Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:23:08.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does inoculation with native rhizobia enhance nitrogen fixation and yield of cowpea through legume-based intercropping in the northern mountainous areas of Vietnam?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2020

Trung Thanh Nguyen Open the ORCID record for Trung Thanh Nguyen [Opens in a new window] ,
Mary Atieno ,
Laetitia Herrmann ,
Sutkhet Nakasathien Open the ORCID record for Sutkhet Nakasathien [Opens in a new window] ,
Ed Sarobol ,
Arunee Wongkaew ,
Kien Tri Nguyen  and
Didier Lesueur Open the ORCID record for Didier Lesueur [Opens in a new window]
Trung Thanh Nguyen
Affiliation:
Department of Agrochemistry, Faculty of Land Management, Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Hanoi, Vietnam Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, Multifunctional Landscape Lever, Asia hub, Common Microbial Biotechnology Platform (CMBP), Hanoi, Vietnam
Mary Atieno
Affiliation:
Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, Multifunctional Landscape Lever, Asia hub, Common Microbial Biotechnology Platform (CMBP), Hanoi, Vietnam
Laetitia Herrmann
Affiliation:
Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, Multifunctional Landscape Lever, Asia hub, Common Microbial Biotechnology Platform (CMBP), Hanoi, Vietnam
Sutkhet Nakasathien
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
Ed Sarobol
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
Arunee Wongkaew
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
Kien Tri Nguyen
Affiliation:
Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, Multifunctional Landscape Lever, Asia hub, Common Microbial Biotechnology Platform (CMBP), Hanoi, Vietnam
Didier Lesueur*
Affiliation:
CIRAD, Performance of Tropical Production and Processing Systems Department, UMR Eco&Sols, Hanoi, Vietnam Eco&Sols, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, IRD, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, Multifunctional Landscape Lever, Asia hub, Common Microbial Biotechnology Platform (CMBP), Hanoi, Vietnam School of Life and Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the Northern mountainous region of Vietnam, cassava–cowpea intercropping system has been widely promoted with support from the local agricultural department. However, cowpea yield is often limited because of a low Biological Nitrogen Fixation (BNF) activity due to its low natural nodulation and lack of available effective Rhizobium products. The aim of this study was to identify the most effective native rhizobia isolate nodulating cowpea with the potential to increase BNF and yield of cowpea. A greenhouse experiment was initially conducted with five treatments: three native rhizobia isolates (CMBP037, CMBP054, and CMBP065); a control (no inoculation and no N application); and N+ (no inoculation, application of N as KNO3). Field inoculations were carried out and the treatments were as follows: a control (no inoculation); CMBP (037+054) – a mixture of strains from Mau Dong; CMBP065 strain from Cat Thinh. CMBP054 and CMBP065 had the highest nodulation in the greenhouse (46.4 and 60.7 nodules plant−1, respectively) and were rated as effective with symbiotic efficiency (SEF) of 54.56 and 55.73%, respectively. In the field, CMBP (037+054) recorded significantly higher nodulation (19.4 nodules plant−1) than the control (11.7 nodules plant−1). CMBP (037+054) also increased cowpea shoot dry weight, shoot N, and yield by 28.6, 4.9, and 10.5%, respectively, compared to the uninoculated control. This effect was slope dependent (statistically significant in moderate and steep slope, not with gentle slope). Besides, the high expansion rate of intercropping with cowpea showed the high adoption level of these agroecological practices by local farmers. This study reveals the potential of native rhizobia inoculation to enhance soil fertility and sustainable agriculture in the Northern mountainous region of Vietnam and proposes enhanced efforts to promote the availability and utilization of effective inoculants for cowpea.

Keywords

CowpeaRhizobiaBiological Nitrogen FixationIntercroppingAgroecology
Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 56 , Issue 6 , December 2020 , pp. 825 - 836
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agegnehu, G., Ghizaw, A. and Sinebo, W. (2008). Yield potential and land-use efficiency of wheat and faba bean mixed intercropping. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 28, 257–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ampomah, O. Y., Ofori-Ayeh, E., Solheim, B. and Svenning, M. M. (2008). Host range, symbiotic effectiveness and nodulation competitiveness of some indigenous cowpea bradyrhizobia isolates from the transitional savanna zone of Ghana. African Journal of Biotechnology 7(8), 988–996.Google Scholar
Awonaike, K., Kumarasinghe, K. and Danso, S. (1990). Nitrogen fixation and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) as influenced by cultivar and Bradyrhizobium strain. Field Crops Research 24, 163–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bala, A., Abaidoo, R. and Woomer, P. (2010). Rhizobia strain isolation and characterisation protocol. Available at www.N2Africa.org (accessed 10 December 2010).Google Scholar
Bashir, M. T., Ali, S., Ghauri, M., Adris, A. and Harun, R. (2013). Impact of excessive nitrogen fertilizers on the environment and associated mitigation strategies. Asian Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Environmental Sciences 15, 213–221.Google Scholar
Beck, D. P., Materon, L. A. and Afandi, F. (1993). Practical Rhizobium-legume technology manual. Aleppo: International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA).Google Scholar
Bedoussac, L., Journet, E., Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., Naudin, C., Corre-Hellou, G., Jensen, E. S. and Justes, E. (2017). Ensuring sustainable grain legume-cereal cropping systems. In Achieving Sustainable Cultivation of Grain Legumes, Cambridge: Burleigh Dodds Science publishing.Google Scholar
Boddey, R. M., Urquiaga, S., Neves, M. C. P. and Peres, J. (1990). Quantification of the contribution of N2 fixation to field-grown grain legumes—a strategy for the practical application of the 15N isotope dilution technique. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 22, 649–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boman, B. J., Wilson, P. C. and Ontermaa, E. A. (2002). Understanding water quality parameters for citrus irrigation and drainage systems. Univ. of Florida IFAS Extension, Circ 1406.Google Scholar
Boonkerd, N. (2002). Development of inoculant production and utilisation in Thailand. Inoculants and nitrogen fixation of legumes in Vietnam, 95–104.Google Scholar
Bremner, J. (1996). Nitrogen-total. Methods of soil analysis part 3—chemical methods, 1085–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broughton, W. and Dilworth, M. (1971). Control of leghaemoglobin synthesis in snake beans. Biochemical Journal 125, 1075–1080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Compton, J. E., Harrison, J. A., Dennis, R. L., Greaver, T. L., Hill, B. H., Jordan, S. J., Walker, H. and Campbell, H. V. (2011). Ecosystem services altered by human changes in the nitrogen cycle: a new perspective for US decision making. Ecology Letters 14, 804–815.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cong, W. F., Hoffland, E., Li, L., Six, J., Sun, J. H., Bao, X. G., Zhang, F. S. and Van Der Werf, W. (2015). Intercropping enhances soil carbon and nitrogen. Global Change Biology 21, 1715–1726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danso, S. and Owiredu, J. (1988). Competitiveness of introduced and indigenous cowpea Bradyrhizobium strains for nodule formation on cowpeas [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] in three soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 20, 305–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Date, R. (2000). Inoculated legumes in cropping systems of the tropics. Field Crops Research 65, 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Schutter, O. (2010). Agroecology and the right to food. United Nations. December.Google Scholar
Duchene, O., Vian, J.-F. and Celette, F. (2017). Intercropping with legume for agroecological cropping systems: Complementarity and facilitation processes and the importance of soil microorganisms. A review. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 240, 148–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwivedi, A., Dev, I., Kumar, V., Yadav, R. S., Yadav, M., Gupta, D., Singh, A. and Tomar, S. (2015). Potential role of maize-legume intercropping systems to improve soil fertility status under smallholder farming systems for sustainable agriculture in India. International Journal of Life Sciences Biotechnology and Pharma Research 4, 145.Google Scholar
Fening, J. and Danso, S. (2002). Variation in symbiotic effectiveness of cowpea bradyrhizobia indigenous to Ghanaian soils. Applied Soil Ecology 21, 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
General Statistics Office of Vietnam. (2019). Result of rural, agricultural and fishery census 2018. The situation of agricultural, forestry and fishery production. Hanoi: Statistical Publishing House.Google Scholar
Gibson, A. (1987). Evaluation of nitrogen fixation by legumes in the greenhouse and growth chamber.Google Scholar
Gómez Padilla, E., Ruiz-Díez, B., Fernández-Pascual, M., López Sánchez, R., Bloem, E. and Eichler-Löbermann, B. (2016). Inoculation with native Bradyrhizobia strains improved growth of cowpea plants cultivated on a saline soil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 47, 2218–2224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haiyan, C., Xiang, X., Jian, Y., Adams, J. M., Zhang, K., Yuntao, L. and Yu, S. (2016). Effects of slope aspects on soil bacterial and arbuscular fungal communities in a boreal forest in China. Pedosphere 26, 226–234.Google Scholar
Herridge, D. (2002). Legume N and inoculants: Global and Vietnamese perspectives. Inoculants and nitrogen fixation of legumes in Vietnam, 7–9.Google Scholar
Herridge, D. F., Peoples, M. B. and Boddey, R. M. (2008). Global inputs of biological nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Plant and Soil 311, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howeler, R. H. (1991). Long-term effect of cassava cultivation on soil productivity. Field Crops Research 26, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howeler, R. H. and Hershey, C. H. (2002). Cassava in Asia: Research and development to increase its potential use in food, feed and industry: a Thai example.Google Scholar
Jahn, R., Blume, H., Asio, V., Spaargaren, O. and Schad, P. (2006). Guidelines for soil description. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Kawaka, F., Dida, M. M., Opala, P. A., Ombori, O., Maingi, J., Osoro, N., Muthini, M., Amoding, A., Mukaminega, D. and Muoma, J. (2014). Symbiotic efficiency of native rhizobia nodulating common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in soils of Western Kenya. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2014.Google Scholar
Knörzer, H., Graeff-Hönninger, S., Guo, B., Wang, P. and Claupein, W. (2009). The rediscovery of intercropping in China: a traditional cropping system for future Chinese agriculture–a review. In Climate change, intercropping, pest control and beneficial microorganisms, 13–44l: Springer.Google Scholar
Korir, H., Mungai, N. W., Thuita, M., Hamba, Y. and Masso, C. (2017). Co-inoculation effect of rhizobia and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on common bean growth in a low phosphorus soil. Frontiers in Plant Science 8, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskey, G., Mburu, S. W., Njeru, E. M., Kimiti, J. M., Ombori, O. and Maingi, J. M. (2017). Potential of native rhizobia in enhancing nitrogen fixation and yields of climbing beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in contrasting environments of Eastern Kenya. Frontiers in Plant Science 8, 443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lalande, R., Bigwaneza, P. and Antoun, H. (1990). Symbiotic effectiveness of strains of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar phaseoli isolated from soils of Rwanda. Plant and Soil 121, 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandimba, G. (1995). Contribution of nodulated legumes of the growth of Zea mays L. under various cropping systems. Symbiosis 19, 213–222.Google Scholar
Martinez-Romero, E. (2003). Diversity of Rhizobium-Phaseolus vulgaris symbiosis: overview and perspectives. Plant and Soil 252, 11–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathu, S., Herrmann, L., Pypers, P., Matiru, V., Mwirichia, R. and Lesueur, D. (2012). Potential of indigenous bradyrhizobia versus commercial inoculants to improve cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. walp.) and green gram (Vigna radiata L. wilczek.) yields in Kenya. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 58, 750–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meghvansi, M., Prasad, K. and Mahna, S. (2010). Symbiotic potential, competitiveness and compatibility of indigenous Bradyrhizobium japonicum isolates to three soybean genotypes of two distinct agro-climatic regions of Rajasthan, India. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 17, 303–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ngeno, J. K. (2018). Abundance, genetic diversity and symbiotic efficiency of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) rhizobia in soils of South Western Kenya. Doctoral of Philosophy, University of Nairobi.Google Scholar
Nkot, L. N., Fankem, H., Adamou, S., Ngakou, A., Nwaga, D. and Etoa, F.-X. (2015). Abundance of legume nodulating bacteria in soils of diverse land use systems in Cameroon. Universal Journal of Plant Science 3, 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyfeler, D., Huguenin-Elie, O., Suter, M., Frossard, E., Connolly, J. and Lüscher, A. (2009). Strong mixture effects among four species in fertilized agricultural grassland led to persistent and consistent transgressive overyielding. Journal of Applied Ecology 46, 683–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyoki, D. and Ndakidemi, P. (2013). Economic benefits of Bradyrhizobium japonicum inoculation and phosphorus supplementation in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp) grown in northern Tanzania. American Journal of Research Communication 1, 173–189.Google Scholar
Nyoki, D. and Ndakidemi, P. A. (2016). Intercropping system, rhizobia inoculation, phosphorus and potassium fertilization: A strategy of soil replenishment for improved crop yield. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 5, 504–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojo, A., Dare, M. O., Fagbola, O. and Babalola, O. (2015). Variations in infectivity of indigenous rhizobial isolates of some soils in the rainforest zone of Nigeria. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 61, 371–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orwin, K. H., Wardle, D. A. and Greenfield, L. G. (2006). Ecological consequences of carbon substrate identity and diversity in a laboratory study. Ecology 87, 580–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raposeiras, R., Marriel, I. E., Muzzi, M. R. S., Paiva, E., Pereira Filho, I. A., Carvalhais, L. C., Passos, R. V. M., Pinto, P. P. and Sá, N. M. H. d. (2006). Rhizobium strains competitiveness on bean nodulation in Cerrado soils. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 41, 439–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svenning, M., Gudmundsson, J., Fagerli, I.-L. and Leinonen, P. (2001). Competition for nodule occupancy between introduced strains of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar trifolii and its influence on plant production. Annals of Botany 88, 781–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tittonell, P. (2014). Food security and ecosystem services in a changing world: it is time for agroecology.Google Scholar
Toomsan, B., McDonagh, J., Limpinuntana, V. and Giller, K. (1995). Nitrogen fixation by groundnut and soyabean and residual nitrogen benefits to rice in farmers’ fields in Northeast Thailand. Plant and Soil 175, 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trung, N. T., Nakasathien, S. and Vichukit, V. (2013). Enhancing sustainable cassava production in hilly areas of Van Yen, Yen Bai province, Vietnam. Kasertsart Journal (National Science) 47, 492–505.Google Scholar
Ulzen, J., Abaidoo, R. C., Mensah, N. E., Masso, C. and AbdelGadir, A. H. (2016). Bradyrhizobium inoculants enhance grain yields of soybean and cowpea in Northern Ghana. Frontiers in Plant Science 7, 1770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanlauwe, B. and Giller, K. E. (2006). Popular myths around soil fertility management in sub-Saharan Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 116, 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veena, K. and Poonam, S. (2011). Potential for enhancing lentil (Lens culinaris) productivity by co-inoculation with PSB, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and Rhizobium . Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81, 932–934.Google Scholar
Watanabe, I., Hakoyama, S., Terao, T. and Singh, B. (1997). Evaluation methods for drought tolerance of cowpea. Advances in cowpea research, 87–98.Google Scholar
Weerarathne, L., Marambe, B. and Chauhan, B. S. (2017). Does intercropping play a role in alleviating weeds in cassava as a non-chemical tool of weed management?–A review. Crop Protection 95, 81–88.Google Scholar
Yohane, E. N. (2016). Assessment of the abundance and effectiveness of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp] rhizobia in soils from different fields in Chiwosya extension planning area, Mchinji district. Master, University of Malawi Bunda.Google Scholar
Yoseph, T., Baraso, B. and Ayalew, T. (2017). Influence of Bradyrhizobia inoculation on growth, nodulation and yield performance of cowpea varieties. African Journal of Agricultural Research 12, 1906–1913.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Nguyen et al. supplementary material

Figure S2

Download Nguyen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 336.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Nguyen et al. supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Nguyen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 45.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Nguyen et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Nguyen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 21.5 KB