Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T03:26:10.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The attitudes of patients and health care personnel to rectal drug administration following day case surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2006

S. A. Colbert ,
D. O’Hanlon ,
O. McAnena  and
N. Flynn
S. A. Colbert
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia, University College Hospital, Galway, Republic of Ireland
D. O’Hanlon
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, University College Hospital, Galway, Republic of Ireland
O. McAnena
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, University College Hospital, Galway, Republic of Ireland
N. Flynn
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia, University College Hospital, Galway, Republic of Ireland
Get access

Abstract

The use of suppositories has been examined following a recent case in which an anaesthetist was reported to the United Kingdom General Medical Council. This study examined the preference for routes of administration of post-operative analgesia. A semi-structured interview with a written questionnaire was administered to 610 subjects (49 doctors; 62 nurses; 67 paramedical staff; 44 other hospital employees; 388 patients). Four hundred and fifty (74%) preferred the intravenous (i.v.) route, 24 (4%) preferred a suppository while 136 (22%) found either route acceptable. The i.v. route was most popular with young (98% under 20 years) females (79%) social class I subjects (90%), doctors (96%), nurses (95%), those who had never had a suppository (81%) and those who had ill effects following a previous suppository (95%). This result suggests that patients are more tolerant of suppositories than hospital staff but the majority prefer the i.v. route.

Keywords

analgesiasuppositoryintravenousnon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugsgeneral anaesthesia
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , July 1998 , pp. 422 - 426
Copyright
1998 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)