Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T07:22:59.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Information asymmetries and conflict of interest during the Baring crisis, 1880–18901

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2011

Juan H. Flores*
Affiliation:
University of Geneva and Figuerola Institute of History and Social Sciences, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

Abstract

This article examines the potential conflict of interest of underwriters in London's foreign sovereign debt markets prior to the Baring crisis of 1890. We describe the main sources of information for investors concerning Argentina, whose government debt default contributed to Baring's collapse, and compare them with those of the underwriters, particularly Baring's. We then present some empirical evidence using data on bond prices and underwriting fees that demonstrate that Baring did not exploit its information lead to the detriment of investors. Finally, we present historical evidence that shows that Baring foresaw default before markets did and consequently planned a bailout loan that could not be issued due to political instability in Buenos Aires.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © European Association for Banking and Financial History e.V. 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This paper has been presented at several events. I would like to thank the following people for the comments they offered on previous versions: Marc Flandreau, Stefano Battilossi, Michael Bordo, Gerardo Della Paolera, Pablo Martin Aceña, Sebastian Nieto, Jérôme Sgard, and participants at the EHESS meeting in Istanbul 2005, the LACEA Meeting in Mexico 2006, the OFCE Seminar of Economic History in April 2007, the APHE Meeting in Lisbon in November 2007, the First Euro-Clio Conference and Fast-Track Initiative ‘Exchanges in economic history’ in Paris 2008, and the Globalization and History Conference in UCLA in April 2009. Comments made by the editor and anonymous referees were most useful. I would also like to thank the archivists at ING Baring, Archives Paribas, Crédit Lyonnais and the Rothschild archives. Financial support from the Ministry of Education and Science in Spain through the Consolider project CSD 2006-00016 is also acknowledged. I am solely responsible for any remaining errors.

References

References

Ang, J. S. and Richardson, T. (1994). The underwriting experience of commercial bank affiliates prior to the Glass-Steagall Act: a re-examination of evidence for passage of the act. Journal of Banking and Finance, 18, pp. 351–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertino, M. and Bertoni, R. (2004). Más de un siglo de deuda pública uruguaya: una historia de ida y vuelta. Nordic Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 34, pp. 123–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bértola, L. (1998). El PBI de Uruguay, 1870–1936, y otras estimaciones. Documento de Trabajo 7/98, Unidad Multidisciplinaria-Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de la Republica. Montevideo, Uruguay.Google Scholar
Blattman, C., Hwang, J. and Williamson, J. G. (2004). The impact of the terms of trade on economic development in the periphery, 1870–1939: volatility and secular change. NBER Working Paper 10600, National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, P., Freixas, X. and Shapiro, J. (2007). Conflicts of interest, information provision, and competition in the financial services industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 85, pp. 297330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordo, M. and Rockoff, H. (1996). The gold standard as a ‘Good Housekeeping seal of approval’. Journal of Economic History, 56, pp. 389428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, J., Braun, M., Briones, I. and Díaz, J. (2000). Economía chilena 1810–1995: estadísticas históricas. Documento de Trabajo 187, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago.Google Scholar
Cairncross, A. K. (1953). Home and Foreign Investment, 1870–1913: Studies in Capital Accumulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, G., Gai, P. and Yong Tan, K. (2009). Sovereign risk in the classical gold standard, The Economic Record, 85, pp. 401–16.Google Scholar
Carmagnani, M. (1994). Estado y mercado: la economía pública del liberalismo mexicano, 1850–1911. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Carter, R. B. and Manaster, S. (1990). Initial public offerings and underwriter reputation. Journal of Finance, 45, pp. 1045–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerro, A. M. (2000). La conducta cíclica de la economía argentina y el comportamiento del dinero en el ciclo económico. Argentina 1820–1998. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Clarke, H. (1878). On the debt of sovereign and quasi-sovereign states, owing by foreign countries. Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 41/2, pp. 299347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohan, A. B. (1961). Cost of Flotation of Long-Term Corporate Debt. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Cortes Conde, R. (1979). El progreso Argentino 1880–1994. Buenos Aires: Ed. Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Cortes Conde, R. (1989). Dinero, deuda y crisis: evolución fiscal y monetaria en la Argentina, 1862–1890. Buenos Aires: Ed. Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Costeloe, M. P. (2003). Bonds and Bondholders, British Investors and Mexico's Foreign Debt, 1824–1888. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Della Paolera, G. (1988). How the Argentine economy performed during the international gold standard: a re-examination. PhD Dissertation: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Della Paolera, G. (1994). Monetary and banking experiments in Argentina, 1861–1930. Universidad Torcuato di Tella Working Paper 11.Google Scholar
Della Paolera, G. and Taylor, A. (2001). Straining at the Anchor: The Argentine Currency Board and the Search for Macroeconomic Stability, 1880–1935. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dritsas, M. (1993). Foreign capital and Greek development in a historical perspective. Uppsala Papers in Economic History, Working Paper no.10.Google Scholar
Duncan, T. (1984). La política fiscal durante el gobierno de Juarez Célman, 1886–1890. Desarrollo Económico, 23, pp. 1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichengreen, B. (1999). The Baring crisis in a Mexican mirror. International Political Science Review, 20, pp. 249–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenn, C. (1887). Fenn on the Funds. London: Effingham Wilson.Google Scholar
Ferguson, N. (1998). The World's Banker: The History of the House of Rothschild. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
Ferns, H. S. (1960). Britain and Argentina in the Nineteenth Century. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ferns, H. S. (1992). The Baring crisis revisited. Journal of Latin American Studies, 24, pp. 241–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flandreau, M. (1998). Caveat emptor: coping with sovereign risk without the multilaterals. CEPR Discussion Paper 2004.Google Scholar
Flandreau, M. (2003). Crises and punishment: moral hazard and the pre-1914 international financial architecture. CEPR Discussion Paper 3742.Google Scholar
Flandreau, M. and Flores, J. (2009). Bonds and brands: lessons from the 1820s. Journal of Economic History, 69, pp. 646–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flandreau, M. and Flores, J. (2010), Hamlet without the Prince of Denmark: relationship banking and conditionality lending in the London market for government debt, 1815–1913. CEPR Discussion Paper 7915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flandreau, M., Flores, J. H., Gaillard, N. and Nieto-Parra, S. (2009a). The end of gatekeeping: underwriters and the quality of sovereign bond markets, 1815–2007. NBER Working Paper 15128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flandreau, M., Flores, J. H., Gaillard, N. and Nieto-Parra, S. (2009b). Two centuries of government bond underwriting, mimeo.Google Scholar
Flandreau, M., Gaillard, N. and Panizza, U. (2010). Conflicts of interest, reputation, and the interwar debt crisis: banksters or bad luck? HEID Working Paper 02/2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flandreau, M. and Zumer, F. (2004). The Making of Global Finance, 1880–1913. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Flores, J. (2004). Lorsque le leader suit la foule: la crise Baring dans une perspective microéconomique. PhD dissertation, Sciences-Po, Paris.Google Scholar
Flores, J. (2010). Lending booms, underwriting and financial intermediaries. Law and Contemporary Problems, 73, pp. 129–50.Google Scholar
Ford, A. G. (1962). The Gold Standard, 1880–1914: Britain and Argentina. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ford, A. G. (1971). British investment in Argentina and long swings. Journal of Economic History, 31, pp. 650–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandes, A., Puri, M. and Saunders, A. (1999). Bank entry, competition and the market for corporate securities underwriting. Journal of Financial Economics, 54, pp. 165–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girault, R. (1973). Emprunts russes et investissements français en Russie, 1887–1914. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Jenks, L. H. (1927), The Migration of British Capital to 1875. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Jones, C. A. (1972). European bankers and Argentina, 1880–1890. Working Papers Business Imperialism Series, Centre of Latin American Studies, University of Cambridge, 3.Google Scholar
Joslin, D. (1963). A Century of Banking in Latin America: to Commemorate the Centenary in 1962 of the Bank of London & South America Limited. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, C. P. (1978). Manias, Panics, and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klovland, J. T. (1994). Pitfalls in the estimation of the yield on British Consols, 1850–1914. Journal of Economic History, 54, pp. 164–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klovland, J. T. (2004). Bond markets and bond yields in Norway 1820–2003. In Eitrheim, Ø., Klovland, J. T. and Qvigstad, J. F. (eds.), Historical Monetary Statistics for Norway 1819–2003. Norges Bank Occasional Papers no. 35. Oslo: Norges Bank.Google Scholar
Liedtke, R. (2006). N. M. Rothschild & Sons: Die Kommunikation in Bannkenwesen im Europa des 19. Jahrhunderts. Cologne: Böhlau Verlag.Google Scholar
Livingston, M., Pratt, H. and Mann, C. (1995). Drexel, Burnham, Lambert's debt issues. Journal of Fixed Income, 5, pp. 5875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marichal, C. (1984). Los banqueros europeos y los empréstitos argentinos: rivalidad y colaboracion, 1880–1890. Revista de Historia Economica, 2, pp. 4782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauro, P., Sussman, N. and Yafeh, Y. (2006). Emerging Markets and Financial Globalization Sovereign Bond Spreads in 1870–1913 and Today. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meissner, C. (2005). A new world order: explaining the international diffusion of the gold standard, 1870–1913. Journal of International Economics, 66, pp. 385406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melnik, A. and Nissim, D. (2006). Issue costs in the Eurobond market: the effects of market integration. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30, pp. 157–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelson, M. (1968). Determinants of underwriters’ spreads on tax-exempt bond issues: comment. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 3, pp. 215–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulhall, M. G. (1886a). Handbook of the River Plate. Buenos Aires: Buenos Ayres Standard.Google Scholar
Mulhall, M. G. (1886b). Mulhall's Dictionary of Statistics. London: G. Routledge and Sons.Google Scholar
Nieto-Parra, S. (2009). Who saw sovereign debt crises coming? Economia, 10, pp. 125–69.Google Scholar
Obstfeld, M. and Taylor, A. M. (2003). Sovereign risk, credibility and the gold standard: 1870–1913 versus 1925–31. Economic Journal. 113, pp. 241–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puri, M. (1996). Comercial banks in investment banking: conflict of interest or certification role? Journal of Financial Economics, 40, pp. 370401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, J., Schwarzer, O. and Denzel, A. (1997). Währungen der Welt, vol. VII. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Stone, I. (1999). The Global Capital Export from Great Britain, 1865–1914: A Statistical Survey. New York: St Martin's Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, T. (1994). Japanese Government Loan Issues on the London Capital Market, 1870–1913. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Tomz, M. (2007). Reputation and international cooperation: Sovereign Debt Across Three Centuries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
West, R. (1967). Determinants of underwriters’ spreads on tax-exempt bond issues. Journal of Financial and Quantitative analysis, 2, pp. 241–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirth, M. (1893). The crisis of 1890. Journal of Political Economy, 1, pp. 214–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, P. (1988). The Sixth Great Power: Barings, 1762-1929. London: Collins.Google Scholar

Sources

Annual Reports of the Council of the Corporation of Foreign Bondholders (London: 1883-93).Google Scholar
Burdett's Stock Market Official Intelligence (London, 1880–90).Google Scholar
Crédit Lyonnais’ Historical Archives: Boxes DEEF 73404-8 and DEEF 73415 (Paris).Google Scholar
Departamento de Hacienda. Memoria del departamento de Hacienda presentada al Honorable Congreso Nacional. Buenos Aires: Sud-América, 1880–93.Google Scholar
Kurt, Schuler (ed.), ‘Historical financial statistics: data notes’, original version 24 April 2010; updated version of June 2010 viewed at Historical Financial Statistics Website, www.centerforfinancialstability.org/hfs_data.php.Google Scholar
ING Baring Archives: Box Hc4.1.71, Box Hc4 1.113. Ledgers, 1883-93 (London).Google Scholar
Paribas Archives: 102.955, Box 404 (Paris).Google Scholar
Statesman Yearbook (London, 1885–90).Google Scholar
The Economist supplement: Investors’ Monthly Manual (London: various years)Google Scholar