3009 – Randomized, Double-blind, Study of Vortioxetine Versus Agomelatine in Adults with MDD after Inadequate Response to SSRI or SNRI Treatment

Abstract

Introduction

Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) is an investigational antidepressant, a multimodal 5-HT₃, 5-HT₇ and 5-HT_1D receptor antagonist, 5-HT_1B receptor partial agonist, 5-HT_1A receptor agonist and inhibitor of the 5-HT transporter.

Objectives

To compare efficacy and tolerability of flexible-dose treatment with vortioxetine versus agomelatine in MDD patients who presented with an inadequate response to SSRI/SNRI monotherapy.

Aims

The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline to Week 8 in MADRS total score analysed by MMRM using a non-inferiority test. Secondary endpoints included assessment of anxiety symptoms (HAM-A), global clinical judgment (CGI), and overall functioning (SDS).

Methods

Randomized, double-blind comparator study (NCT01488071).

Results

Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to vortioxetine (10-20mg/day) or agomelatine (25-50mg/day) for 12 weeks of double-blind treatment. On the primary efficacy endpoint, vortioxetine (n=252) was statistically significantly superior to agomelatine (n=241) (p< 0.05) by 2.2 MADRS points. Significant differences in favour of vortioxetine were found for the MADRS, HAM-A, CGI-S, CGI-I, and SDS from Week 4 onwards (FAS, MMRM; p< 0.05) and robustness was confirmed by significant differences by ANCOVA (FAS, LOCF). Fewer patients withdrew due to adverse events with vortioxetine (5.9%) than agomelatine (9.5%). Adverse events with the highest incidence were nausea, headache, dizziness and somnolence.

Conclusions

The primary efficacy endpoint of this comparator study was met, with vortioxetine also showing a significant benefit compared to agomelatine in MDD patients who changed antidepressant after an inadequate response to SSRI/SNRI treatment. Statistically significant differences were seen from Week 4 onwards. This study confirms that vortioxetine is efficacious and well-tolerated.