Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:14:00.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamics of polygenic variability under stabilizing selection, recombination, and drift

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2009

Sergey Gavrilets  and
Alan Hasting
Sergey Gavrilets
Affiliation:
Division of Environmental Studies, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 N. I. Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, 3, Gubkin St., 117809 GSP-1, Moscow B-333, Russia
Alan Hasting*
Affiliation:
Division of Environmental Studies, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 Institute for Theoretical Dynamics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
*
* Corresponding author: Aian Hastings, Division of Environmental Studies, University of California, Davis, CA 95616. FAX: (916) 752-3350. Phone: (916) 752-8116. e-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We study the transient dynamics of the genotypic variance of an additive trait under stabilizing selection, recombination and random drift. We show how interaction of these factors determines the form and the rates of change of different components of the genotypic variance. Let Vg be the genie variance of the trait and CL be the contribution of linkage disequilibrium to the genotypic variance. We demonstrate that the dynamics of the system on the plane (Vg, CL) are typically characterized by a quick approach to a straight line with slow evolution along this line afterwards. We show that the number of loci, n, and the population size, N, affect the expected dynamics of Vg mainly through the ratio N/n. We use our analytical and numerical results in interpreting the published results of artificial stabilizing selection experiments. The analysis suggests that it is drift and not selection that most likely led to the reduction of genetic variability in most of these experiments. Even very strong stabilizing selection only slowly removes polygenic variability from populations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Genetics Research , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , February 1995 , pp. 63 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

References

Barton, N. H., (1989). The divergence of a polygenic systems subject to stabilizing selection, mutation and drift. Genetical Research 54, 59–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barton, N. H., & Turelli, M., (1991). Natural and sexual selection on many loci. Genetics 121, 229–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bos, M., & Scharloo, W., (1973). The effects of disruptive and stabilizing selection on body size in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 75, 679–693.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulmer, M., (1971). The effects of selection on genetic variability. American Naturalist 105, 210–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulmer, M., (1972). The genetic variability of polygenic characters under optimizing selection, mutation and drift. Genetical Research 19, 17–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bulmer, M., (1974). Linkage disequilibrium and genetic variability. Genetical Research 23, 281–289.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M., (1980). The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bürger, R., Wagner, G. P., & Stettinger, F., (1989). How much heritable variation can be maintained in finite populations by mutation-selection balance? Evolution 43, 1748–1766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chevalet, C., (1988). Control of genetic drift in selected populations. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Quantitative Genetics (ed. Weir, B. S., Eisen, E. J., Godman, M. M. and Namkong, G.), pp. 379–394. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Ewens, W. E., & Thomson, G., (1977). Properties of equilibria in multilocus genetic systems. Genetics 87, 809–819.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A., (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S., (1957). Selection for phenotypic intermediates in Drosophila. Journal of Genetics 55, 551–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, J. S., & Kearsey, M. J., (1968). Stable equilibria under stabilizing selection in the absence of dominance. Heredity 23, 553–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavrilets, S., (1993). Equilibria in an epistatic viability model under arbitrary strength of selection. Journal of Mathematical Biology 31, 397–410.Google Scholar
Gavrilets, S., & Hastings, A., (1993). Maintenance of genetic variability under strong stabilizing selection: a two locus model. Genetics 134, 377–386.Google Scholar
Gavrilets, S., & Hastings, A., (1994 a). Maintenance of multilocus variability under strong stabilizing selection. Journal of Mathematical Biology 32, 287–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gavrilets, S., & Hastings, A., (1994 b). A quantitative genetic model for selection on developmental noise. Evolution (in the press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavrilets, S., & Hastings, A., (1994 c). Dynamics of genetic variability in two-locus models of stabilizing selection. Genetics 138, 519–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, J. B., & Thoday, M. M., (1963). Effects of disruptive selection. VIII. Imposed quasi-random mating. Heredity 18, 513–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, J. B., & Bradley, B. P., (1974). Stabilizing selection in constant and fluctuating environments. Heredity 33, 293–302.Google Scholar
Gimelfarb, A., (1992). Pleiotropy and multilocus polymorphism. Genetics 130, 223–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastings, A., (1987). Substitution rates under stabilizing selection. Genetics 116, 479–486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, W. G., (1982). Predictions of response to artificial selection from new mutations. Genetical Research 40, 255–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, W. G., & Caballero, A., (1992). Artificial selection experiments. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23, 287–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppenstead, F. C., (1976). A slow selection analysis of two locus, two allele traits. Theoretical Population Biology 9, 68–81.Google Scholar
Kaufman, P. F., Enfield, F. D., & Comstock, R. E., (1977). Stabilizing selection for pupa weight in Tribolium castaneum. Genetics 87, 327–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kearsey, M. J., & Gale, J. S., (1968). Stabilizing selection in the absence of dominance: an additional note. Heredity 23, 617–620.Google Scholar
Keightley, P. D., & Hill, W. G., (1987). Directional selection and variation in finite populations. Genetics 117, 573–582.Google Scholar
Keightley, P. D., & Hill, W. G., (1988). Quantitative genetic variability maintained by mutation-stabilizing selection balance in finite populations. Genetical Research 52, 33–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewontin, R. C., (1964). The interaction of selection and linkage. II. Optimal model. Genetics 50, 757–782.Google Scholar
Mather, K., (1941). Variation and selection of polygenic characters. Journal of Genetics 41, 159–193.Google Scholar
Nagylaki, T., (1976). The evolution of one- and two-locus systems. Genetics 83, 583–600.Google Scholar
Nagylaki, T., (1977). The evolution of one- and two-locus systems. II. Genetics 85, 347–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagylaki, T., (1978). Selection in one- and two-Locus Systems. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Nagylaki, T., (1989). The maintenance of genetic variability in two-locus models of stabilizing selection. Genetics 122, 235–248.Google Scholar
Nagylaki, T., (1992). Introduction to Theoretical Population Biology. Berlin, Heidelberg N.Y.: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagylaki, T., (1993). The evolution of multilocus systems under weak selection. Genetics 134, 627–647.Google Scholar
Prout, T., (1962). The effect of stabilizing selection on the time of development in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetical Research 3, 364–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A., (1956). The effect of selection against extreme deviants based on deviation or on homozygosis. Journal of Genetics 54, 236–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharloo, W., (1964). The effect of disruptive and stabilizing selection on the expression of a cubitus interruptus mutant in Drosophila. Genetics 50, 553–562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scharloo, W., Hoogmoed, M. S., & Ter Kuile, A., (1967). Stabilizing and disruptive selection on a mutant character in Drosophila. I. The phenotypic variance and its components. Genetics 56, 709–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soliman, M. H., (1982). Directional and stabilizing selection for developmental time and correlated response in reproductive fitness in Tribolium castaneum. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 63, 111–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tantaway, A. O., & Tayel, A. A., (1970). Studies on natural population of Drosophila. X. Effects of disruptive and stabilizing selection on wing length and correlated response in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 65, 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoday, J. M., (1959). Effects of disruptive selection. I. Genetic flexibility. Heredity 13, 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turelli, M., & Barton, N. H., (1990). Dynamics of polygenic characters under selection. Theoretical Population Biology 38, 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, B. S., Eisen, E. J., Godman, M. M., & Namkong, G. (eds) (1988). Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Quantitative Genetics. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Wright, S., (1935). Evolution in populations in approximate equilibrium. Journal of Genetics 30, 257–266.Google Scholar
Zhivotovsky, L., & Gavrilets, S., (1992). Quantitative variability and multilocus polymorphism under epistatic selection. Theoretical Population Biology 42, 254–283.Google Scholar