Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:17:19.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing Belief Flexibility with Experience Sampling Methodology in Patients with Acute Psychosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

S. So
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin N.T., Hong Kong China
E. Peters
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
J. Swendsen
Affiliation:
National Center for Scientific Research, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
C. Zhu
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin N.T., Hong Kong China
P. Garety
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
S. Kapur
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Introduction

Belief Flexibility (BF) has been shown to maintain delusional conviction in patients with psychosis, and is a target of psychological intervention for delusions. However, it is unclear how BF responds to antipsychotic treatment. While BF has typically been measured in interview-based assessment, it is of interest whether moment-to-moment changes in BF can be measured reliably using experience sampling methodology (ESM).

Objectives Aims

To assess changes in BF during the first two weeks of antipsychotics, and to examine the validity of assessing BF using ESM.

Methods

Sixteen acute in-patients with delusions completed an ESM assessment 7 times a day on a Personal Digital Assistant over 14 consecutive days (see Table). Symptomatology, delusional dimensions, and BF were also measured in interviews on the first, seventh and fourteenth days.

Results

Multilevel regression models revealed high internal consistency of the ESM items for BF, but low congruence between the ESM and interview measures of BF. Unexpectedly, patients with more flexibility at baseline (on one interview measure) reported increasing delusional conviction on ESM over 14 days (See Figure). On ESM, a higher momentary level of flexibility predicted an increase in conviction in the next moment.

Conclusions

The ESM data of BF were inconsistent with the interview measures and previous studies. The results challenge the validity of assessing BF with a self-report momentary measurement.

Figure 1

Change over time in delusional conviction by baseline belief flexibility (Reaction to Hypothetical Contradiction interview)(N=15)

Table

ESM items on Delusional Conviction and Belief Flexibility

 ItemResponse
Delusional conviction−At this moment, to what extent do you believe this concern is true?1 (not at all) – 7 (very much)
Belief Flexibility− At this moment, to what extent do you think their aie other possible explanations for this concern?1 (not at all) – 7 (very much)
 −At this moment, to what extent do you think you may be mistaken about this concern?1 (not at all) – 7 (very much)
 − Since the last signal, have you noticed anything that makes you question this concern?1 (not at all) 7 (very much)

Type
Article: 0268
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2015
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.