Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T18:01:49.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Grain legume inclusion in cereal–cereal rotation increased base crop productivity in the long run

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2019

Probir Kumar Ghosh ,
Kali Krishna Hazra Open the ORCID record for Kali Krishna Hazra [Opens in a new window] ,
Madasur Subbabhat Venkatesh ,
Chandra Sekhar Praharaj ,
Narendra Kumar ,
Chaitanya Prasad Nath ,
Ummed Singh  and
Sati Shankar Singh
Probir Kumar Ghosh*
Affiliation:
National Agricultural Higher Education Project (NAHEP), Krishi Anusandhan Bhawan - II, Pusa 110012, New Delhi, India
Kali Krishna Hazra*
Affiliation:
Crop Production Division, ICAR–Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur 208024, Uttar Pradesh, India
Madasur Subbabhat Venkatesh
Affiliation:
Regional Centre ICAR–Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Krishinagar, Dharwad 580005, Karnataka, India
Chandra Sekhar Praharaj
Affiliation:
Crop Production Division, ICAR–Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur 208024, Uttar Pradesh, India
Narendra Kumar
Affiliation:
Crop Production Division, ICAR–Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur 208024, Uttar Pradesh, India
Chaitanya Prasad Nath
Affiliation:
Crop Production Division, ICAR–Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur 208024, Uttar Pradesh, India
Ummed Singh
Affiliation:
Crop Production Division, ICAR–Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur 208024, Uttar Pradesh, India
Sati Shankar Singh
Affiliation:
ICAR–Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute, Bhumi Vihar Complex, Sector-III, Block-GB, Salt Lake, Kolkata 700097, West Bengal, India
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sustainability of cereal-based cropping systems remains crucial for food security in South Asia. However, productivity of cereal–cereal rotations has declined in the long run, demonstrating the need for a sustainable alternative. Base crop, that is, common crop in different crop rotations, productivity could be used as a sustainability indicator for the assessment of different long-term crop rotations. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of grain legume inclusion in lowland rice–wheat (R-W) and upland maize–wheat (M-W) rotation on system’s base crop (rice in lowland and wheat in upland crop rotations) productivity and sustainability and also in soil fertility. Mung bean (April–May) inclusion in R-W rotation increased rice grain yield by 10–14%. In upland, mung bean inclusion in M-W rotation increased wheat grain yield by 5–11%. Replacing wheat with chickpea in R-W rotation increased rice grain yield by 5–8%. Increased base crop productivity in legume inclusive rotations was attributed to significant improvement in panicle (rice) or spike (wheat) attributes. Increased soil organic carbon and available nitrogen and phosphorus in the legume inclusive rotations significantly influenced the base crop productivity in both the production systems. Among the crop rotations, R-W-Mb (in lowland) and M-W-Mb (in upland) rotations had the highest system productivity and net return. Therefore, intensification/diversification of cereal–cereal rotations with grain legume could improve soil fertility and sustain crop productivity.

Keywords

Cereal–cereal rotationCrop diversificationGrain legumeGrain yieldSoil fertilitySoil organic carbon
Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 142 - 158
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Probir Kumar Ghosh and Kali Krishna Hazra contributed equally

References

Ambast, S.K., Tyagi, N.K. and Raul, S.K. (2006). Management of declining groundwater in the Trans Indo–Gangetic Plain (India): Some options. Agricultural Water Management 82, 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharyya, R., Kundu, S., Pandey, S.C. Singh, K.P. and Gupta, H.S. (2008). Tillage and irrigation effects on crop yields and soil properties under the rice–wheat system in the Indian Himalayas. Agricultural Water Management 95, 993–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calegari, A., Hargrove, W.L., Rheinheimer, D.D.S., Ralisch, R., Tessier, D., de Tourdonnet, S. and de Fatima Guimarães, M. (2008). Impact of long–term no–tillage and cropping system management on soil organic carbon in an Oxisol: A model for sustainability. Agronomy Journal 100, 1013–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, P.K., Hazra, K.K., Venkatesh, M.S., Nath, C.P., Singh, J. and Nadarajan, N. (2019). Increasing soil organic carbon through crop diversification in cereal–cereal rotations of Indo–Gangetic plain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences 89, 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, P.K., Venkatesh, M.S., Hazra, K.K. and Kumar, N. (2012). Long–term effect of pulses and nutrient management on soil organic carbon dynamics and sustainability on an inceptisol of Indo–Gangetic Plains of India. Experimental Agriculture 48, 473–487.Google Scholar
Guilpart, N., Grassini, P., Sadras, V.O., Timsina, J. and Cassman, K.G. (2017). Estimating yield gaps at the cropping system level. Field Crops Research 206, 21–32.Google ScholarPubMed
Gupta, R. and Seth, A. (2007). A review of resource conserving technologies for sustainable management of the rice–wheat cropping systems of the Indo–Gangetic plains (IGP). Crop Protection 26, 436–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazra, K.K., Singh, S.S., Nath, C.P., Borase, D.N., Kumar, N., Parihar, A.K. and Swain, D.K. (2018). Adaptation mechanisms of winter pulses through rhizospheric modification in mild–alkaline soil. National Academy Science Letters 41, 193–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazra, K.K., Venkatesh, M.S., Ghosh, P.K., Ganeshamurthy, A.N., Kumar, N., Nadarajan, N. and Singh, A.B. (2014). Long–term effect of pulse crops inclusion on soil–plant nutrient dynamics in puddled rice (Oryza sativa L.)–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cropping system on an Inceptisol of Indo–Gangetic plain zone of India. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystem 100, 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, J.J., Campbell, C.A. and Desjardins, R.L. (2007). Some perspectives on carbon sequestration in agriculture. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 142, 288–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall – of India (Pvt.) Ltd.Google Scholar
Jat, M.L., Gathala, M.K., Saharawat, Y.S., Tetarwal, J.P. and Gupta, R. (2013). Double no–till and permanent raised beds in maize–wheat rotation of north–western Indo–Gangetic plains of India: Effects on crop yields, water productivity, profitability and soil physical properties. Field Crops Research 149, 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, N., Hazra, K.K., Nath, C.P., Praharaj, C.S. and Singh, U. (2018). Grain legumes for resource conservation and agricultural sustainability in south Asia. In Meena R., Das A., Yadav G. and Lal R. (eds) Legumes for Soil Health and Sustainable Management. Singapore: Springer, pp. 77–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauren, J.G., Shrestha, R., Sattar, M.A. and Yadav, R.L. (2001). Legumes and diversification of the rice–wheat cropping system. Journal of Crop Production 3, 67–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, W.L. and Norvell, W.A. (1978). Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42, 421–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandan, R., Singh, S.S., Kumar, V., Singh, V., Hazra, K.K., Nath, C.P., Malik, R.K., Poonia, S.P. and Solanki, C.H. (2018). Crop establishment with conservation tillage and crop residue retention in rice–based cropping systems of Eastern India: Yield advantage and economic benefit. Paddy and Water Environment 16, 477–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandwa, S.M., Bationo, A., Obanyi, S.N., Rao, I.M., Sanginga, N. and Vanlauwe, B. (2011). Inter and intra–specific variation of legumes and mechanisms to access and adapt to less available soil phosphorus and rock phosphate. In Bationo A., Waswa B., Okeyo J., Maina F., Kihara J. and Mokwunye U. (eds) Fighting Poverty in Sub–Saharan Africa: The Multiple Roles of Legumes in Integrated Soil Fertility Management. Netherlands: Springer, pp. 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nayak, A.K., Gangwar, B., Shukla, A.K., Mazumdar, S.P., Kumar, A., Raja, R., Kumar, A., Kumar, V., Rai, P.K. and Mohan, U. (2012). Long–term effect of different integrated nutrient management on soil organic carbon and its fractions and sustainability of rice–wheat system in Indo Gangetic Plains of India. Field Crops Research 127, 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortiz–Monasterio, R.J.I., Dhillon, S.S. and Fischer, R.A. (1994). Date of sowing effects on grain yield and yield components of irrigated spring wheat cultivars and relationships with radiation and temperature in Ludhiana, India. Field Crops Research 37, 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peoples, M.B. and Craswell, E.T. (1992). Biological nitrogen fixation: Investments, expectations and actual contributions to agriculture. Plant and Soil 141, 13–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramesh, K. and Chandrasekaran, B. (2004). Soil organic carbon build-up and dynamics in rice–rice cropping systems. Journal of Agronomy Crop Science 190, 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S.N. and Prasad, R. (1999). Effects of sesbania green manuring and mungbean residue incorporation of productivity and nitrogen uptake of a rice–wheat cropping system. Bioresource Technology 67, 171–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuti, M.D., Prakash, V., Pandey, B.M., Bhattacharyya, R., Mahanta, D., Bisht, J.K., Kumar, M., Mina, B.L., Kumar, N., Bhatt, J.C. and Srivastva, A.K. (2012). Energy budgeting of colocasia–based cropping systems in the Indian sub–Himalayas. Energy 45, 986–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkatesh, M.S., Hazra, K.K., Ghosh, P.K., Khuswah, B.L., Ganeshamurthy, A.N., Ali, M., Singh, J. and Mathur, R.S. (2017). Long–term effect of crop rotation and nutrient management on soil–plant nutrient cycling and nutrient budgeting in Indo–Gangetic plains of India. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 63, 2007–2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkatesh, M.S., Hazra, K.K., Ghosh, P.K. and Mishra, J.P. (2019a). Integrated phosphorus management in maize–chickpea rotation in moderately–alkaline Inceptisol in Kanpur, India: An agronomic and economic evaluation. Field Crops Research 233, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkatesh, M.S., Hazra, K.K., Ghosh, P.K., Praharaj, C.S. and Kumar, N. (2013). Long–term effect of pulses and nutrient management on soil carbon sequestration in Indo–Gangetic plains of India. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 93, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkatesh, M.S., Hazra, K.K., Ghosh, P.K. and Singh, M. (2019b). Integrated phosphorus management in maize–chickpea cropping system on alkaline Fluvisol. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 113, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkley, A. and Black, I.A. (1934). An examination of the Digestion method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Ghosh et al. supplementary material

Figures S1 and S2

Download Ghosh et al. supplementary material(File)
File 248.5 KB