Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:32:28.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leaf Analysis as a Diagnostic Method and Advisory Aid in Crop Nutrition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

C. Bould
C. Bould
Affiliation:
Long Ashton Research Station, University of Bristol
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The general principles of leaf analysis as a diagnostic method and as a guide to plant nutritional status are outlined and discussed. Factors, other than nutrient supply, that affect leaf composition are mentioned and methods of leaf sampling, preparation and storage are described. The practical application of leaf analysis to fruit, flower, vegetable, tree and miscellaneous economic crops is reviewed and suggestions are made for its use as an advisory aid.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , January 1968 , pp. 17 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Archibald, J. A. (1964). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems IV (Bould, C., Prevot, P. and Magness, J. R., eds.), p. 1. East Lansing, Michigan: Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.Google Scholar
Arkley, T. H., Munns, D. N. & Johnson, C. M. (1960). J. Agric. Fd Chem. 8, 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballenger, W. E. & Mason, D. D. (1960). Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 76, 359.Google Scholar
Baver, L. D. (ed.) (1960). Hawaiian Planters Rec. 56 (1), 1.Google Scholar
Beyers, E. (1962). S. Aft. J. agric. Sci. 5, 315.Google Scholar
Bollard, E. G., Ashwin, P. M. & McGrath, H. J. W. (1962). N.Z.J. Agric. Res. 5, 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouat, A. (1957). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems (Prevot, P., ed.), p. 311. Paris: Institut de Recherches pour les Huiles et Oléagineux.Google Scholar
Bouat, A. (1960). Fertilité 10, 13.Google Scholar
Bould, C. (1955). J. hort. Sci. 30, 188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bould, C. (1964). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 15, 474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bould, C. (1966). In Fruit Nutrition (Childers, N. F., ed.), p. 651. New Brunswick, N. Jersey: Rutgers State University.Google Scholar
Bould, C., Bradfield, E. G. & Clarke, G. M. (1960). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 11, 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bould, C., Bradfield, E. G. & Clarke, G. M. (1963). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 14, 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bould, C. & Catlow, E. (1954). J. hort. Sci. 29, 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boynton, D. & Compton, O. C. (1945). Soil Sci. 59, 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradfield, E. G. & Bould, C. (1963). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 14, 729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broeshart, H. (1955). The Application of Foliar Analysis in Oil Palm Cultivation. Univ. of Wageningen, Holland.Google Scholar
Cahoon, G. A. & Crummett, D. O. (1954). Calif. Agric. 8, 10.Google Scholar
Cain, J. C. (1953a). Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 62, 46.Google Scholar
Cain, J. C. (1953b). Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 62, 53.Google Scholar
Cain, J. C. (1959). In Mineral Nutrition of Trees Bull. 15: Duke University, U.S.A.Google Scholar
Cain, J. C. & Boynton, D. (1948). Proc. Amer. Soc. hart. Sci. 51, 13.Google Scholar
Carlson, W. H. & Bergman, E. L. (1966). Proc. Amer. Soc. bort. Sci. 88, 671.Google Scholar
Chapman, H. D. (1961). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems (Reuther, W., ed.), p. 75. Washington, D.C.: Amer. Inst. Biol. Sci. Pub. No. 8.Google Scholar
Chapman, H. D. (1964). World Crops. 16 (3), 36.Google Scholar
Chapman, H. D. (1966). In Diagnostic Criteria for Plants and Soils (Chapman, H. D., ed.), p. 570. Univ. of California.Google Scholar
Childers, N. F. (ed.) (1966). Fruit Nutrition: Temperate to Tropical. New Brunswick, N. Jersey: Horticultural Publications, Rutgers State University.Google Scholar
Clements, H. F. (1961). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems (Reuther, W., ed.), p. 131. Washington, D.C.: Amer. Inst. Biol. Sci. Pub. No. 8.Google Scholar
Cook, A. J. (1966). In Fruit Nutrition (Childers, N. F., ed.), p. 777. New Brunswick, N. Jersey: Rutgers Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Drosdoff, M. (1954). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems (Prevot, P., ed.), p. 181. Paris: Institut de Recherches pour les Huiles et Oléagineux.Google Scholar
Emmert, F. H. (1959). Proe. Amer. Soc. host. Sci. 73, 521.Google Scholar
Fiedler, W. (1964). Blattanalyse im Obstbau, No. 6. Berlin: Institut fur Landwirtschaftlickc.Google Scholar
Fullmer, F. S. & Stromberg, L. K. (1964). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems IV (Bould, C., Prevot, P. & Magness, J. R., eds.), p. 120. East Lansing, Michigan: Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.Google Scholar
Furuta, T., Perry, F. & Orr, H. P. (1963). Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 82, 526.Google Scholar
Gillier, P. & Prevot, P. (1960). Bull. Res. Council Israel 8D, 131.Google Scholar
Goodall, D. W. & Gregory, F. G. (1947). Chemical Composition of Plants as an Index of their Nutritional Status. Aberystwyth: Imp. Bur. of Hortic. and Plantation Crops. Tech. Commun. 17.Google Scholar
Gouny, P. & Huguet, C. (1964). Ann. Physiol. Vég. Paris 6, 33.Google Scholar
Gruppe, W. (1960). Erwerbsobstbau 2, 198: 218.Google Scholar
Gruppe, W. & de Haas, P. G. (1961). Kali Briefe, Fachgebeit 2: 4, 1.Google Scholar
Hammar, H. E. (1956). Plant Physiol. 31, 256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, C. W. (1955). Emp. J. Exp. Agr., 23, 11.Google Scholar
Hewitt, C. W. & Osborne, R. E. (1962). Emp. J. Exp. Agr. 30, 249.Google Scholar
Hewitt, E. J. (1957). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems (Prevot, P., ed.), p. 104. Paris: Institut de Recherches pour les Huiles et OléagineauxGoogle Scholar
Hill, H. (1952). Proc. 13th Intern. Host. Congress, London, 1, 199.Google Scholar
Howard, J. (1951). Plant Physiol. 26, 76.Google Scholar
Howlett, F. S. (1961). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems (Reuther, W., ed), p. 355. Washington, D.C.: Amer. Inst. Biol. Sci. Pub. No. 8.Google Scholar
Howlett, F. S. & Cahoon, G. A. (1964). Ohio Rep. 49 (5), 67.Google Scholar
Ingerstad, T. (1962). Medd. Skogsforskninst. Stochk. 51, No. 7.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, A. L. (1961). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems (Reuther, W., ed.), p. 28. Washington, D.C.: Amer. Inst. Biol. Sci. Pub. No. 8.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, A. L. (1964). A Guide for Collecting Foliar Samples for Nutrient Element Analysis. East Lansing: Michigan State Univ.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, A. L. & Martin, L. (1966). In Fruit Nutrition (Childers, N. F., cd.), p. 813. New Brunswick, N. Jersey: Rutgers State Univ.Google Scholar
Kidson, E. B. (1947). J. Pomol. hort. Sci. 23, 178.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, J. D., van Gundy, S. D. & Mai, W. F. (1964). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems IV (Bould, C., Prevot, P. & Magness, J. R., eds.), p. 189. East Lansing, Michigan: Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.Google Scholar
Krantz, B. A., Nelson, W. L. & Burkhart, L. F. (1948). In Diagnostic Techniques for Soils and Crops (Kitchen, H. B., ed.), p. 137. Washington, D.C.: Amer. Potash Inst.Google Scholar
Kwong, S. S. & Boynton, D. (1959). Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 73, 168.Google Scholar
Lagatu, H. & Maume, L. (1926). C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 182, 653.Google Scholar
Lamb, J. G. D., Golden, J. D. & Power, M. (1959). J. hort. Sci. 34, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leefe, J. S. & Eaves, C. A. (1959). Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 73, 52.Google Scholar
Levy, J. F. (1957). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems (Prevot, P., ed.), p. 384. Paris: Institut de Recherches pour les Huiles et Oléagineaux.Google Scholar
Letton, L. & Armson, K. A. (1955). For. Sci. 1, 210.Google Scholar
Ljones, B. (1966). Sci. Rep. Agric. Col. Norway 45, No. 12, 1.Google Scholar
Lorenz, O. A., Tyler, K. B. & Fullmer, F. S. (1964). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems IV (Bould, C., Prevot, P. & Magness, J. R., eds.), p. 226. East Lansing, Michigan: Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E. & Wittwer, S. H. (1963). Mich. Quart. Bull. 45 (4), 595.Google Scholar
Lundegärdh, H. (1951). Leaf Analysis. London: Hilger & Watts.Google Scholar
Lunt, O. R., Kofranek, A. M. & Oertli, J. J. (1964). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems IV (Bould, C., Prevot, P., & Magness, J. R., eds.), p. 398. East Lansing, Michigan: Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.Google Scholar
Macy, P. (1936). Plant Physiol. 11, 749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, D. C., MacEachern, C. R. & Bishop, R. F. (1966). Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 30, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madgwick, H. A. I. (1964). Plant & Soil 20, 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, A. C. (1955). Annu. Rep. E.M. Res. Stn. for 1954, 122Google Scholar
Mason, A. C. (1958). J. hort. Sci. 33, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. B. (1964). N.Z.J. Sci. 7, 365, 378, 388.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. L. (1960). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 15, 553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mochizuki, T. & Hanada, S. (1956). Bull. Fac. Agric. Hirosaki Univ. Japan. (2), 25.Google Scholar
Moon, F. E. & Hymas, K. (1964). J. Sci. Fd Agric. 15, 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, P. V. & Boodley, J. W. (1963). Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 83, 745.Google Scholar
Nelson, P. V. & Boodley, J. W. (1965). Proc. Amer. Soc. bort. Sci. 86, 712.Google Scholar
Nicholas, D. J. D. (1948). J. hort. Sci. 24, 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, D. J. D. (1957). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems (Prevot, P., ed.), p. 119. Paris: Institut de Recherches pour les Huiles et Oléagineaux.Google Scholar
Ollagnier, M. & Prevot, P. (1956). Oléagineux 11 (6), 395.Google Scholar
Prevot, P. & Buchmann, B. (1960). Fertilité 10, 3.Google Scholar
Prevot, P. & Ollagnier, M. (1954a). In Leaf Analysis and Fertilizer Problems (Prevot, P., ed.), p. 239. Paris: Institut de Recherches pour les Huiles et Oléagineux.Google Scholar
Prevot, P. & Ollagnier, M. (1954b). Plant Physiol. 29, 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prevot, P. & Ollagnier, M. (1961). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems (Reuther, W., ed.), p. 257. Washington, D.C.: Amer. Inst. Biol. Sci.Google Scholar
Reuther, W. & Smith, P. (1954). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems (Prevot, P., ed.), p. 166. Paris: Institut de Recherches pour les Huiles et Oléagineaux.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. R., Spiers, M. & Peterson, W. J. (1954). Influence of Environment on the Chemical Composition of Plants. S. Co-operative Series Bull. 36. U.S. Dept. Agric.Google Scholar
Roach, F. A. & Bould, C. (1963). Exp. Hort. No. 8, 62.Google Scholar
Roberts, A. N., Blaney, L. T. & Compton, O. C. (1964). Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 85, 611.Google Scholar
Sato, K., Ishihara, M. & Wakabayashi, S. (1952). Natl. Inst. Agric. Sci. Bull. 1 (E), Tokyo, 3.Google Scholar
Shaulis, N. (1956). Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 68, 576.Google Scholar
Shear, C. B., Bows, H. L., Neff, M. S., Sitton, B. G. & Kilby, W. W. (1960). Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 76, 310.Google Scholar
Shorrocks, V. M. (1964). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems IV (Bould, C., Prevot, P. & Magness, J. R., eds.), p. 306. East Lansing, Michigan: Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.Google Scholar
Simons, R. K. (1965). Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 86, 56.Google Scholar
Smith, C. B. (1956). Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 67, 10.Google Scholar
Smith, C. B. & Taylor, G. A. (1952). Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 60, 33.Google Scholar
Smith, P. F. (1962). In Annu. Rev. Pl. Physiol. 13, 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P. F. (1966). In Fruit Nutrition (Childers, N. F., ed.), p. 174. New Brunswick, N. Jersey: Rutgers State University.Google Scholar
Sprague, H. B. (ed.) (1964). Hunger Signs in Crops. N. York: David McKay Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenbjerg, F. (1954). Plant and Soil 5, 226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenbjerg, F. & Jakobsen, S. T. (1963). Soil Sci. 95, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steyn, W. J. A. (1959). J. Agric. Fd Chem. 7, 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamm, C. O. (1954). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems (Prevot, P., ed.), p. 203. Paris: Institut de Recherches pour les Huiles et Oléagineux.Google Scholar
Tamm, C. O. (1956). Medd. Skogsforsknitut. Stockh. 46, No. 3.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. A. (1956). Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 67, 5.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. (1937) Plant Physiol. 12, 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, W. (1945). Soil Sci. 59, 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, W., Mack, W. B. & Fagan, F. N. (1946). Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 47, 97.Google Scholar
Thomas, W., Mack, W. B. & Smith, C. B. (1953). Pa. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 564.Google Scholar
Titus, J. S. & Boynton, D. (1953). Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 82, 35.Google Scholar
Tukey, R. B., Langston, R. & Cline, R. A. (1962). Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 80, 73.Google Scholar
Twyford, I. T. & Coulter, J. K. (1964). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems IV (Bould, C., Prevot, P. & Magness, J. R., eds.), p. 359. East Lansing, Michigan: Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.Google Scholar
Ulrich, A. (1948). In Diagnostic Techniques for Soils and Crops, p. 157. Washington, D.C.: Amer. Potash Institute.Google Scholar
Ulrich, A. (1961). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems. (Reuther, W., ed.), p. 190. Washington, D.C.: Amer. Inst. Biol. Sci. Pub. No. 8.Google Scholar
Wallace, T. (1951). The Diagnosis of Mineral Deficiencies in Plants by Visual Symptoms. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Ward, G. M. (1963). Proc. Amer. Soc. hort. Sci. 83, 695.Google Scholar
Weehunt, R. L. & Purvis, E. R. (1954). Soil Sci. 77, 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitfield, A. B. (1963). Anna. Rep. E. Mailing Res. Sta. for 1963, 107.Google Scholar
Zurbicki, Z. J. & Shtraussberg, K. A. (1964). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems IV (Bould, C., Prevot, P. & Magness, J. R., eds.), p. 392. East Lansing, Michigan: Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.Google Scholar