Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:43:42.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AS14-02 - Common and Distinct Treatment Elements in Psychotherapies for Borderline Personality Disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

J. Stoffers
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
B. Völlm
Affiliation:
Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
K. Lieb
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is defined as “a pervasive pattern of instability of interpersonal relationships, self-image, affects, and marked impulsivity” (DSM-IV-TR; APA, 2000). These very characteristics make it difficult to establish firm therapeutic relationships and keep patients in treatment. In recent decades, a number of new psychotherapeutic approaches have been developed in order to meet these specific challenges and demands. To date, there is evidence of efficacy for various treatments, as data of a recent systematic review and meta-analysis of our working group indicate.

Objectives

To give an overview of all psychotherapeutic treatments investigated in randomised controlled trials so far and included in the above mentioned systematic review. To establish common and distinct treatment features of successful psychotherapeutic approaches for BPD treatment and investigate possible relations to treatment outcomes.

Methods

Essential treatment characteristics were extracted from primary studies and surveyed. Subgroup analyses were done where possible with regard to presence/absence of these characteristics in order to investigate possible impacts on treatment outcome.

Results

BPD specific therapies share many similarities like use of explicit treatment frameworks, e.g., as delineated in explicit treatment contracts, and special attention to the therapeutic relationship. However, they differ with regard to treatment intensity and length, provision of complementary group sessions, availability of the therapist in case of crisis or importance of psychodynamic and experiential techniques.

Conclusions

Though stemming from different theoretical backgrounds or schools, various treatments seem both feasible as well as beneficial if applying BPD specific adaptations.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2012
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.