Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:46:05.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TRANSFORMING THE PALMER DROUGHT SEVERITY INDEX INTO A STANDARDIZED MULTI-SCALAR INDEX: ASSESSING THE NORMALITY ASSUMPTION UNDER SOUTH AMERICA TROPICAL-SUBTROPICAL CONDITIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2018

GABRIEL CONSTANTINO BLAIN Open the ORCID record for GABRIEL CONSTANTINO BLAIN [Opens in a new window]  and
ANA CAROLINA FREITAS XAVIER
GABRIEL CONSTANTINO BLAIN*
Affiliation:
Centro de Ecofisiologia e Biofísica, Instituto Agronômico (IAC), P.O. Box 28, 13012-970 Campinas, SP, Brazil
ANA CAROLINA FREITAS XAVIER
Affiliation:
Post-Graduation Program, Instituto Agronômico (IAC), P.O. Box 28, 13012-970 Campinas, SP, Brazil
*
‡Corresponding author: Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two of the most common criticisms over the widely used Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) is that it cannot be calculated at different time scales and it is not as spatially comparable as other Standardized Drought Indices (SDI), such as the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI). Therefore, the hypothesis that the PDSI may be transformed into a multi-scalar index sharing the same normalized nature of others SDI has been proposed in the scientific literature. This hypothesis was extensively evaluated in this study by statistical methods largely used to assess and improve the performance of others standardized drought indices (e.g. SPI). In general terms, these methods evaluated the ability of the transformed/probability-based Palmer's Index to approach the standard normal distribution. The strategy of basing the selection of a distribution for calculating such an index on its performance within the range of typical drought and flood events was adopted. The testing region was the State of São Paulo, a tropical-subtropical region of Brazil. Time scales ranging from 1- to 12-month and Available Water Capacity equal to 50, 100 and 150 mm were also considered. A computational algorithm for calculating the new version of the Palmer's index is also provided. The Generalized Logistic distribution with parameters estimated by the maximum likelihood method is recommended to calculate the new index. The results of the normality tests are consistent with the above-mentioned strategy. From a scientific standpoint, the results support the hypothesis of this study. Therefore, we conclude that the new Standardized Palmer Drought Index (SPDI) is capable of meeting the normally assumption under tropical-subtropical climatic conditions of Brazil. In other words, the new SPDI has shown to be capable of representing floods and drought events in a similar probabilistic/normalized way. This conclusion holds true for time scales ranging from 1- to 12-month and Available Water Capacity equal to 50, 100 and 150 mm.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 55 , Issue 5 , October 2019 , pp. 752 - 764
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I. A. (1965). Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Alley, W. M. (1984). The palmer drought severity index: Limitations and assumptions. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 23:1100–9.Google Scholar
Anderson, T. W. and Darling, D. A. (1954). A test of goodness of fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association 49:765–69.Google Scholar
Beguería, S., Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Reig, F. and Latorre, B. (2014). Standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) revisited: Parameter fitting, evapotranspiration models, tools, datasets and drought monitoring. International Journal of Climatology 34:3001–23. doi:10.1002/joc.3887.Google Scholar
Blain, G. C. (2012). Revisiting the probabilistic definition of drought: Strengths, limitations and an agrometeorological adaptation. Bragantia 71:132–41. doi:10.1590/S0006-87052012000100019.Google Scholar
Blain, G. C., De Avila, A. M. H. and Pereira, V. R. (2018). Using the normality assumption to calculate probability-based standardized drought indices: Selection criteria with emphases on typical events. International Journal of Climatology. doi: 10.1002/joc.5381Google Scholar
Camargo, A. P. De and Camargo, M. B. P. De (2000). Uma revisão analítica da evapotranspiração potencial. Bragantia 59:125–37. doi:10.1590/S0006-87052000000200002.Google Scholar
Delignette-Muller, M. L. and Dutang, C. (2015). Fitdistrplus: An R package for fitting distributions. Journal of Statistical Software 64:1–34. doi:10.18637/jss.v064.i04.Google Scholar
Genest, C. and Favre, A. (2007). Everything you always wanted to know about copula modeling but were afraid to ask. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 12:347–68. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699Google Scholar
Guttman, N. B. (1998). Comparing the palmer drought index and the standardized precipitation index. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34:113–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05964.x/pdf.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Hughes, B. and Saunders, M. A. (2002). A drought climatology for Europe. International Journal of Climatology 22:1571–92. doi:10.1002/joc.846.Google Scholar
Ma, M., Ren, L., Singh, V. P., Tu, X., Jiang, S. and Liu, Y. (2015). Evaluation and application of the SPDI-JDI for droughts in Texas, USA. Journal of Hydrology 521:34–45.Google Scholar
Ma, M., Ren, L., Yuan, F., Jiang, S., Liu, Y., Kong, H. and Gong, L. (2014). A new standardized Palmer drought index for hydro-meteorological use. Hydrological Processes, 28:5645–61. doi: 10.1002/hyp.10063Google Scholar
Mckee, T. B., Doesken, N. J. and Kleist, J. (1993). The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, 179–84. Anaheim, Boston: American Meteorological Society.Google Scholar
Palmer, W. C. (1965). Meteorological Drought. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce Research Paper No. 45.Google Scholar
Raia, A. and Cavalcanti, I. F. A. (2008). The life cycle of the South American monsoon system. Journal of Climate 21:6227–46. doi:10.1175/2008JCLI2249.1.Google Scholar
Stagge, J. H., Tallaksen, L. M., Gudmundsson, L., Van Loon, A. F. and Stahl, K. (2015). Candidate distributions for climatological drought indices (SPI and SPEI). International Journal of Climatology 35:4027–40. doi:10.1002/joc.4267.Google Scholar
Stagge, J. H., Tallaksen, L. M., Gudmundsson, L., Van Loon, A. F. and Stahl, K. (2016). Response to comment on ‘candidate distributions for climatological drought indices (SPI and SPEI)’. International Journal of Climatology 36:2132–38. doi:10.1002/joc.4564.Google Scholar
Trenberth, K. E., Dai, A., Van Der Schrier, G., Jones, P. D., Barichivich, J., Briffa, K. R. and Sheffield, J. (2014). Global warming and changes in drought. Nature Climate Change 4:17.Google Scholar
Vera, C., Higgins, W., Amador, J., Ambrizzi, T., Garreaud, R., Gochis, D. and Gutzler, D. (2006). Toward a unified view of the American monsoon systems. Journal of Climate 19:4977–5000. doi:10.1175/JCLI3896.1.Google Scholar
Vicente-Serrano, S. M. and Beguería, S. (2016). Comment on ‘candidate distributions for climatological drought indices (SPI and SPEI)’ by James H. Stagge et al. International Journal of Climatology 36:2120–31. doi:10.1002/joc.4474.Google Scholar
Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Beguería, S. and López-Moreno, J. I. (2010a). A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: The standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. Journal of Climate 23:1696–718. doi:10.1175/2009JCLI2909.1.Google Scholar
Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Beguería, S., López-Moreno, J. I., Angulo, M. and El Kenawy, A. (2010b). A new global 0.5 gridded dataset (1901–2006) of a multiscalar drought index: Comparison with current drought index datasets based on the palmer drought severity index. Journal of Hydrometeorology 11:1033–43.Google Scholar
Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Van der Schrier, G., Beguería, S., Azorin-Molina, C. and Lopez-Moreno, J. I. (2015). Contribution of precipitation and reference evapotranspiration to drought indices under different climates. Journal of Hydrology 526:42–54.Google Scholar
Wang, H., Pan, Y. and Yaning Chen, Y. (2017). Comparison of three drought indices and their evolutionary characteristics in the arid region of northwestern China. Atmospheric Science Letters 18:132–9. doi:10.1002/asl.735.Google Scholar
Webb, R. W., Rosenzweig, C. E. and Levine, E. R. (2000). Global soil texture and derived water-holding capacities. Available from http://www.daac.ornl.gov, doi: https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/548Google Scholar
Wells, N., Goddard, S. and Hayes, M. J. (2004). A self-calibrating palmer drought severity index. Journal of Climate 17:2335–51. doi:10.1175/1520-042(2004)017<2335:ASPDSI>2.0.CO;2.2.0.CO;2.>Google Scholar
World Meteorological Organization. (2012). Standardized Precipitation Index User Guide (Svoboda, M., Hayes, M., and Wood, D.). WMO-N. 1090, Geneva.Google Scholar
Wu, H., Svoboda, M. D., Hayes, M. J., Wilhite, D. A. and Wen, F. (2007). “Appropriate application of the standardized precipitation index in arid locations and dry seasons. International Journal of Climatology 27:65–79. doi:10.1002/joc.1371.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Blain and Xavier supplementary material

Blain and Xavier supplementary material 1

Download Blain and Xavier supplementary material(File)
File 17.4 KB