Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:22:23.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crossing the Boundaries: Triple Horns and Emblematic Transference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Miranda J. Green
Miranda J. Green*
Affiliation:
SCARAB Research Centre, University of Wales College, Newport
*
[email: [email protected]]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores one aspect of the way in which cult-iconography of the later Iron Age and Roman periods in non-Classical Europe broke the rules of mimetic (life-copying) representation, with, reference to a particular motif: the triple horn. The presence of three-horned images within the iconographic repertoire of western Europe during this period clearly illustrates two aspects of such rule-breaking. On the one hand, the image of the triple-horned bull – well-known in the archaeological record, particularly of Roman Gaul – exemplifies a recurrent Gallo-Roman and Romano-British tradition in which realism was suppressed in favour of emphasis to the power of three. On the other hand, the triple-horned emblem is not confined to the adornment of bulls but may, on occasion, be transferred to ‘inappropriate’ images, both of animals which are naturally hornless and of humans. Such emblematic transference, with its consequence of dissonance and contradiction in the visual message, on the one hand, and the presence of symbolism associated with boundaries and transition, on the other, suggests the manipulation of motifs in order to endow certain images with a particular symbolic energy, born of paradox, the deliberate introduction of disorder or chaos and the expression of liminality. The precise meaning conveyed by such iconographic ‘anarchy’ is impossible to grasp fully but – at the least – appears to convey an expression of ‘otherness’ in which order imposed by empirical observation of earthly ‘reality’ is deemed irrelevant to other states of being and to the supernatural world.

Cet article examine la manière dont au cours de la période de l'Age de Fer et de la période romaine, au sein de l'Europe non-classique, l'iconographie liée à culte transgresse les règles de la représentation mimétique (représentation qui imite la vie), et traite en particulier du motif de la triple corne. Durant cette période, la presence d'images à trois cornes au sein du répertoire iconographique de l'Europe occidentale, illustre clairement deux aspects de cette transgression. D'une part, l'image du taureau à trois cornes – bien connue des études archeologiques, en particulier dans la Gaule romaine – est un bon exemple d'une tradition gallo-romaine et romano-britannique récurrente dans laquelle le réalisme a été supprimé pour mieux mettre en valeur la puissance du chiffre trois. D'autre part, l'emblème de la triple corne ne se limite pas à l'orttementation des taureaux, mais peut parfois être appliqué à des images inappropriées Comme celles d'humains et d'animaux qui ne possèdent pas de cornes à l'état naturel. Un tel transfert emblématique, avec les dissonances et contradict qui s'ensuivent dans le message visuel, d'une part, et la présence du symbolisme associé aux notions de transgression et de transition, d'autre part, suggère qu'on a manipulé ces motifs afin de doter certaines de ces images d'une énergie symbolique particuliére née d'un paradoxe, et qu'on a délibérément introduit du désordre et du chaos ainsi qu'une expression liminale. Il est impossible de saisir la signification précise contenue dans une telle anarchie iconographique, mais cela semble – pour le moins – évoquer une notion d'altérité, dans laquelle l'ordre imposé par l'observation empirique de la réalité du monde n'est pas jugé pertinent face aux autres façons d'être et au monde surnaturel.

Dieser Aufsatz untersucht einen Aspekt der Art und Weise, in der die Kultikonographie der späteren Eisenzeit und römischen Periode im nicnt-klassischen Europa die Regeln mimetischer (naturgetreuer) Repräsentation brachunter Bezug auf das spezielle Motiv des dreifachen Horns. Das Auftreten dreifach gehörnter Motive im ikonographischen Repertoire Westeuropas in dieser Zeitperiode zeigt deutlich zwei Aspekte solchen Regelbruchs. Zum einen veranschaulicht das Bild des dreifach gehörnten Stiers, das vor allem im römischen Gallien archäologisch gut belegt ist, eine Wiederkehrende gallisch-römische und romano-britische Tradition, in der Realismos hinter eine Betonung der Macht der Drei zürückstand. Zum anderen ist das dreifach gehörnte Emblem nicht auf das Verzieren von Stieren beschränkt, sondern kann gelegentlich auch auf ‘unpassende’ Motive übertragen werden, etwa Tiere, die in der Natur hornlos sind, oder Menschen. Solche emblematische Übertragung, die zum einen zu Dissonanz und Widerspruch in der bildlichen Botschaft führt, und zum anderen zusammen mit Symbolen auftritt, die mit Grenzen und Übergangen assoziiert sind, legt eine Manipulation von Motiven nähe. Dies geschah zu dem Zweck, bestimmte Bilder mit einer besonderen symbolischen Energie auszustatten, die einem Paradox, der bewussten Einführung von Unordnung oder Chaos und dem Ausdruck von Liminalität entstammte. Es ist unmöglich, die exakte Bedeutung vollkommen zu begreifen, die eine solche ikonographische ‘Anarchie’ zum Ausdruck bringt, aber sie scheint jedenfalls eine ‘Andersheit’ zum Ausdruck zu bringen, in der die Ordnung, die eine empirische Beobachtung irdischer ‘Realität’ nahe legt, gegenüber anderen Seinszustanden und der übernatürlichen Weit für irrelevant gehalten wird.

Keywords

cultGallo-RomaniconographyritualRomano-Britishshamanismtriple horns
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , 1998 , pp. 219 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 Sage Publications 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnheim, Rudolf, 1967. Art and Visitai Perception. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Bailey, J.B., 1915. Catalogue of Roman inscribed and sculptured stones… at Mary-port, and preserved at Netherhall. Transactions of the Cumberland and Westmorland Antiquarian and Archaeological Society 15:135–72.Google Scholar
Barnard, Sylvia, 1985. The Matres of Roman Britain. Archaeological Journal 142: 237–44.Google Scholar
Bémont, Colette, 1983–4. L'Art Celtique en Gaule 1983–1984. Paris: Direction des Musées de France.Google Scholar
Benoit, Fernand, 1969. L'Art primitif méditerranéan de la vallée du Rhone. Aix-en-Provence: Annales de la Faculté des Lettres.Google Scholar
Birley, Eric, 1986. The Deities of Roman Britain. Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt: 3–112. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Blackmore, James, 1996: Outlining a ‘new’ region: the rock art of the Omburo Ost, Namibia. Lecture delivered at the Theoretical Archaeology Group Conference, University of Liverpool, December 16–18.Google Scholar
Boucher, Stephanie, 1976. Recherches sur les bronzes figurés de Gaule pré-romaine et romaine. Paris/Rome: École Française de Rome Palais Farnèse.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, C., 1991. Divana I. Divinités et ex-voto du culte Gallo-Romain de l'eau. Paris: De Boccard.Google Scholar
Chaloupka, George, 1993. You gotta have style. In Lorblanchet, Michel and Bahn, Paul G. (eds), Rock Art Studies. The Post-Stylistic Era or Where do we go from here?: 77–98. Oxford: Oxbow Monograph no. 35.Google Scholar
Chaloupka, George, undated. Burrunguy. Nourlangie Rock. Sydney: Northart, National Library of Australia/Australian Museum.Google Scholar
Chipp, Herschal B., 1968. Theories of Modern Art. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Clottes, Jean and Lewis-Williams, David, 1996. Les Chamanes de la Préhistoire. Paris: Éditions Seuil.Google Scholar
Coles, John, 1990. Images of the Past. A Guide to the rock carvings and other ancient monuments of northern Bohuslän. Uddevalla: Risbergs Tryckeri.Google Scholar
Coles, John, 1994. Rock Carvings of Uppland. A Guide. Uppsala: Societas Archaeologica Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Colombet, Alain and Lebel, Paul, 1953a. Les Taureaux à trois cornes. Revue Archéologique de l'Est et du Centre-Est 4: 130ff. Google Scholar
Colombet, Alain and Lebel, Paul, 1953b. Mythologie gallo-romaine. Revue Archéologique de l'Est et du Centre-Est 4: 108–30.Google Scholar
Conkey, Margaret and Gero, Joan, 1991. Tensions, Pluralities and Engendering Archaeology. In Gero, J. and Conkey, M. (eds), Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory: 3–30. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Creighton, John, 1995. Visions of Power: Imagery and Symbols in Late Iron Age Britain. Britannia 26: 285–301.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, Barry, 1993. Danebury. London: Batsford/English Heritage.Google Scholar
Davidson, Hilda Ellis, 1993. Introduction. In Davidson, Hilda Ellis (ed.), Boundaries and Thresholds: 7–12. Stroud: Thimble Press (Papers from a Colloquium of the Katherine Briggs Club/Folklore Society).Google Scholar
Dayet, M., 1954. Le sanglier à trois cornes du Cabinet des Medailles. Revue Archéologique de l'Est et du Centre-Est 5: 334–5.Google Scholar
Derevenski, Joanna, 1997. Age and gender at the site of Tiszapolgár-Basatanya, Hungary. Antiquity 71: 875–97.Google Scholar
Deyts, Simone, 1976. Sculptures Gallo-Romaines Mythologiques et Religieuses. Paris: Éditions des Musées Nationaux.Google Scholar
Deyts, Simone, 1983. Les Bois Sculptés des Sources de la Seine. Paris: XLIIe supplément à Gallia.Google Scholar
Dronfield, Jeremy, 1993. Ways of seeing, ways of telling: Irish passage tomb art, style and the universality of vision. In Lorblanchet, Michel and Bahn, Paul G. (eds), Rock Art Studies: The Post-Stylistic Era or Where do we go from here?: 179–93, Oxford: Oxbow Monograph no. 35.Google Scholar
Duval, Paul-Mari, 1961. Paris Antique. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Duval, Paul-Mari, 1987. Monnaies gauloises et mythes celtiques. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Espérandieu, Émile, 1907–60. Recueil Général des Bas-Reliefs de la Gaule Romaine et Pré-Romaine. Paris: Ernest Leroux.Google Scholar
Ferguson, John, 1980. Greek and Roman Religion. A Source Book. Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Press.Google Scholar
Foster, Jennifer, 1977. Bronze Boar Figurines in Iron Age and Roman Britain. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Foster, Jennifer, 1986. The Lexden Tumulus. A re-appraisal of an Iron Age burial from Colchester, Essex. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
Galliou, Patrick, 1984. Days of Wine and Roses? Early Armorica and the Atlantic Wine Trade. In Macready, Sarah and Hugh Thompson, F. (eds), Cross-Channel Trade between Gaul and Britain in the Pre-Roman Iron Age: 24–36. London: Society of Antiquaries.Google Scholar
Girard, Réné, 1977. Violence and the Sacred. London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Grant, Annie, 1984. Animal Husbandry in Wessex and the Thames Valley. In Cunliffe, Barry and Miles, David (eds), Aspects of the Iron Age in Central Southern Britain: 102–119. Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology Monograph no. 2.Google Scholar
Green, Miranba, 1989. Symbol and Image in Celtic Religious Art. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Green, Miranda, 1991. Triplism and Plurality: Intensity and Symbolism in Celtic Religious Expression. In Garwood, Paul, Jennings, David, Skeates, Robin and Toms, Judith (eds), Sacred and Profane. Proceedings of a Conference on Archaeology, Ritual and Religion, Oxford 1989: 100–109; Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology Monograph no. 32.Google Scholar
Green, Miranda, 1992. Animals in Celtic Life and Myth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Green, Miranda, 1997. Images in opposition: polarity, ambivalence and liminality in cult-representation. Antiquity 71: 898–911.Google Scholar
Gruel, Katherine, 1989. La Monnaie chez les Gaulois. Paris: Errance.Google Scholar
Harrison, Richard J., 1995, Bronze Age Expansion 1750–1250 BC: The Cogotas I Phase in the Middle Ebro Valley. Veleia 12: 67–77.Google Scholar
Hauser, Arnold, 1962. The Social History of Art 4; Naturalism, Impressionism, The Film Age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1987. The contextual analysis of symbolic meanings. In Hodder, Ian (ed.), The Archaeology of Contextual Meanings: 1–10. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jope, E. Martyn, 1987. Celtic Art: Expressiveness and Communication Through 2500 Years. Proceedings of the British Academy 73: 97–123.Google Scholar
Kempe, A.B., 1890, On the Relation between the Logical Theory of Classes and the Geometrical Theory of Points. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 21.Google Scholar
Krauss, Rosalind, 1988. The Im/pulse to see. In Foster, Hal (ed.), Vision and Visuality: 51–78. Seattle, WA: Bay Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Peter, 1988. Greek Drama. In Boardman, John, Griffin, Jasper and Murray, Oswald (eds), Greece and the Hellenistic World: 150–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Williams, J. David and Dowson, Thomas A., 1988. The signs of all times: entoptic phenomena in Upper Palaeolithic art. Current Anthropology 29 (2): 201–45.Google Scholar
Liebeschütz, John Hugo Wolfgang Gideon, 1979. Continuity and Change in Roman Religion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lorblanchet, Michel and Ann Sieveking, 1997. The Monsters of Pergouset. Cambridge Journal of Archaeology 7 (1): 37–56.Google Scholar
Macartney, Simon, 1996. Sailing into ecstasy: visions of the Naoide, shamanism and Scandinavian rock art. Lecture delivered at the Theoretical Archaeology Group Conference, University of Liverpool, December 16–18, 1996.Google Scholar
Megaw, John Vincent Stanley, 1970. Art of the European Iron Age. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Megaw, Ruth and Vincent, , 1989. Celtic Art from its Beginnings to the Book of Kells. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Musée Archéologique de Saintes, 1984. Saintes à la recherche de ses dieux. Saintes: Musée Archéologique.Google Scholar
Nechtvatal, Joseph, 1997. Immersive Implications. In Ascott, Roy (ed.), Consciousness Reframed, Abstracts from the 1st International Centre for Advanced Inquiry into Interactive Art Research Conference 68. Newport: University of Wales College, Newport.Google Scholar
Northover, Peter, 1995. The technology of metalwork: bronze and gold. In Green, Miranda (ed.), The Celtic World: 285–309. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
O'Rahilly, Thomas, 1946. Early Irish History and Mythology. Dublin: University College Dublin Institute of Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Orwell, George, 1954. Nineteen Eighty-Four. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Peacock, David, 1984. Amphorae in Iron Age Britain. A Reassessment. In Macready, Sarah and Hugh Thompson, F. (eds), Cross-Channel Trade Between Gaul and Britain in the Pre-Roman Iron Age: 37–42. London: Society of Antiquaries.Google Scholar
Preucel, Robert and Hodder, Ian, 1996. Contemporary Archaeology in Theory: A Reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Read, Herbert, 1982. What is Revolutionary Art? In Frascina, Francis and Harrison, Charles (eds), Modern Art and Modernism: 123–7. London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Rees, Alwyn and Rees, Brynley, 1961. Celtic Heritage. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Romeuf, Anne-Marie, 1986. Ex-voto en bois de Chamalières (Puy-de-Dome) et des sources de la Seine. Essai de Comparaison. Gallia 44 Fasc. 1:65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Anne, 1961. The horned god of the Brigantes. Archaeologia Aeliana 39 (4): 59–85.Google Scholar
Schindler, R., 1977. Führer durch des Landesmuseum Trier. Trier: Selbstverlag des Rheinischen Landesmuseums.Google Scholar
Shanks, Michael, 1996. Style and Design of a Perfume Jar from an Archaic Greek City State. In Preucel, Robert W. and Hodder, Ian (eds), Contemporary Archaeology in Theory: A Reader: 364–93. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sherratt, Andrew, 1991. Sacred and profane substances: the ritual use of narcotics in later Neolithic Europe. In Garwood, Paul, Jennings, David, Skeates, Robin and Toms, Judith (eds), Sacred and Profane, Proceedings of a Conference on Archaeology, Ritual and Religion, Oxford 1989: 50–64. Oxford: Oxford University Committee for Archaeology Monograph no. 32.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor, 1966. Colour Classification in Ndembu Ritual. In Banton, Michael (ed.), Anthropological Approaches to the Study of Religion: 47–84. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
van Arsdell, Robert, 1989. Celtic Coinage of Britain. London: Spink.Google Scholar
Vencl, Slawomil, 1994. The archaeology of thirst. Journal of European Archaeology 2 (2): 299–326.Google Scholar
Vitebsky, Piers, 1995. The Shaman. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
von Petrikovits, Harald, 1987. Matronen und Verwandte Gottheiten. Ergebnisse eines Kolloquiums Veranstaltet von der Göttinger Akademiekommission für de Altertumskunde Mittel- und Nordeuropas: 241–54. Köln/Bonn: Beihäfte der Bonner Jahrbücher, Band 44.Google Scholar
Witken, Robert, 1995. Art and Social Structure, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Zachar, Lev, 1987. Keltische Kunst in der Slowakei. Bratislava: Tatran.Google Scholar