Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:40:36.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Women, Peace and Security after Europe's ‘refugee crisis’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2020

Aiko Holvikivi*
Affiliation:
Centre for Women, Peace, and Security, London School of Economics and Political Science
Audrey Reeves
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Since its inception in 2000, the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda has conceptualised the conflict-affected woman as a subject worthy of international attention, protection, and inclusion. In the wake of Europe's ‘refugee crisis’, this article examines how the remit of WPS has broadened from women in conflict zones to refugees in Europe's borderlands. A minority of European states now attend, in their WPS policy, to these conflict-affected women on the move. This inclusion productively challenges established notions of where conflict-affectedness is located. It exposes Europe as not always peaceful and safe for women, especially refugees who flee war. Conversely, the dominant tendency to exclude refugees from European WPS policy is built on a fantasy of Europe as peaceful and secure for women, which legitimises the fortressing of Europe and obscures European states’ complicity in fuelling insecurity at their borders, cultivating an ethos of coloniality around the WPS agenda. The inclusion of refugees is no panacea to these problems. If focused solely on protection, it repositions European states as protective heroes and conflict-affected women as helpless victims. The WPS framework nonetheless emphasises conflict-affected women's participation in decision-making and conflict prevention, opening space for recognising the refugee women as political actors.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 United Nations, ‘Transcript of Security Council Open Debate on Women, Peace and Security 28 October 2014’, available at: {http://www.peacewomen.org/sites/default/files/wpsdebateoctober2014.pdf} accessed 23 January 2020.

2 Cook, Sam, ‘The “woman-in-conflict” at the UN Security Council: A subject of practice’, International Affairs, 92:2 (2016), pp. 353–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Otto, Dianne, ‘The Security Council's alliance of gender legitimacy: The symbolic capital of Resolution 1325’, in Charlesworth, Hilary and Coicaud, Jean-Marc (eds), Fault Lines of International Legitimacy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 239–75Google Scholar.

4 Olonisakin, Funmi and Barnes, Karen, ‘Introduction’, in ’Olonisakin, Funmi, Barnes, Karen, and Ikpe, Eka (eds), Women, Peace and Security: Translating Policy into Practice (New York: Routledge, 2011), pp. 314Google Scholar (p. 7).

5 Women's International League for Peace and Freedom, ‘Member States’, available at: {http://peacewomen.org/member-states} accessed 16 March 2020; Cohn, Carol, ‘Mainstreaming gender in UN security policy: A path to political transformation?’, in Rai, Shirin and Waylen, Georgina (eds), Global Governance: Feminist Perspectives (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), pp. 185206CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Enloe, Cynthia, Seriously! Investigating Crashes and Crises as if Women Mattered (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2013), p. 9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Gibbings, Sheri Lynn, ‘No angry women at the United Nations: Political dreams and the cultural politics of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 13:4 (2011), pp. 522–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Cook, ‘The “woman-in-conflict”’, p. 365.

9 Gibbings, ‘No angry women’.

10 Cook, ‘The “woman-in-conflict”’, p. 365.

11 United Nations, ‘Transcript’, p. 8.

12 Cook, ‘The “woman-in-conflict”’.

13 Aiko Holvikivi and Audrey Reeves, ‘The WPS agenda and the “refugee crisis”: Missing connections and missed opportunities in Europe’, in Laura Shepherd and Paul Kirby (eds), LSE Centre for Women, Peace and Security Working Paper Series, LSE (2017), available at: {http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/wps/2017/06/26/the-wps-agenda-and-the-refugee-crisis-missing-connections-and-missed-opportunities-in-europe-aiko-holvikivi-and-audrey-reeves-62017/} accessed 6 September 2017.

14 Parashar, Swati, ‘The WPS agenda: A postcolonial critique’, in Davies, Sara E. and True, Jacqui (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Women, Peace, and Security (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 829–39Google Scholar; Pratt, Nicola, ‘Reconceptualising gender, reinscribing racial-sexual boundaries in international security: The case of UN Security Council Resolution 1325 on “Women, Peace and Security”’, International Studies Quarterly, 57:4 (2013), pp. 772–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Basu, Soumita, ‘Gender as national interest at the UN Security Council’, International Affairs, 92:2 (2016), pp. 255–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cohn, ‘Mainstreaming gender’; Olonisakin, Barnes, and Ikpe (eds), Women, Peace and Security; Kirby, Paul and Shepherd, Laura J., ‘The futures past of the Women, Peace and Security agenda’, International Affairs, 92:2 (2016), pp. 373–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar; de Almagro, Maria Martin and Ryan, Caitlin, ‘Subverting economic empowerment: Towards a postcolonial-feminist framework on gender (in)securities in post-war settings’, European Journal of International Relations, 25:4 (2019), pp. 1059–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Reeves, Audrey, ‘Feminist knowledge and emerging governmentality in UN peacekeeping’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 14:3 (2012), pp. 348–69Google Scholar.

16 Moffette, David and Vadasaria, Shaira, ‘Uninhibited violence: Race and the securitization of immigration’, Critical Studies on Security, 4:3 (2016), pp. 291305CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Basham, Victoria M., ‘Liberal militarism as insecurity, desire and ambivalence: Gender, race and the everyday geopolitics of war’, Security Dialogue, 49:1–2 (2018), pp. 3243CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gray, Harriet and Franck, Anja K., ‘Refugees as/at risk: The gendered and racialized underpinnings of securitization in British media narratives’, Security Dialogue, 50:3 (2019), pp. 275–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Little, Adrian and Vaughan-Williams, Nick, ‘Stopping boats, saving lives, securing subjects: Humanitarian borders in Europe and Australia’, European Journal of International Relations, 23:3 (2016), pp. 533–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Anzaldúa, Gloria, Borderlands: The New Mestiza = La Frontera (4th edn, San Fransisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books, 2012), p. 35Google Scholar.

18 Löfflmann, Georg and Vaughan-Williams, Nick, ‘Vernacular imaginaries of European border security among citizens: From walls to information management’, European Journal of International Security, 3:3 (2018), pp. 382400CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Freedman, Jane, Gendering the International Asylum and Refugee Debate (2nd edn, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), p. 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Holmes, Seth M. and Castañeda, Heide, the, ‘RepresentingEuropean refugee crisis” in Germany and beyond: Deservingness and difference, life and death’, American Ethnologist, 43:1 (2016), pp. 1224Google Scholar; ‘Europe migrant crisis’, BBC, available at: {https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-32395181} accessed 26 November 2018; European Commission, ‘Refugee Crisis in Europe’, available at: {http://ec.europa.eu/echo/refugee-crisis} accessed 26 November 2018.

19 Tania Karas, ‘The Women and Children Turning to Europe’, UNHCR UK, available at: {https://www.unhcr.org/news/stories/2016/3/573c653e4/women-children-turning-europe.html} accessed 12 January 2019.

20 Freedman, Jane, ‘Engendering security at the borders of Europe: Women migrants and the mediterranean “crisis”’, Journal of Refugee Studies, 29:4 (2016), pp. 568–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar (p. 568).

21 Pickering and Cochrane, cited in Freedman, ‘Engendering security’, p. 570.

22 Freedman, Jane, ‘Sexual and gender-based violence against refugee women: A hidden aspect of the refugee “crisis”’, Reproductive Health Matters, 24:47 (2016), pp. 1826CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

23 UNHCR, UNFPA, and Women's Refugee Commission, ‘Protection Risks for Women and Girls in the European Refugee and Migrant Crisis: Greece and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia’, p. 7, available at: {http://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/resource-pdf/EuropeMission_Protection_Risks_19_Jan_Final_0.pdf} accessed 29 January 2018.

24 European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, ‘Monthly Data Collection on the Current Migration Situation in the EU’, available at: {https://fra.europa.eu/en/theme/asylum-migration-borders/overviews/focus-gender-based-violence} accessed 23 January 2020.

25 Amanda Russell Beattie, Patrycja Rozbicka, and Gemma Bird, ‘We must open our eyes to the injustices facing child refugees’, HuffPost UK, available at: {https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/child-refugees_uk_5b503e8fe4b0fd5c73c24176} accessed 12 January 2019.

26 Russell Beattie, Rozbicka, and Bird, ‘We must open our eyes’.

27 Freedman, ‘Sexual and gender-based violence’; European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, ‘Monthly Data Collection’.

28 United Nations, ‘Transcript’, p. 8.

29 Ibrahim, Aisha Fofana, ‘Connecting testimony, trauma, and memory: The Sierra Leone experience’, Pacific Coast Philology, 44:2 (2009), pp. 249–71Google Scholar.

30 Uppsala Conflict Data Program, ‘Definitions’, available at: {https://pcr.uu.se/research/ucdp/definitions/} accessed 2 October 2019.

31 Barkawi, Tarak, ‘Decolonising war’, European Journal of International Security, 1:2 (2016), pp. 199214CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 Carr, Matthew, Fortress Europe: Inside the War Against Immigration (London: C. Hurst & Co., 2015), p. 5Google Scholar.

33 Walters, William, ‘Imagined migration world: The European Union's anti-illegal immigration discourse’, in Geiger, Martin and Pécoud, Antoine (eds), The Politics of International Migration Management (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), pp. 7395CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Carr, Fortress Europe, p. 5; Löfflmann and Vaughan-Williams, ‘Vernacular imaginaries’, p. 388.

35 UNITED, ‘About the “List of Deaths”’, available at: {http://unitedagainstrefugeedeaths.eu/about-the-campaign/about-the-united-list-of-deaths/} accessed 20 March 2020.

36 European Parliament, ‘EU Migrant Crisis: Facts and Figures’, available at: {http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/society/20170629STO78630/eu-migrant-crisis-facts-and-figures} accessed 29 January 2018.

37 De Genova, Nicholas, ‘The “migrant crisis” as racial crisis: Do Black Lives Matter in Europe?’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 41:10 (2018), pp. 1765–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar (p. 1779).

38 Giles, Wenona and Hyndman, Jennifer, ‘Introduction: Gender and conflict in a global context’, in Giles, Wenona Mary and Hyndman, Jennifer (eds), Sites of Violence: Gender and Conflict Zones (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004), pp. 323 (p. 6)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also Cynthia Cockburn, ‘The continuum of violence: A gender perspective on war and peace’, in Giles and Hyndman (eds), Sites of Violence, pp. 24–44; Cuomo, Chris J., ‘War is not just an event: Reflections on the significance of everyday violence’, Hypatia, 11:4 (1996), pp. 3045CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39 Anzaldúa, Borderlands, p. 25.

40 Freedman, Jane, ‘Women seeking asylum’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 10:2 (2008), pp. 154–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lucy Hall, ‘WPS, migration, and displacement’, in Davies and True (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Women, Peace, and Security, pp. 643–56.

41 Amnesty International UK et al., ‘Syria Response Consultations on the UK National Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security’, available at: {http://gaps-uk.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Syria-NAP-Consultations-report.pdf} accessed 25 June 2018.

42 United Nations, ‘Transcript’, p. 9, emphasis added.

43 Cook, ‘The “woman-in-conflict”’, p. 371; see also Thomson, Jennifer, ‘The Women, Peace, and Security agenda and feminist institutionalism: A research agenda’, International Studies Review, 21:4 (2018), pp. 598613CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 Albeit recognising that such action may be constrained. See, for example, Madhok, Sumi, ‘Action, agency, coercion: Reformatting agency for oppressive contexts’, in Madhok, Sumi, Phillips, Anne, and Wilson, Kalpana (eds), Gender, Agency, and Coercion (Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2013), pp. 102–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mahmood, Saba, Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005)Google Scholar.

45 Madhok, Sumi, Phillips, Anne, and Wilson, Kalpana, ‘Introduction’, in Madhok, Phillips, and Wilson (eds), Gender, Agency, and Coercion (Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2013), pp. 113 (p. 3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Butler, Judith, Undoing Gender (New York, NY: Routledge, 2004), p. 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 Hall, ‘WPS, migration, and displacement’, p. 4; see also Freedman, ‘Women seeking asylum’.

47 Gray and Franck, ‘Refugees as/at risk’, p. 283.

48 United Nations, ‘Transcript’, p. 9, emphasis added.

49 Ibid., pp. 27, 41–2, 48, 72, 79.

50 NGO Working Group on Women, Peace and Security, ‘Open Letter to Permanent Representatives to the UN: Recommendations on the Security Council Open Debate on Women, Peace and Security (WPS)’, available at: {http://www.womenpeacesecurity.org/resource/open-letter-unsc-wps-anniversary-october-2016/} accessed 25 June 2018.

51 NGO Working Group on Women, Peace and Security, ‘Statement by Ms. Mina Jaf at UN Security Council Open Debate on Sexual Violence in Conflict’, available at: {https://www.womenpeacesecurity.org/resource/statement-unsc-sexual-violence-open-debate-may-2017/} accessed 20 March 2020.

52 Government of the UK, ‘UK National Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security 2018 to 2022’, p. 1, available at: {https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/uk-national-action-plan-on-women-peace-and-security-2018-to-2022} accessed 23 January 2020.

53 True, Jacqui, ‘Explaining the global diffusion of the Women, Peace and Security agenda’, International Political Science Review, 37:3 (2016), pp. 307–23 (p. 313)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54 Government of Finland, ‘Finland's National Action Plan 2012–2016’, p. 11, available at: {http://www.peacewomen.org/assets/file/finland_nap_2012.pdf} accessed 23 January 2020.

55 Shepherd, Laura J., ‘Making war safe for women? National Action Plans and the militarisation of the Women, Peace and Security agenda’, International Political Science Review, 37:3 (2016), pp. 324–35 (p. 332)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; see also Kunz, Rahel and Maisenbacher, Julia, ‘Women in the neighbourhood: Reinstating the European Union's civilising mission on the back of gender equality promotion?’, European Journal of International Relations, 23:1 (2015), pp. 122–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See, for example, Government of Finland, ‘Women, Peace and Security: Finland's National Action Plan 2018–2021’, p. 59, available at: {http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-281-327-5} accessed 23 January 2020; Government of Belgium, ‘Women, Peace and Security: Belgian National Action Plan on the Implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1325’, p. 26, available at: {http://peacewomen.org/sites/default/files/Belgium%20NAP%201325%202013-2016%20EN.pdf} accessed 29 January 2018; Government of Germany, ‘Action Plan of the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany on the Implementation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace and Security for the Period 2017–2020’, p. 20, available at: {https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/blob/286988/2462039ccaa1326a195da2e962048596/170111-aktionsplan-1325-data.pdf} accessed 23 January 2020.

56 LSE Centre for Women, Peace and Security, ‘UK National Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security: Consultation Response’, available at: {http://www.lse.ac.uk/women-peace-security/assets/documents/2017/LSEWPS-UKNAP-2017.pdf} accessed 25 June 2018; Amnesty International UK et al., ‘Syria Response’; Government of the UK, ‘NAP 2018–2022’.

57 UNHCR, ‘National Action Plans (NAPs) on UNSCRs on Women, Peace and Security: Extracts and Analysis of Text on Forced Displacement and Statelessness’ (Geneva: UNHCR, 2016).

58 Similarly to Green, Penny and Grewcock, Mike, ‘The war against illegal immigration: State crime and the construction of a European identity’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 14:1 (2002), pp. 87101CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59 True, ‘Explaining the global diffusion’; Krook, Mona Lena and True, Jacqui, ‘Rethinking the life cycles of international norms: The United Nations and the global promotion of gender equality’, European Journal of International Relations, 18:1 (2010), pp. 103–27Google Scholar.

60 Kofman, Eleonore and Sales, Rosemary, ‘Towards fortress Europe?’, Women's Studies International Forum, 15:1 (1992), pp. 2939CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

61 OECD, also known as ‘a club of rich countries’, Buttonwood, ‘What is the OECD?’, The Economist, available at: {https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2017/07/05/what-is-the-oecd} accessed 23 January 2020.

62 Scott, Joan Wallach, ‘Deconstructing equality-versus-difference: Or, the uses of post-structuralist theory for feminism’, Feminist Studies, 14:1 (1988), pp. 3250 (p. 37)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 Similarly to Shepherd, ‘Making war safe’, p. 332.

64 See for example, Kunz and Maisenbacher, ‘Women in the neighbourhood’, p. 125; Barkawi, ‘Decolonising war’.

65 Anzaldúa, Borderlands, p. 102.

66 Government of Finland, ‘NAP 2018–2021’, p. 10; Government of Spain, ‘II Plan nacional de acción de mujeres, paz y seguridad 2017–2023’, available at: {http://www.exteriores.gob.es/Portal/es/SalaDePrensa/Multimedia/Publicaciones/Documents/2017_II%20PLAN%20NACIONAL%20ESP%20web.pdf} accessed 23 January 2020.

67 Government of Finland, ‘NAP 2018–2021’, p. 40.

68 Keygnaert, Ines et al. , Senperforto Frame of Reference for Prevention of SGBV in the European Reception and Asylum Sector (Ghent: Magelaan cvba, 2010)Google Scholar; Mackay, Angela, Border Management and Gender, ed. Bastick, Megan and Valasek, Kristin, Gender and Security Sector Reform Toolkit (Geneva: DCAF, OSCE/ODIHR, UN-INSTRAW, 2008)Google Scholar.

69 Government of Germany, ‘NAP 2017–2020’, pp. 17, 22.

70 Government of Finland, ‘NAP 2018–2021’, pp. 54–5.

71 AkiDwa, ‘Ireland's Second National Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security’, available at: {http://akidwa.ie/irelands-second-national-action-plan-on-women-peace-and-security/} accessed 25 June 2018.

72 Government of Ireland, ‘Ireland's Second National Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security, 2015–2018’, available at: {http://www.peacewomen.org/sites/default/files/Revised%20NAP%20Ireland%20(2015-2018).pdf} accessed 23 January 2020.

73 Shepherd, ‘Making war safe’, p. 332.

74 Government of Germany, ‘NAP 2017–2020’, pp. 17, 22.

75 This echoes an understanding of ‘participation as deliberation’, already present in other aspects of the WPS agenda. Thomson, ‘The Women, Peace, and Security agenda and feminist institutionalism’, p. 604; see also O'Rourke, Catherine, ‘“Walk[ing] the halls of power?” Understanding women's participation in international peace and security’, Melbourne Journal of International Law, 15:1 (2014), pp. 128–54Google Scholar.

76 Government of France, ‘France's Second National Action Plan: Implementation of the United Nations Security Council “Women, Peace and Security” Resolutions 2015–2018’, p. 20, available at: {http://peacewomen.org/sites/default/files/2014-2016%20WPS%20NAP%20France.pdf} accessed 5 April 2017.

77 Government of Belgium, ‘NAP 2013–2016’, p. 7.

78 Government of France, ‘NAP 2015–2018’, p. 20; Government of Belgium, ‘NAP 2013–2016’, p. 7; Government of the Czech Republic, ‘The Action Plan of the Czech Republic to implement Security Council Resolution UN Security Council no. 1325 (2000) on Women, Peace and Security and Related Resolutions for the Years 2017–2020’, p. 25, available at: {http://www.lse.ac.uk/women-peace-security/assets/documents/2019/NAP/NAPCzech-Republic2017.pdf} accessed 23 January 2020.

79 Eisenstein, Zillah, Sexual Decoys: Gender, Race and War in Imperial Democracy (London: Zed Books, 2007), p. 94Google Scholar.

80 Government of the Czech Republic, ‘NAP 2017–2020’, pp. 21, 23, 25, 27, 28.

81 Saleh, Fadi, ‘Queer/humanitarian visibility: The emergence of the figure of the suffering Syrian gay refugee’, Middle East Critique, 29:1 (2020), pp. 4767CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

82 Holmes and Castañeda, ‘Representing the “European refugee crisis”’, p. 19; Farris, Sara R., In the Name of Women's Rights: The Rise of Femonationalism (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

83 As also observed in the case of ‘compassionate borderwork’ identified by Little and Vaughan-Williams, ‘Stopping boats’, p. 542.

84 Keygnaert, Ines et al. , ‘Sexual and gender-based violence in the European asylum and reception sector: A perpetuum mobile?’, European Journal of Public Health, 25:1 (2015), pp. 90–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Mackay, Border Management, p. 9.

85 Government of Spain, ‘NAP 2017–2023’, p. 31.

86 Karen McVeigh, ‘Abusive men “using immigration fears to control women”’, The Guardian, available at: {https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/may/02/abusive-men-using-uk-immigration-fears-to-control-women} accessed 25 June 2018.

87 Government of Spain, ‘NAP 2017–2023’, p. 21; Government of Italy, ‘Italy's Third National Action Plan, in accordance with UN Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000), 2016–2019’, pp. 20–1, available at: {http://www.peacewomen.org/sites/default/files/49123_f_PlanofAction132520162019%20(1).pdf} accessed 25 June 2018.

88 Government of the UK, ‘United Kingdom National Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security 2014–2017’, p. 9, available at: {http://peacewomen.org/sites/default/files/UK%20Revised%20NAP%20(2014-2017).pdf} accessed 6 April 2017; Government of the UK, ‘NAP 2018–2022’, p. 24.

89 Informal exchange with attendee, London, 20 June 2018.

90 Aroussi, Sahla, ‘National Action Plans on Women, Peace and Security as tools of foreign policy: Reconsidering gender security in the west’, in Aroussi, Sahla (ed.), Rethinking National Action Plans on Women, Peace and Security (Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2017), pp. 2940 (p. 34)Google Scholar.

91 Government of the UK, ‘NAP 2018–2022’, p. 22.

92 Government of Denmark, ‘Denmark's National Action Plan for implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace and Security 2014–2019’, p. 15, available at: {http://peacewomen.org/sites/default/files/Denmark%20National%20Action%20Plan%202014-2019.pdf} accessed 29 January 2018.

93 Council of the European Union, ‘Comprehensive Approach to the EU Implementation of the United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1325 and 1820 on Women, Peace and Security’, p. 6, available at: {http://peacewomen.org/sites/default/files/eu_comprehensive_eu_approach_to_the_implementation_of_unscr_1325_and_1820_december2008.pdf} accessed 9 October 2015.

94 Miller, Barbara, Pournik, Milad, and Swaine, Aisling, Women in Peace and Security through United Nations Security Resolution 1325: Literature Review, Content Analysis of National Action Plans, and Implementation (Washington, DC: George Washington University Institute for Global and Development Studies, 2014), p. 11Google Scholar; Shepherd, ‘Making war safe’, pp. 331–2.

95 Doty, Roxanne Lynn, Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North-South Relations (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1996)Google Scholar.

96 Whitworth, Sandra, Men, Militarism & UN Peacekeeping: A Gendered Analysis (London: Lynne Rienner, 2004)Google Scholar; Paris, Roland, ‘International peacebuilding and the “mission civilisatrice”’, Review of International Studies, 28:4 (2002), pp. 637–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

97 Väyrynen, Tarja, ‘Gender and UN peace operations: The confines of modernity’, International Peacekeeping, 11:1 (2004), pp. 125–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Duffield, Mark, Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security (London: Zed Books, 2001)Google Scholar; Little and Vaughan-Williams, ‘Stopping boats’; Audrey Macklin, ‘Like oil and water, with a match: Militarized commerce, armed conflict, and human security in Sudan’, in Giles and Hyndman (eds), Sites of Violence, pp. 75–107.

98 Kunz and Maisenbacher, ‘Women in the neighbourhood’.

99 Ferbach, Sarah and Reeves, Audrey, The Role of Parliaments in NATO Member Countries in Advancing the Women, Peace and Security Agenda, DCAF (Geneva, 2018), p. 13Google Scholar, available at: {https://www.dcaf.ch/sites/default/files/publications/documents/NATO%20PA%20DCAF%202018%20Role%20of%20NATO%20Parliaments%20in%20Advancing%20WPS%20agenda.pdf} accessed 12 January 2018.

100 Anzaldúa, Borderlands, p. 25, emphasis in original.

101 De Genova, ‘The “migrant crisis”’.

102 Weber, Cynthia, Queer International Relations: Sovereignty, Sexuality and The Will to Knowledge (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 81–2Google Scholar; Reuveny, Rafael X. and Thompson, William R., ‘The North–South divide and international studies: A symposium’, International Studies Review, 9:4 (2007), pp. 556–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Little and Vaughan-Williams, ‘Stopping boats’, p. 540.

103 Weber, Queer International Relations, pp. 73, 82; Green and Grewcock, ‘The war’, p. 98.

104 Holmes and Castañeda, ‘Representing the “European refugee crisis”’, p. 114; Ahmed, Sara, The Cultural Politics of Emotion (2nd edn, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2014), p. 77Google Scholar; De Genova, ‘The “migrant crisis”’.

105 Freedman, ‘Sexual and gender-based violence’.

106 Guerrina, Roberta and Wright, Katharine A. M., ‘Gendering normative power Europe: Lessons of the Women, Peace and Security agenda’, International Affairs, 92:2 (2016), pp. 293312CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

107 Holvikivi and Reeves, ‘The WPS agenda and the “refugee crisis”’.

108 Holmes and Castañeda, ‘Representing the “European refugee crisis”’, p. 20.

109 Farris, In the Name of Women's Rights, p. 7.

110 Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, ‘Can the subaltern speak?’, in Chrisman, Laura and Williams, Patrick (eds), Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: A Reader (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993), pp. 66111Google Scholar; Pratt, ‘Reconceptualising gender’; Farris, In the Name of Women's Rights.

111 United Nations, ‘Transcript’, p. 9.

112 Kirby and Shepherd, ‘The futures past of the Women, Peace and Security agenda’; Hagen, Jamie J., ‘Queering Women, Peace and Security’, International Affairs, 92:2 (2016), pp. 313–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Watson, Callum, ‘Begging the question: What would a men, peace and security agenda look like?’, Connections, 14:3 (2015), pp. 4560CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Turner, Lewis, ‘Syrian refugee men as objects of humanitarian care’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 21:4 (2019), pp. 595616CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

113 Aoláin, Fionnuala Ní, ‘The “war on terror” and extremism: Assessing the relevance of the Women, Peace and Security agenda’, International Affairs, 92:2 (2016), pp. 275–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ahmed, The Cultural Politics of Emotion, p. 79.