No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Metin I. Eren, ed. Hunter-Gatherer Behavior: Human Response during the Younger Dryas (Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, 2012, 281pp., hbk, ISBN 978-1-59874-602-0)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 January 2017
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2014
References
Coombes, P. & Barber, K.
2005. Environmental Determinism in Holocene Research: Causality or Coincidence?
Area, 37 (3): 303–11.Google Scholar
Gamble, C., Davies, W., Pettitt, P. & Richards, M.
2004. Climate Change and Evolving Human Diversity in Europe during the Last Glacial. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 359 (1442): 243–54.Google Scholar
Garcin, Y., Vincens, A., Williamson, D., Buchet, G. & Guiot, J.
2007. Abrupt Resumption of the African Monsoon at the Younger Dryas-Holocene Climatic Transition. Quaternary Science Reviews, 26 (5): 690–704.Google Scholar
Madsen, D.B., Jingzen, L., Elston, R.G., Cheng, X., Bettinger, R.L., Kan, G., Brantigham, P.J. & Kan, Z.
1998. The Loess/Paleosol Record and the Nature of the Younger Dryas Climate in Central China. Geoarchaeology, 13 (8): 847–69.3.0.CO;2-6>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloney, B.K.
1995. Evidence for the Younger Dryas Climatic Event in Southeast Asia. Quaternary Science Reviews, 14 (9): 949–58.Google Scholar
Moore, A.M.T. & Hillman, G.C.
1992. The Pleistocene to Holocene Transition and Human Economy in Southwest Asia: The Impact of the Younger Dryas. American Antiquity, 57 (3): 482–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richerson, P.J., Boyd, R. & Bettinger, R.L.
2001. Was Agriculture Impossible during the Pleistocene but Mandatory during the Holocene? A Climate Change Hypothesis. American Antiquity, 66 (3): 387–411.Google Scholar
Sluyter, A.
2003. Neo-Environmental Determinism, Intellectual Damage Control, and Nature/Society Science. Antipode, 35 (4): 813–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar