Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:52:24.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Value models: Finance, risk, and political economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Brett Christophers*
Affiliation:
Uppsala University, Sweden
*
Corresponding author: Brett Christophers, Department of Social and Economic Geography, Uppsala University, Box 513, 751 20 Uppsala, Sweden. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article develops a basic typological framework for understanding and analyzing financial risk from a political economy perspective. It is motivated by growing awareness of the contemporary significance of financial risk and by the fact that the political-economic literature on such risk currently lacks a workable heuristic. The framework distinguishes between and fleshes out what I refer to as the principal ‘value models’ of finance: fees, gains, premia, and spreads. Its primary aim is to facilitate the identification and conceptualization of: (1) the different risk configurations characterizing the heterogeneous political economy of finance; and (2) the different ways in which key stakeholders — such as finance capital, non-financial capital, and labor — come to be enrolled in such configurations. It also aims to contribute to the wider project of demystifying not just financial risk in particular but modern finance more generally.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© 2015 The Author(s)

References

Acharya, V. V., Schnabl, P. and Suarez, G. (2013) Securitization without risk transfer. Journal of Financial Economics, 107(3): 515–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Express Company (2013) Annual Report 2013. Available at: <http://ir.americanexpress.com/Cache/1001185312.PDF?Y=&0=PDF&D=&FID=1001185312&T=&IID=102700/>. Accessed 18 November 2015..+Accessed+18+November+2015.>Google Scholar
Arrighi, G. (1994) The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Ashton, P. and Christophers, B. (2015) On arbitration, arbitrage and arbitrariness in financial markets and their governance: Unpacking LIBOR and the LIBOR scandal. Economy and Society, 44(2): 188217.Google Scholar
Baker, T. and Simon, J. (2002) Embracing Risk: The Changing Culture of Insurance and Responsibility. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (2009) World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Binham, C. (2010) Turner plan on ‘socially useless’ trades make bankers see red. Bloomberg News, 7 January. Available at: <http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aKeO6gsaeQ_M>. Accessed 18 November 2015..+Accessed+18+November+2015.>Google Scholar
Boot, A. and Thakor, A. (1997) Financial system architecture. Review of Financial Studies, 10(3): 693733.Google Scholar
Bryan, D. and Rafferty, M. (2006) Capitalism with Derivatives: A Political Economy of Financial Derivatives. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Cetorelli, N. and Peristiani, S. (2012) The role of banks in asset securitization. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, 18(2): 4764.Google Scholar
Christophers, B. (2009) Complexity, finance, and progress in human geography. Progress in Human Geography, 33(6): 807–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christophers, B. (2013) Banking Across Boundaries: Placing Finance in Capitalism. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Christophers, B. (2015) Against (the idea of) financial markets. Geoforum, 66: 8593.Google Scholar
Christophers, B. (2016) Petals not thorns: Competition policy and finance. In: Dorn, N. (ed.) Controlling Capital: Public and Private Regulation of Financial Markets. London: Routledge. 5974.Google Scholar
Christophers, B., and Niedt, C. (2015) Resisting devaluation: Foreclosure, eminent domain law, and the geographical political economy of risk. Environment and Planning A, DOI: 10.1177/0308518X15610579.Google Scholar
Cohan, W. (2012) Wall Street turned crisis into a cartel. Bloomberg News, 9 January. Available at: <http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2012-01-09/cohan-how-wall-street-turned-a-crisis-into-a-cartel/>. Accessed 18 November 2015..+Accessed+18+November+2015.>Google Scholar
Crotty, J., Epstein, G. and Levina, I. (2010) Proprietary Trading is a Bigger Deal Than Many Bankers and Pundits Claim. Available at: <http://www.peri.umass.edu/fileadmin/pdf/other_publication_types/SAFERbriefs/SAFER_note15.pdf/>. Accessed 18 November 2015..+Accessed+18+November+2015.>Google Scholar
Curran, D. (2015) Risk illusion and organized irresponsibility in contemporary finance: Rethinking class and risk society. Economy and Society, 44(3): 392417.Google Scholar
Ellis, K., Michaely, R. and O'Hara, M. (2002) The making of a dealer market: From entry to equilibrium in the trading of Nasdaq stocks. The Journal of Finance, 57(5): 2289–316.Google Scholar
Engelen, E., Erturk, I., Froud, J., Leaver, A. and Williams, K. (2010) Reconceptualizing financial innovation: Frame, conjuncture and bricolage. Economy and Society, 39(1): 3363.Google Scholar
Erturk, I., and Solari, S. (2007) Banks as continuous reinvention. New Political Economy, 12(3): 369–88.Google Scholar
Flood, C. (2014) End ‘heads we win, tails you lose’ fees. The Financial Times, 16 November.Google Scholar
French, S. and Leyshon, A. (2004) The new, new financial system? Towards a conceptualization of financial reintermediation. Review of International Political Economy, 11(2): 263–88.Google Scholar
Froud, J., Haslam, C., Johal, S. and Williams, K. (2000) Shareholder value and financialization: Consultancy promises, management moves. Economy and Society, 29(1): 80110.Google Scholar
GlencoreXstrata (2013) Annual Report 2013. Available at: <http://www.glencore.com/assets/Uploads/reports_and_results/glencore/2013/GLEN-2013-Annual-Report.pdf/>. Accessed 18 November 2015..+Accessed+18+November+2015.>Google Scholar
Gondat-Larralde, C. and Nier, E. (2004) The economics of retail banking: An empirical analysis of the UK market for personal current accounts. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Spring. Available at: <http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Documents/quarterlybulletin/qb040203.pdf/>. Accessed 18 November 2015..+Accessed+18+November+2015.>Google Scholar
Green, S. (2000) Negotiating with the future: The culture of modern risk in global financial markets. Environment and Planning D, 18(1): 7790.Google Scholar
Guyer, J. (2009) Composites, fictions, and risk: toward an ethnography of price. In: Hann, C. and Hart, K. (eds.) Market and Society: The Great Transformation Today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 203–20.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. (2006) The Great Risk Shift. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (1982) The Limits to Capital. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hilferding, R. (2006/1910) Finance Capital: A Study in the Latest Phase of Capitalist Development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnson, L. (2013) Catastrophe bonds and financial risk: Securing capital and rule through contingency. Geoforum, 45: 3040.Google Scholar
Kay, J. (2012) It is time to end the oligopoly in banking. The Financial Times, 8 May.Google Scholar
Kiff, J., Elliott, J., Kazarian, E., Scarlata, J. and Spackman, C. (2009) Credit derivatives: systemic risks and policy options. IMF Working Paper Series, 09/254. Available at: <http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2009/wp09254.pdf/>. Accessed 18 November 2015.Google Scholar
Knight, F. (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. New York, NY: Hart, Schaffner and Marx.Google Scholar
Lanchester, J. (2013) Are we having fun yet? London Review of Books, 35(13): 38.Google Scholar
Levy, J. (2012) Freaks of Fortune: The Emerging World of Capitalism and Risk in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leyshon, A. and Thrift, N. (1996) Financial exclusion and the shifting boundaries of the financial system. Environment and Planning A, 28(7): 1150–56.Google Scholar
LiPuma, E. and Lee, B. (2004) Financial Derivatives and the Globalization of Risk. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Macartney, H. (2014) From Merlin to Oz: The strange case of failed lending targets in the UK. Review of International Political Economy, 21(4): 820–46.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. (2013) The magic lever. London Review of Books, 35(9): 1619.Google Scholar
Markowitz, H. (1952) Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1): 7791.Google Scholar
Marron, D. (2007) ‘Lending by numbers’: Credit scoring and the constitution of risk within American consumer credit. Economy and Society, 36(1): 103133.Google Scholar
Martin, R., Rafferty, M. and Bryan, D. (2008) Financialization, risk and labour. Competition & Change, 12(2): 120–32.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1981) Capital: Volume III. London: Pelican Books.Google Scholar
McLeay, M., Radia, A. and Thomas, R. (2014) Money creation in the modern economy. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Q1. Available at: <http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Documents/quarterlybulletin/2014/qb14q1prereleasemoneycreation.pdf/>. Accessed 18 November 2015..+Accessed+18+November+2015.>Google Scholar
Menkhoff, L. and Tolksdorf, N. (2000) Financial Market Drift: Decoupling of the Financial Sector from the Real Economy? Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Mian, A. and Sufi, A. (2014) House of Debt: How They (and You) Caused the Great Recession, and How We Can Prevent it from Happening Again. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Noonan, L., Binham, C. and Arnold, M. (2015) UK investment banks face competition probe. The Financial Times, 19 February.Google Scholar
Norris, F. (2013) Mortgages without risk, at least for the banks. The New York Times, 28 November.Google Scholar
OECD (2011) Bank Competition and Financial Stability. Available at: <http://www.oecd.org/daf/fin/financial-markets/48501035.pdf/>. Accessed 18 November 2015..+Accessed+18+November+2015.>Google Scholar
Prasch, R. (2004) Shifting risk: The divorce of risk from reward in American capitalism. Journal of Economic Issues, 38(2): 405–12.Google Scholar
Rajan, R. (2006) Has finance made the world riskier? European Financial Management, 12(4): 499533.Google Scholar
Rajan, R. and Zingales, L. (2003) Banks and markets: The changing character of European finance. NBER Working Paper Series, 9595. Available at: <http://www.nber.org/papers/w9595.pdf/>. Accessed 18 November 2015.Google Scholar
Sinn, H-W. (2012) Casino Capitalism: How the Financial Crisis Came About and What Needs to be Done Now. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1778) The Wealth of Nations: Books I-III. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.Google Scholar
Sotiropoulos, D., Milios, J. and Lapatsioras, S. (2013) A Political Economy of Contemporary Capitalism and its Crisis: Demystifying Finance. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Strange, S. (1997) Casino Capitalism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Vasudevan, R. (2013) ‘Libor'ing under the market illusion. Monthly Review, 64(8): 112.Google Scholar
Veblen, T. (1912) The Theory of Business Enterprise. New York, NY: Charles Scribner's.Google Scholar
Wigan, D. (2010) Credit risk transfer and crunches: Global finance victorious or vanquished? New Political Economy, 15(1): 109125.Google Scholar
Wyly, E., Moos, M., Hammel, D. and Kabahizi, E. (2009) Cartographies of race and class: Mapping the class-monopoly rents of American subprime mortgage capital. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(2): 332–54.Google Scholar