Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:30:33.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fixation probability in spatially changing environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Hidenori Tachida  and
Masaru Iizuka
Hidenori Tachida*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka-ken 411, Japan
Masaru Iizuka
Affiliation:
General Education Course, Chikushi Jogakuen Junior College, Ishizaka 2-12-1, Dazaifu-shi, Fukuoka-ken 818-01, Japan
*
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The fixation probability of a mutant in a subdivided population with spatially varying environments is investigated using a finite island model. This probability is different from that in a panmictic population if selection is intermediate to strong and migration is weak. An approximation is used to compute the fixation probability when migration among subpopulations is very weak. By numerically solving the two-dimensional partial differential equation for the fixation probability in the two subpopulation case, the approximation was shown to give fairly accurate values. With this approximation, we show in the case of two subpopulations that the fixation probability in subdivided populations is greater than that in panmictic populations mostly. The increase is most pronounced when the mutant is selected for in one subpopulation and is selected against in the other subpopulation. Also it is shown that when there are two types of environments, further subdivision of subpopulations does not cause much change of the fixation probability in the no dominance case unless the product of the selection coefficient and the local population size is less than one. With dominance, the effect of subdivision becomes more complex.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , December 1991 , pp. 243 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

References

Crow, J. F. & Kimura, M. (1970). An Introduction to Population Genetic Theory. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. J. & Levene, H. (1955). Genetics of natural populations. XXIV. Developmental homeostasis in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 40, 779–808.Google ScholarPubMed
Dykhuizen, D. E. & Hartl, D. L. (1980). Selective neutrality of 6PGD allozymes in E. coli and the effects of genetic background. Genetics 96, 801–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, J. H. (1983). Some properties of finite populations experiencing strong selection and weak mutation. American Naturalist 121, 691–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartl, D. L. & Dykhuizen, D. E. (1984). The population genetics of Escherichia coli. Annual Review of Genetics 18, 31–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iizuka, M. & Ogura, Y. (1991). Convergence of onedimensional diffusion processes to a jump process related to population genetics. Journal of Mathematical Biology 29, 671–687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, L. (1973). Random selection advantages of genes and their probability of fixation. Genetical Research 21, 215–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlin, S. & Levikson, B. (1974). Temporal fluctuations in selection intensities: Case of small population size. Theoretical Population Biology 6, 383–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlin, S. & Taylor, H. M. (1981). A Second Course in Stochastic Processes. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kimura, M. (1962). On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics 47, 713–719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, M. (1983). The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lande, R. (1979). Effective deme sizes during long-term evolution estimated from rates of chromosomal rearrangement. Evolution 33, 234–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lande, R. (1985). The fixation of chromosomal rearrangements in a subdivided population with local extinction and colonization. Heredity 54, 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, W.-H. (1987). Models of nearly neutral mutations with particular implications for nonrandom usage of synonymous codon. Journal of Molecular Evolution 24, 337–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maruyama, T. (1970 a). On the fixation probability of mutant genes in a subdivided population. Genetical Research 15, 221–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maruyama, T. (1970 b). Analysis of population structure. I. One-dimensional stepping-stone models of finite length. Annals of Human Genetics, London 34, 201–219.Google Scholar
Maruyama, T. (1972). Some invariant properties of a geographically structured finite population: distribution of heterozygotes under irreversible mutation. Genetical Research 20, 141–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagylaki, T. (1980). The strong-migration limit in geographically structured populations. Journal of Mathematical Biology 9, 101–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogura, Y. (1989). One-dimensional bi-generalized diffusion processes. Journal of Mathematical Society of Japan 41, 213–242.Google Scholar
Ohta, T. (1972). Fixation probability of a mutant influenced by random fluctuation of selective intensity. Genetical Research 19, 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, J. M. & Poole, W. G Jr. (1981). An Introduction to Numerical Methods for Differential Equations. Marshfield,Massachusetts: Pitman Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
Pollak, E. (1966). On the survival of a gene in a subdivided population. Journal of Applied Probability 3, 142–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slatkin, M. (1981). Fixation probabilities and fixation times in a subdivided population. Evolution 35, 477–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tachida, H. (1990). A population genetic model of selection that maintains specific trinucleotides at a specific location. Journal of Molecular Evolution 31, 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tachida, H. & Mukai, T. (1985). The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. XIX. Genotype-environment interaction in viability. Genetics 111, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takahata, N. 1990. A simple genealogical structure of strongly balanced allelic lines and trans-species evolution of polymorphism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 87, 2419–2423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takahata, N.Ishii, K. & Matsuda, H. (1975). Effect of temporal fluctuation of selection coefficient on gene frequency in a population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 72, 4541–4545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takano, T.Kusakabe, S.-I. & Mukai, T. (1987). The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. XX. Comparison of genotype-environment interaction in viability between a northern and a southern population. Genetics 117, 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, Z. B.Tachida, H. & Cockerham, C. C. (1989). Effects of mutation on selection limits in finite populations with multiple alleles. Genetics 122, 977–984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed