Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T19:23:33.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Personality abnormality in severe mental illness and its influence on outcome of intensive and standard case management: a randomised controlled trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

P. Tyrer*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Mental Health, Division of Neuroscience and Psychological Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine, Paterson Centre, 20 Wharf Road, LondonW2 1PD, UK
C. Manley
Affiliation:
Department of Public Mental Health, Division of Neuroscience and Psychological Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine, Paterson Centre, 20 Wharf Road, LondonW2 1PD, UK
E. Van Horn
Affiliation:
Department of Public Mental Health, Division of Neuroscience and Psychological Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine, Paterson Centre, 20 Wharf Road, LondonW2 1PD, UK
D. Leddy
Affiliation:
Department of Public Mental Health, Division of Neuroscience and Psychological Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine, Paterson Centre, 20 Wharf Road, LondonW2 1PD, UK
O.C. Ukoumunne
Affiliation:
Department of Public Mental Health, Division of Neuroscience and Psychological Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine, Paterson Centre, 20 Wharf Road, LondonW2 1PD, UK
*
* Correspondence and reprints
Get access

Summary

One hundred fifty-five (77%) of 201 participants recruited in a trial of intensive vs standard case management of patients with recurrent psychotic illness had their personality status measured before treatment and were followed up for two years. The primary outcome was the total number of days spent in psychiatric hospitalisation in the two years following randomisation. Thirty-three (21%) of the patients had a personality disorder and their duration of hospital stay (105 days) was greater than in those without personality disorder (56 days). There was weak evidence that intensive case management more effective in reducing the duration of care in those with personality disorder than in those without personality disorder.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 Éditions scientifiques et médicales Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Åsberg, M., Montgomery, S.A., Perris, C., Schalling, D., Sedvall, G.A comprehensive psychopathological rating scale Acta Psychiat Scand 146 1978 529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.J.An introduction to the bootstrap London: Chapman and Hall 1993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenton, W.S., McGlashan, T.H.Risk of schizophrenia in character disordered patients Am J Psychiatry 285 1989 12801284Google Scholar
Jablensky, A., Schwartz, R., Tomov, T.WHO collaborative study of impairments and disabilities associated with schizophrenic disorders: a preliminary communication. Objective and methods Acta Psychiat Scand 41 1980 152163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlashan, T.The Chestnut Lodge follow-up study. ii: Long-term outcome of schizophrenia and affective disorders Arch Gen Psychiatry 8 1984 586601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merson, S., Tyrer, P., Duke, P., Henderson, F.Inter-rater reliability of ICD-10 guidelines for the diagnosis of personality disorders J Pers Dis 272 1994 8995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldham, J.M.Personality disorders: current perspectives JAMA 32 1994 17701776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, J.P., Huxley, P.J., Priebe, S., Kaiser, W.Measuring the quality of life of severely mentally ill people using the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile Soc Psychiat Psychiat Epidem 84 1991 7683Google Scholar
Peralta, V., Cuesta, M.J., de Leon, J.Premorbid personality and positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenia Acta Psychiat Scand 167 1991 336339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelan, M., Slade, M., Thornicroft, G.The Camberwell Assessment of Need: the validity and reliability of an instrument to assess the needs of people with severe mental illness Br J Psychiatry 128 1995 589595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, D., Wender, P.H., Kety, S.S., Welner, J., Schulsinger, F.The adopted-away offspring of schizophrenics Am J Psychiatry 148 1971 307311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siever, L.J., Davis, K.L.A psychobiologic perspective on the personality disorders Am J Psychiatry i 1991 16471658Google Scholar
Tyrer, P.Personality Assessment Schedule PAS-I (ICD-10 version)Personality disorders: diagnosis, management and course 2nd 2000 Butterworth-Heinemann Oxford160180Google Scholar
Tyrer, P., Remington, M.Controlled comparison of day hospital and out-patient treatment for neurotic disorders Lancet 153 1979 10141016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyrer, P., Johnson, T.Establishing the severity of personality disorder Am J Psychiatry 174 1996 15931597Google Scholar
UK700 Group Creed, F., Burns, T., Butler, T., Byford, S., Murray, R., Thompson, S. et al. Comparison of intensive and standard case management for patients with psychosis: rationale of the trial Br J Psychiatry 353 1999 7478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UK700 Group Burns, T., Creed, F., Fahy, T., Thompson, S., Tyrer, P., White, I.Intensive versus standard case management for severe psychotic illness: a randomised trial Lancet 1999 21852189CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UK700 Group Byford, S. et al.Costs of care in intensive versus standard case management for severe psychotic illness: a randomised controlled trial Br J Psychiatry 15 Suppl 1 2000Google Scholar
Van Horn, E, Manley, C, Ukoumunne, O.C, Leddy, D, Cicchetti, D, Tyrer, PProblems in developing an instrument for the rapid assessment of personality status Eur Psychiatry 2000 2933CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.