Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T05:42:56.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Where do radical right parties stand? Position blurring in multidimensional competition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2012

Jan Rovny
Jan Rovny*
Affiliation:
Center for European Research, Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden
*
*E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article questions the utility of assessing radical right party placement on economic issues, which has been extensively analyzed in academic literature. Starting from the premise that political parties have varying strategic stakes in different political issues, the article considers political competition in multiple issue dimensions. It suggests that political competition is not simply a matter of taking positions on political issues, but rather centers on manipulating the dimensional structure of politics. The core argument is that certain political parties, such as those of the radical right, seek to compete on neglected, secondary issues while simultaneously blurring their positions on established issues in order to attract broader support. Deliberate position blurring – considered costly by the literature – may thus be an effective strategy in multidimensional competition. The article combines quantitative analyses of electoral manifestos, expert placement of political parties, and voter preferences, by studying seventeen radical right parties in nine Western European party systems.

Keywords

radical rightspatial theoryobfuscationdimensionality
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 1 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alvarez, R.M. (1998), Information and Elections, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, L.M. (1986), ‘Issue voting under uncertainty: an empirical test’, American Journal of Political Science 4: 709–728.Google Scholar
Benoit, K.Laver, M. (2006), Party Policy in Modern Democracies, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Betz, H.-G. (1994), Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bjørklund, T.Andersen, J.G. (1999), Anti-Immigration Parties in Denmark and Norway: The Progress Parties and the Danish People's Party. Institut for Økonomi, Politik og Forvaltning, Aalborg: Aalborg Universitet.Google Scholar
Budge, I.Farlie, D. (1983), Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Budge, I., Robertson, D.Hearl, D. (1987), Ideology, Strategy and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in 19 Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carmines, E.G.Stimson, J.A. (1989), Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chappell, H.Keech, W. (1986), ‘Policy motivation and party differences in a dynamic spatial model of party competition’, American Political Science Review 80(3): 881–899.Google Scholar
de Lange, S. (2007), ‘A new winning formula? The programmatic appeal of the radical right’, Party Politics 13(4): 411–435.Google Scholar
Derks, A. (2006), ‘Populism and the ambivalence of egalitarianism. How do the underprivileged reconcile a right wing party preference with their socio-economic attitudes?’, World Political Science Review 2(3): 175–200.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Enelow, J.Hinich, M.J. (1981), ‘A new approach to voter uncertainty in the Downsian spatial model’, American Journal of Political Science 25(3): 483–493.Google Scholar
Enelow, J.M.Hinich, M.J. (1989), ‘A general probabilistic spatial theory of elections’, Public Choice 61(2): 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Election Study (EES) (2004), Retrieved 22 November 2011 from www.ees-homepage.netGoogle Scholar
European Social Survey Round 3 Data (2006), Data file edition 3.3. Norwegian Social Science Data Services, Norway – Data Archive and distributor of ESS data. Retrieved 22 November 2011 from http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/Google Scholar
Evans, J.A.J. (2005), ‘The dynamics of social change in radical right-wing populist party support’, Comparative European Politics 3(1): 76–101.Google Scholar
Fallend, F. (2004), ‘Are right-wing populism and government participation incompatible? The case of the freedom party of Austria’, Representation 40(2): 115–130.Google Scholar
Franklin, C.H. (1991), ‘Eschewing obfuscation? Campaigns and the perception of US senate incumbents’, The American Political Science Review 85(4): 1193–1214.Google Scholar
Golder, M. (2003), ‘Explaining variation in the success of extreme right parties in Western Europe’, Comparative Political Studies 36(4): 432–466.Google Scholar
Hainsworth, P. (ed.) (2000), ‘Introduction’ The Politics of the Extreme Right, London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Hainsworth, P. (2007), The Extrme Right in Western Europe. Routledge.Google Scholar
Heinisch, R. (2003), ‘Success in opposition – failure in government: explaining the performance of right-wing populist parties in public office’, West European Politics 26(3): 91–130.Google Scholar
Hooghe, L., Marks, G.Wilson, C.J. (2002), ‘Does left/right structure party positions on European integration?’, Comparative Political Studies 35(8): 965–989.Google Scholar
Hooghe, L., Bakker, R., Brigevich, A., De Vries, C., Edwards, E.E., Marks, G., Rovny, J., Steenbergen, M.Vachudova, M.A. (2010), ‘Reliability and validity of measuring party positions: The Chapel Hill Expert Surveys of 2002 and 2006’, European Journal of Political Research 49(5): 687–703.Google Scholar
Hotelling, H. (1929), ‘Stability in competition’, Economic Journal 39(153): 41–57.Google Scholar
Ignazi, P. (2003), Extreme Right Parties in Western Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ISSP Research Group, International Social Survey Programme (ISSP): IV Government Responsibilities, (2006). Distributor: GESIS Cologne Germany ZA4850. Retrieved 22 November 2011 from http://www.issp.org/Google Scholar
Ivarsflaten, E. (2005), ‘The vulnerable populist right parties: no economic re-alignment fuelling their electoral success’, European Journal of Political Research 44(3): 465–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, H. (1992), ‘Formation of party systems in East Central Europe’, Politics and Society 20(1): 7–50.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. (2004), ‘Diversification and reconfiguration of party systems in postindustrial democracies’, Europäische Politik (03/2004), Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Retrieved 22 November 2011 from http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id/02608.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, H. (2007), ‘Growth and persistence of the radical right in postindus-trial democracies: advances and challenges in comparative research’, West European Politics 30(5): 1176–1206.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H.McGann, A.J. (1995), The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S.Frey, T. (2008), West European Politics in the Age of Globalization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kropko, J. (2008), ‘Choosing between Multinomial Logit and Multi-nomial Probit models for analysis of unordered choice data’, Midwest Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Laver, M.Hunt, B.W. (1992), Party and Policy Competition, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lipset, S.M. (1981), Political Man (Expanded Edition), Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, S.M.Rokkan, S. (1967), Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Luther, K.R. (2003), ‘The self-destruction of a right-wing populist party? The Austrian Parliamentary Election of 2002’, West European Politics 26(2): 136–152.Google Scholar
MacDonald, S.E., Listhaug, O., Rabinowitz, G. (1991), Issues and Party Support in Multiparty Systems, The American Political Science Review 85(4): 1107–1131.Google Scholar
Marks, G., Hooghe, L., Nelson, M.Edwards, E.E. (2006), ‘Party competition and European integration in the East and West: different structure, same causality’, Comparative Political Studies 39(2): 155–175.Google Scholar
McGann, A.Kitschelt, H. (2005), ‘The radical right in the Alps: Evolution of support for the Swiss SVP and Austrian FPO’, Party Politics 11(2): 147–171.Google Scholar
Meguid, B. (2005), ‘Competition between unequals: the role of mainstream party strategy in Niche party success’, American Political Science Review 99(3): 347–359.Google Scholar
Meguid, B. (2008), Party Competition Between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (1996), ‘The war of words defining the extreme right party family’, West European Politics 19(2): 225–248.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2007), Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, P. (2005), Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Petrocik, J.R. (1996), ‘Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study’, American Journal of Political Science 40: 825–850.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, G.Macdonald, S.E. (1989), ‘A directional theory of issue voting’, American Political Science Review 83(1): 93–121.Google Scholar
Riker, W.H. (1982), Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice, San Francisco: WH Freeman.Google Scholar
Riker, W.H. (1986), The Art of Political Manipulation, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rovny, J., Marks, G. (2011), ‘Issues and dimensions in public opinion’, unpublished manuscript. .Google Scholar
Rydgren, J. (2005), ‘Is extreme right-wing populism contagious? Explaining the emergence of a new party family’, European Journal of Political Research 44(3): 413–437.Google Scholar
Schofield, N. (1993), ‘Political competition and multiparty coalition governments’, European Journal of Political Research 23(1): 1–33.Google Scholar
Shepsle, K.A. (1972), ‘The strategy of ambiguity: uncertainty and electoral competition’, The American Political Science Review 66(2): 555–568.Google Scholar
Steenbergen, M.Marks, G. (2007), ‘Evaluating expert surveys’, European Journal of Political Research 46(3): 347–366.Google Scholar
Taggart, P. (1995), ‘New populist parties in Western Europe’, West European Politics 18(1): 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vachudova, M.A.Hooghe, L. (2009), ‘Postcommunist politics in a magnetic field: how transition and EU accession structure party competition on European integration’, Comparative European Politics 7(2): 179–212.Google Scholar
Van der Brug, W., Fennema, M.Tillie, J. (2005), ‘Why some anti-immigrant parties fail and others succeed: a two-step model of aggregate electoral support’, Comparative Political Studies 38(5): 537–573.Google Scholar
Volkens, Andrea/Lacewell, Onawa/Lehmann, Pola/Regel, Sven/Schultze, Henrike/Werner, Annika (2011), The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR), Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).Google Scholar
World Values Survey 1981–2000. v20060423. World Values Survey Association. Retrieved 22 November 2011 from www.worldvaluessurvey.orgGoogle Scholar