Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:47:20.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A political sociology of the Nordic countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

Erik Allardt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Nordic countries of Europe have many common traits. They are small countries in Northern Europe, they have been Lutheran since the Reformation, and they had, for centuries, a strong landholding peasantry but a weak aristocracy. They developed a comprehensive welfare state after the Second World War, and they are more sceptical about European integration than people from other countries in Western Europe. Despite attempts to create a Nordic union and the existence of a Nordic Council, their joint Nordic orientation has been subordinated to the national interests of the individual Nordic countries. They are clear-cut nation states with a nationalism that is not fierce, but represents a kind of official, controlled and uniform national spirit. With respect to parliamentary politics and social policy the main features of the countries have been called the Nordic Model. The model still exists, but rests on shakier ground than before.

Type
Focus: The Imagination and the Sea
Information
European Review , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , February 2000 , pp. 129 - 141
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Alestalo, M. and Kuhnle, S. (1987) The Scandinavian route: economic, social and political developments in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. In Erikson, R. et al. (eds) The Scandinavian Model: Welfare States and Welfare Research (London: Sharpe) pp. 3–38.Google Scholar
2.Allardt, E. (1995) The Europe of Scandinavia and Scandinavians. In Chehabi, H.E. and Stepan, A. (eds) Politics, Society and Democracy. Essays in Honour of Juan J. Linz, (Boulder: Westview) pp. 131–140.Google Scholar
3.Galtung, J. (1974) Norway in the World Community. In Ramsöy, N. Rogoff (ed) Norwegian Society (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget) pp. 385–428.Google Scholar
4.Hettne, B., Sörlin, S., and Ostergård, U., (1998) Den globala nationalismen Nationalstatens historia och framtid (The global nationalism. The history and future of the nation-state) (Stockholm: SNS).Google Scholar
5.Jenssen, A.T., Gilljam, M., and Pesonen, P. (1998) The Citizens, the Referendums and The European Union. In Jenssen, A.T., Pesonen, P. and Gilljam, M. (eds) To Join or Not to Join. Three Nordic Referendums on Membership in the European Union (Oslo: Scandinavian University Press) pp. 37–60.Google Scholar
6.Holmberg, S. (1998) The extent of European integration. In Jenssen, A.T., Pesonen, P. and Gilljam, M. (eds), To Join or Not to Join. Three Nordic Referendums on Membership in the European Union (Oslo: Scandinavian University Press) pp. 269–283.Google Scholar
7.Hobsbawm, E. J. and Ranger, T. (eds) (1983) The Invention of Tradition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
8.Österud, Ö. (1996) Constructions of political order and collective identities in early modern northern Europe.Paper at the conference Collective Identity, Public Sphere and Political Order,Uppsala, Sweden,11–14 June, 1996.Google Scholar
9.Allardt, E. (1993) The nation-state and nationalism with different forms of technology. In Iivonen, J. (ed) The Future of the Nation State in Europe (Aldershot: Edward Elgar) pp. 87–106.Google Scholar
10.Alestalo, M. (1986) Structural Change Classes and the State. Finland in an Historical and Comparative Perspective (Helsinki: Research Group for Comparative Sociology).Google Scholar
11.Paakkolanvaara, E. (1988) Informaatioyhteiskunta ja informaatioammatit. Information Society and Information Occupations (Helsinki: Central Statistical Office of Finland).Google Scholar
12.Wallerstein, I. (1980) The Modern World System II. Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy. 1600–1750 (New York: Academic Press).Google Scholar
13.Therborn, G. (1988) Hur det hela började. När och varför det moderna Sverige blev vad det blev (As it all began. When and Why modern Sweden came off as it did). In Himmeistrand, U. and Svensson, G. (eds) Sverige–vardag och struktur (Stockholm: Norstedts) pp. 23–54.Google Scholar
14.Porat, M.U. (1977) The Information Economy: Definition and Measurement (Departement of Commerce, Office of Telecommunications).Google Scholar
15.Alestalo, M. (1989) Den offentliga sektorns tillväxt förr och nu (The growth of the public sector previously and presently). In Norden. Förr och nu, commemorating the 100th anniversary of the cooperation of the Nordic Census Bureaus (Stockholm: Nordic Statistical Secretariat) pp. 127–140.Google Scholar
16.Marklund, S. and Nordlund, A. (1999) Economic problems, welfare convergence and political instability. In Heikkilä, M., Hvinden, B.. Kautto, M., Marklund, S. and Ploug, N. (eds) Nordic Social Policy. Welfare State Adjustment in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden from the 1980s to the mid-1990s (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul) pp. 19–53.Google Scholar
17.Österud, Ö. (1978) Agrarian Structure and Peasant Politics in Scandinavia. A Comparative Study of Rural Response to Economic Change (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget).Google Scholar
18.Castles, F. G. (1978) The Social Democratic Image of Society. A Study of the Achievements and Origins of the Scandinavian Social Democracy in a Comparative Perspective (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
19.Uusitalo, H. (1975) Class Structure and Party Choice. A Scandinavian Comparison (Helsinki: Research Group for Comparative Sociology).Google Scholar
20.Allardt, E. (1987) Finland as a Nordic Society. In Engman, M. and Kirby, D. (eds), Finland. People. Nation. State (London: Hurst) pp. 212–226.Google Scholar
21.Stephens, J. (1979) The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism (London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Lane, J-E., Martikainen, T.. Svensson, P., Vogt, G. and Valen, H. (1993) Scandinavian exceptionalism reconsidered. Journal of Theoretical Politics 5, 195–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Allardt, E. (1984) Representative government in a bureaucratic age. Daedalus 113, 169–198.Google Scholar
24.Esping-Andersen, G. and Korpi, W. (1987) From poor relief to institutional welfare states. The development of Scandinavian social policy. In Erikson, R. et al. (eds), The Scandinavian Model: Welfare States and Welfare Research (London: Sharpe) pp. 39–74.Google Scholar
25.Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three World of Welfare Capitalism (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
26.Andersen, J. G., Pettersen, P.A., Svallfors, S. and Uusitalo, H. (1999) The legitimacy of the Nordic welfare state. In Heikkilä, M., Hvinden, B.. Kautto, M., Marklund, S. and Ploug, N. (eds) Nordic Social Policy. Welfare State Adjustment in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden from the 1980s to the mid-1990s (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul) pp. 235–261.Google Scholar
27.Heikkila, M., Hvinden, B., Kautto, N., Marklund, S. and Ploug, N. (1999) Conclusion. The Nordic Model stands stable but on shaky ground. In Heikkilä, M., Hvinden, B.. Kautto, M., Marklund, S. and Ploug, N. (eds) Nordic Social Policy. Welfare State Adjustment in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden from the 1980s to the mid-1990s (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul) pp. 262–272.Google Scholar