Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:25:01.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigating Source-Sink Relations in Cassava by Reciprocal Grafts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

M. T. Dahniya
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), PMB 5320, Ibadan
C. O. Oputa
Affiliation:
University of Ibadan, Nigeria
S. K. Hahn
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), PMB 5320, Ibadan

Summary

The relation between source potentials and sink capacities of four cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) varieties with different characteristics was investigated by means of reciprocal grafts. There were marked differences in the sink capacities (average stock effects) and source potentials (average scion effects) of the varieties.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

De Bruijn, G. H. & Dharmaputra, T. S. (1974). The Mukibat system, a high-yielding method of cassava production in Indonesia. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 22: 89100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, S. K. (1977). A quantitative approach to source potentials and sink capacities among reciprocal grafts of seed potato varieties. Crop Science 17: 559562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neales, T. P. & Incoll, L. D. (1968). The control of leaf photosynthesis rate by the level of assimilate concentration in the leaf. Botanical Review 34: 107125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, C. N. & Evans, A. F. (1964). Influence of tops and roots on net assimilation rate of sugar beet and spinach beet and grafts between them. Annals of Botany 29: 499508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. N. (1974). Growth and productivity of tapioca (Manihot utilissima). IV. Experimental Agriculture 10: 916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar