Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:10:23.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stonehenge, Wiltshire, UK: High Resolution Geophysical Surveys in the Surrounding Landscape, 2011

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Timothy Darvill*
Affiliation:
School of Applied Sciences, Bournemouth University, Dorset, UK
Friedrich Lüth*
Affiliation:
Deutsches Archäologisches Institut, Berlin, Germany
Knut Rassmann*
Affiliation:
Römisch-Germanische Kommission, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Andreas Fischer*
Affiliation:
SENSYS Sensorik und Systemtechnologie GmbH, Bad Saarow, Germany
Kay Winkelmann*
Affiliation:
Berlin, Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An extensive high-resolution geophysical survey covering 2 km2 was undertaken to the north of Stonehenge in June and October 2011. The survey is important in providing, for the first time, abundant detail on the form and structure of the Stonehenge Cursus, including the recognition of entrances in both of the long sides. Much additional information about the internal form of round barrows in the Cursus Round Barrow Cemetery, the course of the Avenue, the course of the so-called Gate Ditch, and numerous tracks and early roads crossing the landscape was recorded. A series of previously unrecognized features were identified: a pit-arc or cove below a barrow on the west side of King Barrow Ridge, a square-shaped feature surrounded by pits on the east side of Stonehenge Bottom, and a linear ditch on the same solstical axis, and parallel to, the southern section of the Stonehenge Avenue. An extensive scatter of small metallic anomalies marking the position of camping grounds associated with the Stonehenge Free Festival in the late 1970s and early 1980s raise interesting conservation and management issues.

En juin et octobre 2011, une vaste prospection géophysique à haute résolution fût effectuée sur une surface de deux kilomètres carrés au nord de Stonehenge. L'importance de cette étude réside dans le fait que pour la première fois on a pu obtenir d'abondants détails sur la forme et la structure du Cursus de Stonehenge, avec l'identification d'entrées sur les deux côtés longs. Une grande quantité d'informations supplémentaires sur la forme interne des tumuli ronds dans le Cursus Round Barrow Cemetery (cimetière des tumuli ronds du Cursus), sur le cours de l'Avenue ainsi que sur le cours du soi-disant Gate Ditch (fossé de la porte) a pu être récoltée. De plus, de nombreuses traces et anciens chemins traversant le paysage ont été enrégistrées. Toute une série de structures non identifiées préalablement ont pu être reconnues: une fosse en forme d'arc ou caverne en-dessous d'un tumulus du côté ouest du King Barrow Ridge, une structure carrée entourée de fosses du côté est de Stonehenge Bottom, et un fossé linéaire sur le même axe solstical et parrallèle à la partie méridionale de la Stonehenge Avenue. Un vaste éparpillement de petites anomalies métalliques marquant l'emplacement du camping associé au Stonehenge Free Festival fin des années 1970 et début des années 1980 soulève un intéressant éventail de questions sur la conservation et la gestion. Translation by Isabelle Gerges.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Im Juni und Oktober 2011 wurde nördlich von Stonehenge eine hochauflösende geophysikalische Prospektion auf einer Gesamtfläche von 2 km2 durchgeführt. Diese Prospektion lieferte zum ersten Mal detaillierte Aufschlüsse über Form und Struktur des Stonehenge Kursus, und es gelang, mehrere Zugänge in beiden Langseiten der Anlage zu identifizieren. Darüberhinaus konnten sehr viele Detailinformationen zur inneren Gliederung und zum Aufbau von Rundhügeln im Barrow Hügelgräberfeld, zum Verlauf der Avenue und zum Verlauf des sogenannten Torgrabens sowie zahlreicher neu entdeckter Wagenspuren gewonnen werden, die kreuz und quer über das gesamte prospektierte Gelände verlaufen. Eine ganze Reihe weiterer bis dato unbekannter Objekte konnte identifiziert werden: eine bogenförmige Grubenstruktur unter einem Grabhügel im Westen des ‘King Barrow Ridge’, eine rechteckige, von Gruben kreisförmig umgebene Struktur östlich des Stonehenge Tiefs, sowie ein linear auf der Sonnenwenden-Achse und parallel zum südlichen Abschnitt der Stonehenge Avenue verlaufender Graben. Ein dichter Schleier von kleinen metallischen Anomalien kennzeichnet die Fläche eines Zeltplatzlagers, das während der Stonehenge Festivals in den späten 70er und frühen 80er Jahren genutzt wurde, und wirft neue Fragen zu Konservierungs- und Managementstrategien auf.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2013 

References

Amadio, L., Bishop, S. 2010. Stonehenge World Heritage Site Landscape Project: The Cursus Barrows and Surrounding Area. Archaeological Survey Report. Swindon: English Heritage Research Department Report Series 85–2010 [accessed 3 August 2012]. Available at: <http://research.english-heritage.org.uk/report/?14926>.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2010. Britain in Archaeology: Stonehenge. British Archaeology, 115: 9.Google Scholar
Ashbee, P. 1978. Amesbury Barrow 51: Excavation 1960. Wiltshire Archaeological Magazine, 70/ 71(1975/76): 160.Google Scholar
Ashbee, P. 1980. Amesbury Barrow 39: Excavation 1960. Wiltshire Archaeological Magazine, 74/ 75(1979/80): 134.Google Scholar
Atkinson, R.J.C., Piggott, C.M., Sandars, N.K. 1951. Excavations at Dorchester, Oxon. First Report. Oxford: Ashmolean Museum.Google Scholar
Barclay, A., Halpin, C. 1999. Excavations at Barrow Hills, Radley, Oxfordshire. Volume 1. The Neolithic and Bronze Age Monument Complex. Oxford: Oxford Archaeological Unit (Thames Valley Landscapes 11).Google Scholar
Bewley, R.H., Crutchley, S.P., Shell, C.A. 2005. New Light on an Ancient Landscape: LiDAR Survey in the Stonehenge World Heritage Site. Antiquity, 79: 636–47.Google Scholar
Bishop, S. 2011. Stonehenge World Heritage Site Landscape Project: King Barrow Ridge. Archaeological Survey Report. Swindon: English Heritage Research Department Report Series 83–2011 [accessed 3 August 2012]. Available at <http://research.english-heritage.org.uk/report/?15035>.Google Scholar
Buckley, D.G., Hedges, J.D., Brown, N. 2001. Excavations at a Neolithic Cursus, Springfield, Essex, 1979–85. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 67: 101–62.Google Scholar
Burl, A. 1988. Coves: Structural Enigmas of the Neolithic. Wiltshire Archaeological Magazine, 82: 118.Google Scholar
Burl, A. 1997. The Sarsen Horseshoe Inside Stonehenge: A Rider. Wiltshire Archaeological Magazine, 90: 112.Google Scholar
Chippindale, C. 1978. The Enclosure of Stonehenge. Wiltshire Archaeological Magazine, 70/ 71(1975/1976): 109–23.Google Scholar
Christie, P.M. 1963. The Stonehenge Cursus. Wiltshire Archaeological Magazine, 58: 370–82.Google Scholar
Cleal, R.M.J., Walker, R.K.E., Montague, R. 1995. Stonehenge in its Landscape. Twentieth-Century Excavations. London: English Heritage (Archaeological Report 10).Google Scholar
Colt Hoare, Sir R. 1812. The Ancient History of Wiltshire. Volume I. London: William Miller [reprinted with an introduction by J. Simmons & D. D. A. Simpson, 1975, Wakefield: EP Publishing].Google Scholar
Crawford, O.G.S. 1924. The Stonehenge Avenue. Antiquaries Journal, 4: 5759.Google Scholar
Darvill, T. ed. 1991. Stonehenge Conservation and Management Project Environmental Statement. Volume III: Technical Appendices. London: Debenham Tewson and Chinnocks for English Heritage (Limited circulation printed report).Google Scholar
Darvill, T. 1996. Prehistoric Britain from the Air. A Study of Space, Time and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Darvill, T. 1997. Ever Increasing Circles: The Sacred Geography of Stonehenge and its Landscape. In: Cunliffe, B., Renfrew, C. eds. Science and Stonehenge. Oxford: The British Academy (Proceedings of the British Academy 92), pp. 167202.Google Scholar
Darvill, T. 1999. Billown Neolithic Landscape Project, Isle of Man. Fifth Report: 1999. Bournemouth: Bournemouth University (School of Conservation Sciences Research Report 7).Google Scholar
Darvill, T. 2005. Stonehenge World Heritage Site: An Archaeological Research Framework. London and Bournemouth: English Heritage and Bournemouth University.Google Scholar
Darvill, T. 2006. Stonehenge: The Biography of a Landscape. Stroud: History Press.Google Scholar
Darvill, T. 2010. Prehistoric Britain, 2nd ed. London: Routledge (World Archaeology).Google Scholar
Darvill, T., Wainwright, G. 2009. Stonehenge Excavations 2008. Antiquaries Journal, 89: 119.Google Scholar
David, A., Payne, A. 1997. Geophysical Surveys Within the Stonehenge Landscape: A Review of Past Endeavour and Future Potential. Proceedings of the British Academy, 92: 73113.Google Scholar
Furholt, M., Lüth, F., Müller, J. 2011. Introduction. In: Furholt, M., Lüth, F., Müller, J. eds. Megaliths and Identities. Early Monuments and Neolithic Societies from the Atlantic to the Baltic. Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH (Schwerpunktprogramme 1400 Frühe Monumentalität und soziale Differenzierung Band 1), pp. 1115.Google Scholar
Gaffney, C., Gaffney, V., Neubauer, W. 2011. Methodological and Archaeological Challenges of the Stonehenge Hidden Landscapes Project. In: Drahor, M.G., Berge, M.A. eds. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Archaeological Prospection. Izmir: Archaeology and Arts Publications, pp. 180–82.Google Scholar
Gaffney, C., Gaffney, V., Neubauer, W., Baldwin, E., Chapman, H., Garwood, P., Moulden, H., Sparrow, T., Bates, R., Löcker, K., Hinterleitner, A., Trinks, I., Nau, E., Zitz, T., Floery, S., Verhoeven, G., Doneus, M. 2012a. The Stonehenge Hidden Landscapes Project. Archaeological Prospection, 19: 14155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaffney, V., Garwood, P., Baldwin, E., Neubauer, W., Gaffney, C. 2012b. The Stonehenge Hidden Landscapes Project. Past, 71: 1416.Google Scholar
Gillings, M., Pollard, J., Wheatley, D., Petersen, R. 2008. Landscape of the Megaliths. Excavation and Fieldwork on the Avebury Monuments, 1997–2003. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Grinsell, L.V. 1957. Archaeological Gazetteer. In: Pugh, R.B., Crittall, E. eds. A History of Wiltshire. Volume I, Part 1. London: Institute of Historical Research/Oxford University Press (Victoria History of the Counties of England), pp. 21279.Google Scholar
Grinsell, L.V. 1978. The Stonehenge Barrow Groups. Salisbury: Salisbury and South Wiltshire Museum.Google Scholar
Harding, J., Barclay, A. 1999. An Introduction to the Cursus Monuments of Neolithic Britain and Ireland. In: Barclay, A., Harding, J. eds. Pathways and Ceremonies. The Cursus Monuments of Britain and Ireland. Oxford: Oxbow (Neolithic Studies Group Seminar Papers 4), pp. 110.Google Scholar
Harding, P., Gingell, C. 1986. The Excavation of Two Long Barrows by F. De M. and H.F.W.L. Vatcher. Wiltshire Archaeological Magazine, 80: 722.Google Scholar
Hawkins, G.S. 1965. Stonehenge Decoded. London: Souvenir Press.Google Scholar
Hawley, W. 1924. Fourth Report on the Excavations at Stonehenge. Antiquaries Journal, 4: 3039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodder, I. 1984. Burials, Houses, Women and Men in the European Neolithic. In: Miller, D., Tilley, C. eds. Ideology, Power and Prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (New Directions in Archaeology), pp. 5168.Google Scholar
Jackson, C. 1976. The Excavation of Neolithic and Bronze Age Sites at Aldwincle, Northants, 1967–71. Northamptonshire Archaeology, 11: 1270.Google Scholar
Jones, G., Maki, D.L. 2005. Lightning-Induced Magnetic Anomalies on Archaeological Sites. Archaeological Prospection, 12 (3): 191–97.Google Scholar
Laidler, B., Young, W.E.V. 1938. A Surface Flint Industry from a Site Near Stonehenge. Wiltshire Archaeological Magazine, 58: 150–60.Google Scholar
Leivers, M., Moore, C. 2008. Archaeology on the A303 Stonehenge Improvement. Salisbury: Wessex Archaeology.Google Scholar
Loveday, R. 2006. Inscribed Across the Landscape: The Cursus Enigma. Stroud: Tempus.Google Scholar
Lynch, F., Musson, C. 2001. A Prehistoric and Early Medieval Complex at Llandegai, Near Bangor, North Wales. Archaeologia Cambrensis, 150: 17142.Google Scholar
McOmish, D. 2001. Aspects of Prehistoric Settlement in Western Wessex. In: Collis, J. ed. Society and Settlement in Iron Age Europe. Sheffield: J.R.Collis Publishing (Sheffield Archaeology Monograph 11), pp. 7381.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M. 2012. Stonehenge. Exploring the Greatest Stone Age Mystery. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M., Ramilisonina, . 1998. Stonehenge for the Ancestors: The Stones Pass on the Message. Antiquity, 72: 308–26.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M., Pollard, J., Thomas, J., Welham, K. 2010. Newhenge. British Archaeology, 110: 1421.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M., Pollard, J., Thomas, J., Welham, K., Rylatt, J., Casswell, C., Chan, B., Dover, M., Nunn, B. 2009. Stonehenge Riverside Project 2009. Excavations at the Riverside End of the Stonehenge Avenue. Sheffield: Sheffield University Department of Archaeology and Prehistory (limited circulation printed report).Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M., Richards, C., Allen, M., Payne, A., Welham, K. 2004. The Stonehenge Riverside Project. Research Design and Initial Results. Journal of Nordic Archaeological Science, 14: 4560.Google Scholar
Pearson, T., Field, D. 2011. Stonehenge World Heritage Site Landscape Project: Stonehenge Cursus, Amesbury, Wiltshire. Archaeological Survey Report. Swindon: English Heritage Research Department Report Series 103–2011 [accessed 3 August 2012]. Available at <http://research.english-heritage.org.uk/report/?15055, http://research.english-heritage.org.uk/report/?15055>.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on Historical Monuments (England). 1979. Stonehenge and its Environs. Monuments and Land Use. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, J. 1990. The Stonehenge Environs Project. London: English Heritage (HBMCE Archaeological Report 16).Google Scholar
Stonehenge Riverside Project. 2007. Excavation V. The Stonehenge Greater Cursus [accessed 14 July 2011]. Available at <http://www.sheffield.ac.uk/archaeology/research/stonehenge/stonehenge07-05.html>..>Google Scholar
Stonehenge Riverside Project. 2008. The Stonehenge Riverside Project Fieldwork in 2008 [accessed 14 July 2011]. Available at <http://www.sheffield.ac.uk/archaeology/research/stonehenge/index.html>..>Google Scholar
Stone, J.F.S. 1948. The Stonehenge Cursus and its Affinities. Archaeological Journal, 104: 719.Google Scholar
Stukeley, W. 1740. Stonehenge. A Temple Restor'd to the British Druids. London: W. Innys and R. Manby.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 2006. On the Origins and Development of Cursus Monuments in Britain. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 72: 229–42.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., Marshall, P., Parker Pearson, M., Pollard, J., Richards, C., Tilley, C., Welham, K. 2009. The Date of the Greater Stonehenge Cursus. Antiquity, 83: 4053.Google Scholar
Wainwright, G.J. 1979. Mount Pleasant, Dorset: Excavations 1970–1971. London: Society of Antiquaries of London Reports of the Research Committee 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittle, A.W.R., Atkinson, R.J.C., Chambers, R., Thomas, N. 1992. Excavations in the Neolithic and Bronze Age Complex at Dorchester-on-Thames, Oxfordshire, 1947–1952 and 1981. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 58: 143202.Google Scholar
Woodward, A.B., Woodward, P. 1996. The Topography of Some Barrow Cemeteries in Bronze Age Wessex. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 62: 275–92.Google Scholar
Worthington, A. 2004. Stonehenge: Celebration and Subversion. Loughborough: Alternative Albion.Google Scholar