Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:16:01.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence for a new kind of regulatory gene controlling expression of genes for morphogenesis during the cell cycle in Ustilago violacea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

A. W. Day  and
J. E. Cummins
A. W. Day
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
J. E. Cummins
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The first part of the paper provides strong supportive evidence for the previous findings (Cummins & Day, 1973; Day & Cummins, 1973) that the two alleles of the mating-type locus of the basidiomycete Ustilago violacea have different periods of inducibility during a cell cycle, and that the cell cycle characteristics of each allele are maintained in freshly isolated diploids. This difference in temporal properties of the alleles appears to be the basis of the dominance of allele a2 as it is inducible during a phase of the cell cycle when allele a1 is non-inducible. During G1 both alleles appear to be inducible and apparently ‘neutralize’ each other so that the cell cannot mate.

The second part of the paper provides evidence for a unique genetic control mechanism. The evidence suggests that the period of cell cycle inducibility of a locus governing a morphogenetic pathway may be regulated by a separate control gene the cc locus, with two known alleles ccstr(a stringent or restricted period of inducibility) and ccrel (a relaxed or non-restricted period of inducibility). This hypothesis stems from analysis of a diploid that was a1· ccstr/a2· ccrel and showed dominance of allele a2 during the S and G2 phases when freshly isolated, but which became incapable of mating after a period of subculturing. Analysis of haploids derived from this diploid strain showed that both mating-type alleles were functional but that it was now homozygous for ccstr, i.e. of genotype a1· ccstr/a2·ccstr· Thus the temporal and functional aspects of the mating type alleles are determined by different loci. It is postulated that cell cycle control loci may be widespread and serve to regulate the action of genes concerned with morphogenesis in relation to other cell cycle events.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , June 1975 , pp. 253 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

References

REFERENCES

Beerman, W. (1972). Chromosomes and genes. In Developmental Studies on Giant Chromosomes (ed. Beerman, W.), pp. 1–31. Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britten, R. & Davidson, E. (1969). Gene regulation for higher cells: a theory. Science, 165, 349–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, K. (1956). A study of the conditions and mechanism of the diphenylamine reaction for the colorimetric estimation of DNA. Biochemical Journal 62, 315–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, F. (1971). A general model for the chromosomes of higher organisms. Nature 234, 25–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cummins, J. E. & Day, A. W. (1973). Cell cycle regulation of mating-type alleles in the smut fungus, Ustilago violacea. Nature 245, 259–260,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J. E. & Day, A. W. (1974 a). Transcription and translation of the sex message in the smut fungus, Ustilago violacea. II. The effects of inhibitors. Journal of Cell Science 16, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cummins, J. E. & Day, A. W. (1974 b). The cell cycle regulation of sexual morphogenesis in a basidiomycete Ustilago violacea. In Cell Cycle Controls (ed. Padilla, G. M., Cameron, I. L. and Zimmerman, A.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Day, A. W. (1972). The isolation and identification of polyploid strains of Ustilago violacea. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 14, 925–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, A. W. & Cummins, J. E. (1973). Temporal allelic interaction, a new kind of dominance. Nature 245, 260–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Day, A. W. & Cummins, J. E. (1974). Transcription and translation of the sex message in the smut fungus, Ustilago violacea. I. The effect of ultraviolet light. Journal of Cell Science 14, 451–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Day, A. W. & Jones, J. K. (1968). The production and characteristics of diploids of Ustilago violacea. Genetical Research 11, 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, A. W. & Jones, J. K. (1969). Sexual and parasexual analysis of Ustilago violacea. Genetical Research 14, 195–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Day, A. W. & Jones, J. K. (1972). Somatic nuclear division in the sporidia of Ustilago violacea. I. Acetic orcein staining. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 18, 663–670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Day, A. W. & Poon, N. H. (1975). Fungal fimbriae. II. Their role in conjugation in Ustilago violacea. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 21, 547–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donachie, W. D. & Masters, M. (1969). Temporal control of gene expression in bacteria. In The Cell Cycle: Gene–Enzyme Interactions (ed. Padilla, G. M., Whitson, G. L. and Cameron, I. L.), pp. 37–76. New York, London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esposito, R. & Holliday, R. (1964). The effect of 5-fluorodeoxyuridine on genetic replication and mitotic crossing over in synchronized cultures of Ustilago maydis. Genetics 50, 1009–1017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, R. A. (1931). The evolution of dominance. American Naturalist 68, 370–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelfant, S. (1962). Initiation of mitosis in relation to the cell division cycle. Experimental Cell Research 26, 395–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, B. C. (1966). An entrainment model for timed enzyme synthesis in bacteria. Nature 209, 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haldane, J. B. (1939). Physiological and evolutionary theories of dominance. American Naturalist 68, 24–53.Google Scholar
Halvorson, H. O., Carter, B. L. A. & Tauro, P. (1971). Synthesis of enzymes during the cell cycle. Advances in Microbial Physiology 6, 47–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hereford, L. & Hartwell, L. (1974). Sequential gene function in the initiation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA synthesis. Journal of Molecular Biology 84, 445–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Masters, M. & Pardee, A. B. (1965). Sequence of enzyme synthesis and gene replication during the cell cycle of Bacillus subtilis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 54, 64–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchison, J. M. (1971). The Biology of the Cell Cycle. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paul, J. (1972). Organization of eukaryote chromosomes. Nature 238, 444–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poon, N. H. & Day, A. W. (1974). Somatic nuclear division in Ustilago violacea. II. Observations on living cells with phase contrast and fluorescence microscopy. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 20, 739–746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poon, N. H., Martin, J. & Day, A. W. (1974). Conjugation in Ustilago violacea. I. Morphology. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 20, 187–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williamson, D. H. & Scopes, A. W. (1960). The behaviour of nucleic acids in synchronously dividing cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Experimental Cell Research 20, 338–349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williamson, D. H. & Scopes, A. W. (1962). A rapid method for synchronising division in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 193, 256–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar