Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:22:19.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moderate Secularism in Europe in the Face of Integration Challenges: The Debate about Legal Pluralism and Multiculturalism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2020

Rosa María Martínez de Codes
Rosa María Martínez de Codes*
Affiliation:
Universidad Complutense of Madrid, Madrid, Spain. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Public authorities in Europe are faced with increasing demands to accommodate religious diversity. This article traces some key issues concerning the limits of the secular State in Europe to accept and accommodate those ethno-religious minorities that are perceived to be partially different entities and claim some jurisdiction, without thereby rejecting guarantees from the receiving legal system. This multicultural challenge that minorities pose to institutionalized secularism is amongst the most complex political and long-term issues European states have to face. Such a challenge has not only to do with socio-economic disadvantage and discrimination in the labour markets but also with the constitutional status or corporate relationship with the State. On the other hand, European anxieties question whether or not Muslims can be and are willing to be integrated into European society and its political values; in particular, values of freedom, tolerance, democracy, sexual equality and secularism. Across Europe, multiculturalism seems to be in retreat and ‘integration’ is once again the watchword.

Type
Focus: How can History and Archaeology be Handmaidens in Defining a National or Regional (in this Case European) Identity?
Information
European Review , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , June 2020 , pp. 459 - 464
Copyright
© 2020 Academia Europaea

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Guest Editor: Nikita Harwich

References

Bano, S (ed.) (2017) Gender and Justice in Family Law Disputes. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, G and Taylor, C (2008) Building the Future: A Time for Reconciliation. Commission de consultation sur les pratiques d’accommodement reliées aux différences culturelles. Québec: Gouvernment de Québec.Google Scholar
Contreras, J and Martínez de Codes, RM (eds) (2013) Trends of Secularism in a Pluralistic World. Madrid: Iberoamericana Vervuert.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corradi, G, Brems, E and Goodale, M (eds) (2017) Human Rights Encounter Legal Pluralism. Normative and Empirical Approaches. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Grillo, RD (2017) Interculturalism and the Politics of Dialogue. Available at www.researchgate.net/publication/321578009 (accessed January 2018).Google Scholar
Malik, M (2012) Minority Legal Orders in the UK: Minorities, Pluralism and the Law. London: British Academy Policy Centre.Google Scholar
Meer, N, Modood, T and Zapata-Barrero, R (eds) (2016) Multiculturalism and Interculturalism: Debating the Dividing Lines. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modood, T and Bovenkerk, F (2017) Multiculturalism – how can Society deal with it? A thinking exercise in Flanders. KVAB Standpunt 51.Google Scholar
Poulter, S (2001) Ethnicity, Law and Human Rights. The English Experience. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Timmermans, F (2016) Commission brings together non-confessional organizations to discuss. Migration, integration and European values: putting values into action. European Commission (Brussels, press release). Available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17-4342_en.htm (accessed January 2017).Google Scholar