Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:17:19.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can Salivary Cortisol Assessment from a Single HF-rTMS Session Predict Clinical Outcome in Melancholic Depressed Patients? A Pilot Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

C. Baeken
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, UZBrussel, Brussel, Ghent, Belgium
L. Santermans
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, UZBrussel, Brussel, Ghent, Belgium
D. Zeeuws
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, UZBrussel, Brussel, Ghent, Belgium
R. de Raedt
Affiliation:
Psychology, UGent, Ghent, Belgium
N. Vanderbruggen
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, UZBrussel, Brussel, Ghent, Belgium

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aim:

The underlying physiological mechanisms as to why repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can treat depressed patients remains unclear and no clear biological markers are available to indicate a positive outcome for a given patient. Some data suggest that rTMS can influence hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) processes. In this study, we wanted to evaluate whether one session of high frequency (HF)-rTMS applied on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) can predict a successful treatment outcome in a sample of antidepressant free unipolar depressed patients of the melancholic subtype.

Methods:

Twenty one right-handed treatment resistant depressed patients were studied. Fifty two percent of the patients were considered as treatment responders, as defined by a 50% reduction in her/his baseline 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) score. To examine acute HF-rTMS effects on the HPA- axis, we analyzed salivary cortisol levels, using a sham-controlled, ‘single’ blind, crossover design. Areas under the curves (AUC) were calculated for both real and sham HF-rTMS.

Results:

Real HF-rTMS resulted in salivary cortisol decreases, however only in HF-rTMS non-responders. No HF-rTMS influences were found in the responder group. Sham stimulation did not affect the HPA-axis. Non-responders were found to display a higher level of co-morbid personality disorders.

Conclusion:

Our results may provide more insight into the underlying working mechanisms of HF-rTMS and could add further information about endocrinological functioning in affective disorders. Furthermore, personality features in combination with a ‘super-sensitive’ HPA system could be of importance to predict clinical outcome.

Type
P02-77
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2009
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.