaces could be reconverted to time, using a velocity model, and compared with previous seismic interpretations. This exercise obliged us to revise some early interpretations of seismic lines that were badly tied to wells. The 3D modelling therefore clearly improves regional interpretation. In addition, the 3D model is the only tool that allows drawing consistent cross-sections in areas where there are no seismic lines. Emerging Hormuz salt diapirs were added to the model. Dimensions and shapes of the individual diapirs were modelled using a statistical survey on the cropping out Hormuz structures. Modelling reliably demonstrated that the diapirs, when piercing, show a constant mushroom shape whose diameter depends on the stratigraphic depth of observation. This observation allowed us to exemplify relations between the pre-existing diapirs and the anticlines of the area, and to highlight the morphological changes from the inner onshore areas to the coastal and offshore areas. In addition, one of the surprising results of this study was the observation of the increasing diameter of the diapirs at the time of the Zagros collision and folding event, with growth strata and overhangs on the flanks of the diapirs.

Type
THE ZAGROS FOLD-THRUST BELT: FOLDS AND FRACTURES
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agard, P., Omrani, J., Jolivet, L. & Mouthereau, F. 2005. Convergence history across Zagros (Iran): constraints from collisional and earlier deformation. International Journal of Earth Sciences 94, 401–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmadhadi, F., Lacombe, O. & Daniel, J.-M. 2007. Early reactivation of basement faults in Central Zagros (SW Iran): evidence from pre-folding fracture populations in the Asmari Formation and Lower Tertiary paleogeography. In Thrust Belts and Foreland Basins: From fold kinematics to hydrocarbon systems (eds Lacombe, O., Lavé, J., Verges, J. & Roure, F.), pp. 205–28. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Ala, M. A. 1974. Salt diapirism in southern Iran. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 58, 758–70.Google Scholar
Alavi, M. 1994. Tectonics of the Zagros orogenic belt of Iran: New data and interpretation. Tectonophysics 229, 211–38.Google Scholar
Al-Barwani, B. & McKlay, K. 2008. Salt tectonics in the Thumrait area, in the southern part of the South Oman Salt Basin: implications for mini-basin evolution. GeoArabia 13, 77108.Google Scholar
Allen, M. B. & Armstrong, H. A. 2008. Arabia-Eurasia collision and the forcing of mid-Cenozoic global cooling. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 265, 52–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al-Syabi, H. 2005. Exploration history of the Ara intrasalt carbonate stringers in the South Oman salt basin. GeoArabia 10, 3954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballato, P., Uba, C. E., Landgraf, A., Strecker, M. R., Sudo, M., Stockli, D., Friedrich, A. & Tabatabaei, S. H. 2011. Arabia-Eurasia continental collision: insights from late Tertiary foreland-basin evolution in the Alborz Mountains, northern Iran. Geological Society of American Bulletin 123, 106–31.Google Scholar
Berberian, M. & King, G. C. P. 1981. Towards a paleogeography and tectonic evolution of Iran. Canadian Journal of Earth Science 18, 210–65.Google Scholar
Bézier, P. 1974. Mathematical and practical possibilities of UNISURF. In Computer Aided Geometric Design (eds Barnhill, R. E. & Riesenfeld, R. F.), pp. 127–52. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Buchner, W. H. 1933. The Deformation of the Earth's Crust. Princeton University Press, 518 pp.Google Scholar
Callot, J. P., Jahani, S. & Letouzey, J. 2007. The role of pre-existing diapirs in fold and thrust belt development. In Thrust Belts and Foreland Basins: From fold kinematics to hydrocarbon systems (eds Lacombe, O, Lavé, J., Verges, J. & Roure, F.), pp. 309–26. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callot, J. P., Trocmé, V., Letouzey, J., Albouy, E., Jahani, S. & Sherkati, S. In press. Pre-existing salt structures and the folding of the Zagros Mountain. In Salt Tectonics, Sediments & Prospectivity (ed. Alsop, I.). Geological Society of London, Special Publication.Google Scholar
Caumon, G. 2009. Vers une intégration des incertitudes et des processus en géologie numérique. Mémoire d'Habilitation à diriger la recherche. Université de Nancy, 158 pp.Google Scholar
Caumon, G., Antoine, C. & Tertois, A. L. 2007. Building 3D geological surfaces from field data using implicit surfaces. In Proceedings of the 27th Gocad Meeting, Nancy, 6 pp.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, R. T. 1910. The Appalachian folds of central Pennsylvania. Journal of Geology 18, 228–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlstrom, C. D. A. 1969. Balanced cross-sections. Canadian Journal of Earth Science 6, 743–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, J. A & Cook, R. W. 2003. Palinspastic reconstruction of structure maps: an automated finite element approach with heterogeneous strain. Journal of Structural Geology 26, 1021–36.Google Scholar
Durand-Riard, P., Caumon, G. & Muron, P. 2010. Balanced restoration of geological volumes with relaxed meshing constraints. Computers and Geosciences 36, 441–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fakhari, M. D., Axen, G. J., Horton, B. K., Hassanzadeh, J. & Amini, A. 2008. Revised age of proximal deposits in the Zagros foreland basin and implications for Cenozoic evolution of the High Zagros. Tectonophysics 451, 170–85.Google Scholar
Falcon, N. L. 1974. Southern Iran: Zagros mountains. In Mesozoic Orogenic–Cenozoic Belts: Data for orogenic studies (ed. Spencer, A. M.), pp. 199211. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 4.Google Scholar
Farin, G. E. 1988. Curves and surfaces for computer aided geometric design. In Geometric Modelling, Algorithms and New Trends (ed. Farin, G. E.), pp. 235–45. SIAM Publishers Co.Google Scholar
Franck, T., Tertois, A. L. & Mallet, J L. 2007. 3D-reconstruction of complex geological interfaces from irregularly spaced and noisy point data. Computers and Geosciences 33, 932–43.Google Scholar
Goguel, J. 1962. Tectonics. San Francisco: Freeman, 348 pp.Google Scholar
Galera, C., Bennis, C., Moretti, I. & Mallet, J. L. 2003. Construction of coherent 3D geological blocks. Computers and Geosciences 29, 971–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratier, J. P., Guillier, B., Delorme, A. & Odonne, F. 1991. Restoration and balance of a folded and faulted surface by best-fitting of finite elements: principle and applications. Journal of Structural Geology 13, 111–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J. 1930. The geology of some salt-plugs in Laristan, southern Persia. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 86, 463522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatzfeld, D. & Molnar, P. 2010. Comparisons of the kinematics and deep structures of the Zagros and Himalaya and of the Iranian and Tibetan plateaus and geodynamic implications. Reviews of Geophysics 48, RG2005, doi:10.1029/2009RG000304, 48 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, S. J. & McQuillan, H. 1974. Evolution of the Zagros suture zone, southern Iran. Geological Society of America Bulletin 85, 739–44.Google Scholar
Hessami, K., Koyi, H. A. & Talbot, C. J. 2001. The significance of strike-slip faulting in the basement of Zagros fold and thrust belt. Journal of Petroleum Geology 24, 528.Google Scholar
Homke, S., Vergés, J., Garcés, M., Emami, H. & Karpuz, R. 2004. Magnetostratigraphy of Miocene–Pliocene Zagros foreland deposits in the front of the Push-e Kush Arc (Lurestan Province, Iran). Earth and Planetary Science Letters 225, 397410.Google Scholar
Homke, S., Verges, J., Serra-Kiel, J., Bernaola, G., Sharp, I., Garces, M., Monteru-Verdo, I., Karpuz, R. & Goodarzi, M. H. 2009. Late Cretaceous Paleocene formation of the Proto-Zagros foreland basin, Lurestan Province, SW Iran. Geological Society of America Bulletin 121, 963–78.Google Scholar
Horton, B. K., Hassanzadeh, J., Stockli, D. F., Axen, G. J., Gillis, R. J., Guest, B., Amini, A., Fakhari, M., Zamanzadeh, S. M. & Grove, M. 2008. Detrital zircon provenance of Neoproterozoic to Cenozoic deposits in Iran: implications for chronostratigraphy and collisional tectonics. Tectonophysics 451, 97122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. P. A. & Talbot, C. J. 1991. A Glossary of Salt Tectonics. Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin, Geological Circular 91–4.Google Scholar
Jahani, S., Callot, J. P., Frizon de Lamotte, D., Letouzey, J. & Leturmy, P. 2007. The salt diapirs of the eastern Fars province (Zagros, Iran): a brief outline of their past and present. In Thrust Belts and Foreland Basins: From fold kinematics to hydrocarbon systems (eds Lacombe, O., Lavé, J., Verges, J. & Roure, F.), pp. 289308. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahani, S., Callot, J. P., Letouzey, J., Frizon de Lamotte, D. 2009. The Eastern termination of the Zagros Fold-and-Thrust Belt, Iran: structures, evolution, and relationships between salt plugs, folding, and faulting. Tectonics 28, TC6004, doi:10.1029/2008TC002418, 22 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khadivi, S., Mouthereau, F., Larrasoaña, J. C., Vergés, J., Lacombe, O., Khademi, E., Beamud, E., Melinte-Dobrinescu, M. & Suc, J.-P. 2010. Magnetochronology of synorogenic Miocene foreland sediments in the Fars arc of the Zagros Folded Belt (SW Iran). Basin Research 22, 918–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, P. E. 1958. Recent studies of south Persian salt diapirs. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 42, 2951–72.Google Scholar
Kent, P. E. 1970. The salt diapirs of the Persian Gulf region. Transactions of the Leicester Literary and Philosophical Society 64, 55–8.Google Scholar
Koop, W. J. & Stoneley, R. 1982. Subsidence history of the Middle East Zagros Basin, Permian to Recent. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A 305, 149–68.Google Scholar
Laubscher, H. P. 1962. Die Zwei phased hypothese der Jurafaltung. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae 55, 122.Google Scholar
Lacombe, O., Amrouch, K., Mouthereau, F. & Dissez, L. 2007. Calcite twinning constraints on late Neogene stress patterns and deformation mechanisms in the active Zagros collision belt. Geology 35, 263–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacombe, O., Mouthereau, F., Kargar, S. & Meyer, B. 2006. Late Cenozoic and modern stress fields in the western Fars (Iran): implications for the tectonic and kinematic evolution of central Zagros. Tectonics 25, TC1003, doi:10.1029/2005TC001831, 27 pp.Google Scholar
Letouzey, J., Colletta, B., Vially, R. & Chermette, J. C. 1995. Evolution of salt related structures in a compressional setting. In Salt Tectonics: A Global Perspective (eds Jackson, M. P. A., Roberts, D. G. & Snelson, S.), pp. 4160. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir no. 65.Google Scholar
Letouzey, J. & Sherkati, S. 2004. Salt Movement, Tectonic Events, and Structural Style in the Central Zagros Fold and Thrust Belt (Iran). Paper presented at 24th Annual GCSSEPM Foundation Bob F. Perkins Research Conference: Salt-Sediment Interactions and Hydrocarbon Prospectivity: Concepts, Applications, and Case Studies for the 21st Century, Gulf Coast Section. Houston, Texas.Google Scholar
Leturmy, P., Molinaro, M. & Frizon de Lamotte, D. 2010. Structure, timing and morphological signature of hidden reverse basement faults in the Fars Arc of the Zagros (Iran). In Tectonic and Stratigraphic Evolution of Zagros and Makran during the Mesozoic-Cenozoic (eds Leturmy, P. & Robin, C.), pp. 121–38. Geological Society of London, Special Publication no. 330.Google Scholar
Maerten, L. & Maerten, F. 2006. Chronologic modeling of faulted and fractured reservoirs using geomechanically based restoration: technique and industry applications. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 90, 1201–26.Google Scholar
Mallet, J. L. 2001. Geomodeling, Applied Geostatistics Series. New York: Oxford University Press, 599 pp.Google Scholar
Molinaro, M., Leturmy, P., Guezou, J. C., Frizon de Lamotte, D. & Eshragi, S. A. 2005. The structure and kinematics of the south-eastern Zagros fold-thrust belt, Iran: from thin-skinned to thick-skinned tectonics. Tectonics 24, TC3007, doi:10.1029/ 2004TC001633, 19 pp.Google Scholar
Mouthereau, F. 2011. Timing of uplift in the Zagros belt/Iranian plateau and accommodation of late Cenozoic Arabia–Eurasia convergence. Geological Magazine, doi:10.1017/S0016756811000306.Google Scholar
Mouthereau, F., Lacombe, O. & Meyer, B. 2006. The Zagros Folded Belt (Fars, Iran): constraints from topography and critical wedge modelling. Geophysical Journal International 165, 336–56.Google Scholar
Mouthereau, F., Tensi, J., Bellahsen, N., Lacombe, O., De Boisgrollier, T. & Kargar, S. 2007. Tertiary sequence of deformation in a thin-skinned/thick-skinned collision belt: the Zagros Folded Belt (Fars, Iran). Tectonics 26, TC5006, doi:10.1029/2007TC002098, 28 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretti, I. & Larrère, M. 1989. LOCACE: Computer-aided construction of balanced geological cross-sections. Geobyte 4, 124.Google Scholar
Moretti, I., Lepage, F. & Guiton, M. 2006. 3D Restoration: geometry and geomechanics. Oil and Gas Science and Technology 61, 277–89.Google Scholar
Motiei, H. 1995. Petroleum Geology of Zagros, 1 and 2 (in Farsi). Tehran: Geological Survey of Iran.Google Scholar
Murris, R. J. 1980. Middle East: stratigraphic evolution and oil habitat. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 64, 597618.Google Scholar
Ricou, L. E. 1971. Le croissant ophiolitique péri-arabe. Une ceinture de nappes mises en place au Crétacé supérieur. Revue de Géographie Physique et de Géologie Dynamique 13, 327–50.Google Scholar
Rouby, D., Cobbold, P. R., Szatmari, P., Demercian, S., Coelho, D. & Rici, J. A. 1993. Restoration in plan view of faulted Upper Cretaceous and Oligocene horizons and its bearing on the history of salt tectonics in the Campos Basin (Brazil). Tectonophysics 228, 435–45.Google Scholar
Rouby, D., Xiao, H. & Suppe, J. 2000. 3-D restoration of complexly folded and faulted surfaces using multiple unfolding mechanisms. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 84, 805–29.Google Scholar
Roustaei, M., Nissen, E., Abassi, M., Gholamzadeh, A., Ghorashi, M., Tatar, M., Yamini- Fard, F., Bergman, E., Jackson, J. & Parsons, B. 2010. The 2006 March 25 Fin earthquakes (Iran) – insights into the vertical extents of faulting in the Zagros Simply Folded Belt. Geophysical Journal International 181, 1275–91.Google Scholar
Rowan, M. & Kligfield, R. 1989. Cross-section restoration and balancing as an aid to seismic interpretation in extensional terrains. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 73, 955–66.Google Scholar
Rowan, M. G., Jackson, M. P. A. & Trudgill, B. D. 1999. Salt related fault families and fault welds in the northern Gulf of Mexico. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 83, 1454–84.Google Scholar
Rowan, M. G. & Vendeville, B. C. 2006. Foldbelts with early salt withdrawal and diapirism: physical model and examples from the northern Gulf of Mexico and the Flinders Ranges, Australia. Marine and Petroleum Geology 23, 871–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepher, M., Mirhashemi, S. F., & Yavari, M. 2009. Origin of the transfer faults in the Fars Folded Belt. First EAGE International Petroleum Conference, Shiraz, Iran. Oral presentation.Google Scholar
Setudehnia, A. 1978. The Mesozoic sequence in south-west Iran and adjacent areas. Journal of Petroleum Geology 1, 342.Google Scholar
Sherkati, S., Letouzey, J. & Frizon de Lamotte, D. 2006. Central Zagros fold-thrust belt (Iran): new insights from seismic data, field observation, and sandbox modeling, Tectonics 25, TC4007, doi:10.1029/2004TC001766, 27 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocklin, J. 1974. Possible ancient continental margin in Iran. In Geology of the Continental Margin (eds Burk, C. A. & Drake, C. L.), pp. 873–87. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Suppe, J. 1983. Geometry and kinematics of fault-bend folding. American Journal of Science 283, 684721.Google Scholar
Szabo, F. & Kheradpir, A. 1978. Permian and Triassic stratigraphy, Zagros basin, south-west Iran. Journal of Petroleum Geology 1, 5782.Google Scholar