No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 April 2020
Although many international guidelines emphasize the need to provide psychoeducational family intervention (PFI) together with pharmacological treatments for optimal management of bipolar I patients, this intervention is not routinely provided in mental health centres.
The Department of Psychiatry of the University of Naples SUN has promoted a study to identify obstacles for the implementation of the PFI in the routine care.
To identify mental health professionals’ benefits and difficulties in the implementation of PFI.
The Family Intervention Schedule was administered to mental health professionals at baseline, at T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 supervision meetings.
Twenty-two mental health professionals were recruited, 45% were psychiatrists, with a mean age of 37.4(±7.3). The participants had been working in psychiatry for a mean of 9.1 (±6.5) years and the majority of them stated to be routinely in contact with patients and their relatives. At the beginning of the study, the highest levels of difficulties regarded:1)the integration of PFI with other work responsibilities;2)the lack of time to run the intervention;3)the identification of suitable families. Among benefits, participants reported an increased feeling of confidence in relation to their work (p<.05) and an improvement in the relationships with the service users’ families (p<.01). Difficulties tended to decrease over time, being absent at the end of the protocol.
Although mental health professionals recognize that PFI has a positive impact on their work, many organizational obstacles prevent its routine use. A possible solution may be the promotion of peer-led PFIs, as already done by the US NAMI.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.