Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:50:18.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recovering the mundane practices of economic time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Jacqueline Best
Jacqueline Best*
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa, Canada
*
Corresponding author: Jacqueline Best, School ofPolitical Studies, University of Ottawa, 120 University Private, Ottawa, OntarioK1N 6N5, Canada. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

How exactly did the neoliberal imaginary that Konings describes gain so much traction? Was its speculative temporality smoothly translated into practice from the writings of Hayek and others as he suggests, or was its production a messier, more contested, and more contingent affair? In this brief commentary, I go back to one of the key historical moments that he examines, the Volcker shock of 1979-82, and examine some of the more mundane political and technical struggles that defined the early Reagan Administration’s efforts to put the neoliberal speculative logic into practice. By revealing the often-flawed material efforts that go into producing speculative temporalities, I argue that such struggles might allow us to arrive at a less teleological account of the resilience of neoliberalism.

Type
Forum: Capital and time
Information
Finance and Society , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , 2018 , pp. 181 - 187
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© 2018 The Author(s)

References

Best, J. (2014) Governing Failure: Provisional Expertise and the Transformation of Global Development Finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.26530/OAPEN_472457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, J. (2019) The inflation game: Targets, practices and the social production of monetary credibility. New Political Economy, doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2018.1484714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M. (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In: Law, J. (ed.), Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 196–233.Google Scholar
Konings, M. (2015) The Emotional Logic of Capitalism: What Progressives Have Missed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konings, M. (2018) Capital and Time: For a New Critique of Neoliberal Reason. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action. Milton Keynes: Open University.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1993) The Pasteurization of France, translated by Sheridan, A. and Law, J.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. (2007) The material production of virtuality: Innovation, cultural geography and facticity in derivatives markets. Economy and Society, 36(3): 355–76.10.1080/03085140701428332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millo, Y. and MacKenzie, D. (2009) The usefulness of inaccurate models: Towards an understanding of the emergence of financial risk management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(5): 638–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quattrone, P. (2009) Books to be practiced: Memory, the power of the visual, and the success of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(1): 85–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar