Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T19:09:22.266Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Emilie Sibbesson , Ben Jervis and Sarah Coxon , eds. Insight from Innovation: New Light on Archaeological Ceramics. Papers Presented in Honour of Professor David Peacock's Contributions to Archaeological Ceramic Studies (Southampton Monographs in Archaeology, New Series 6. St. Andrews: The Highfield Press, 2016, xxxvi and 277pp., 85 colour and b/w illustr., 13 tables, ISBN: 978-0-9926336-4-6)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2017

Maja Gori*
Affiliation:
Institut für Ur-und Frühgeschichte und Vorderasiatische Archäologie, University of Heidelberg, Germany — IRISS, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Italy

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aimers, J.J., Farthing, D.J. & Shugar, A.N. 2012. Handheld XRF Analysis of Maya Ceramics: A Pilot Study Presenting Issues Related to Quantification and Calibration. In: Shugar, A.N. & Mass, J.L., eds. Handheld XRF for Art and Archaeology (Studies in Archaeological Science 3). Leuven: Leuven University Press, pp. 423–48.Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. ed. 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frahm, E. 2013. Validity of ‘Off-The-Shelf’ Handheld Portable XRF for Sourcing Near Eastern Obsidian Chip Debris. Journal of Archaeological Science 40(2): 1080–92. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.06.038 Google Scholar
Frahm, E. & Doonan, R.C. 2013. The Technological versus Methodological Revolution of Portable XRF in Archaeology. Journal of Archaeological Science 40(2): 1425–34. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.10.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knappett, C., Pirrie, D., Power, M.R., Nikolakopoulou, I., Hilditch, J. & Rollinson, G.K. 2011. Mineralogical Analysis and Provenancing of Ancient Ceramics using Automated SEM-EDS Analysis (QEMSCAN®): A Pilot Study on LB I Pottery from Akrotiri, Thera. Journal of Archaeological Science 38(2): 219‒32. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.08.022 Google Scholar
Peacock, D.P.S. 1982. Pottery in the Roman World: An Ethnoarchaeological Approach. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Peacock, D.P.S. 1997. La ceramica romana: tra archeologia ed etnografia. Bari: Edipuglia.Google Scholar
Speakman, R.J. & Shackley, M.S. 2013. Silo Science and Portable XRF in Archaeology: A Response to Frahm. Journal of Archaeological Science 40(2): 1435–43. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.09.033 Google Scholar