Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:09:03.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An evaluation of the contributions by fresh gas flow rate, carbon dioxide concentration and desflurane partial pressure to carbon monoxide concentration during low fresh gas flows to a circle anaesthetic breathing system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2008

S.-Z. Fan ,
Y.-W. Lin ,
W.-S. Chang  and
C.-S. Tang
S.-Z. Fan
Affiliation:
National Taiwan University, College of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Taiwan, ROC
Y.-W. Lin
Affiliation:
Fu-Jen Catholic University, College of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Taiwan, ROC
W.-S. Chang
Affiliation:
National Taiwan University, College of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Taiwan, ROC
C.-S. Tang*
Affiliation:
Fu-Jen Catholic University, College of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Taiwan, ROC
*
Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, 510 Chung Cheng Road, Hsinchuang, Taipei County 24205, Taiwan, ROC. E-mail: [email protected]; Tel: +886 2 29053433; Fax: +886 2 29056385
Get access

Summary

Background and objective

Numerous in vitro studies have shown that volatile anaesthetics react with desiccated carbon dioxide (CO2) absorbents to produce carbon monoxide (CO). The effects of anaesthetic concentration, fresh gas flow rate, and the hydration of absorbent or the excretion of CO2 by patients on CO production have also been investigated. This work aims to identify the most significant one of these factors on CO concentration in a low-flow anaesthesia system, without control of the hydration of the absorbents.

Methods

A simulated clinical circle anaesthetic breathing system was used to study the CO concentration under various conditions. Desflurane was used at three different concentrations. Two CO2 flow rates and three fresh gas flow rates were used. The absorbent temperatures and hydration were measured simultaneously.

Results

Desflurane degraded to produce CO in the breathing tube, when the CO2 absorbents were not dried beforehand. In this imitation clinical low-flow setting, fresh gas flow affected the CO production more than the CO2 did (31.7% vs. 9.5%). The actual desflurane partial pressure was not a significant factor. The CO2 flow rate explained 18.2% and 54.0% of the variation of the absorbent hydration changes (%) and temperature, respectively.

Conclusions

In clinical practice, the CO2 production varies among patients and is uncontrollable, but markedly affects CO production. The only controllable factor is the fresh gas flow rate if the ultimate goal is to reduce the undesirable exposure of patients to CO from the breathing tube according to this bench model without counting the oxygen consumption.

Keywords

INHALATION ANAESTHETICS, desfluraneCARBON MONOXIDEVENTILATION, fresh gas flow
Type
Original Article
Information
European Journal of Anaesthesiology , Volume 25 , Issue 8 , August 2008 , pp. 620 - 626
Copyright
Copyright © European Society of Anaesthesiology 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Fang, ZX, Eger, EI II, Laster, MJ, Chortkoff, BS, Kandel, L, Ionescu, P. Carbon monoxide production from degradation of desflurane, enflurane, isoflurane, halothane, and sevoflurane by soda lime and baralyme. Anesth Analg 1995; 80: 1187–1193.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Baxter, PJ, Garton, K, Kharasch, ED. Mechanistic aspects of carbon monoxide formation from volatile anaesthetics. Anesthesiology 1998; 89: 929–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Baxter, PJ, Kharasch, ED. Rehydration of desiccated baralyme prevents CO formation from desflurane in an anaesthesia machine. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 1061–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Knolle, E, Heinze, G, Gilly, H. CO formation in dry soda lime is prolonged at low gas flow. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 488–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Knolle, E, Heinze, G, Gilly, H. Small CO formation in absorbents does not correlate with small CO absorption. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 650–655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Stabernack, CR, Brown, R, Laster, MJ, Dudziak, R, Eger, EI II. Absorbents differ enormously in their capacity to produce compound A and CO. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 1428–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Tang, CS, Fan, SZ, Chan, CC. Smoking status and body size increase carbon monoxide concentrations in the breathing circuit during low-flow anaesthesia. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 542–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Woehlck, HJ, Connolly, LA, Cinquegrani, MP, Dunning, MB III, Hoffmann, RG. Acute smoking increases ST depression in humans during general anaesthesia. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 856–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Middleton, V, Poznak, AV, Artusion, JF, Smith, SM. Carbon monoxide accumulation in closed circle anaesthesia system. Anesthesiology 1965; 26: 715–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Woehlck, HJ, Dunning, MB III, Raza, T, Ruiz, F, Bolla, B, Zink, W. Physical factors affecting the production of carbon monoxide from anaesthetic breakdown. Anesthesiology 2001; 94: 453–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Knolle, E, Gilly, H. Absorption of carbon dioxide by dry soda lime decreases CO formation from isoflurane degradation. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 446–451.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Neumann, MA, Laster, MJ, Weiskopf, RB et al. The elimination of sodium and potassium hydroxides from desiccated soda lime diminishes degradation of desflurane to carbon monoxide and sevoflurane to compound A but does not compromise carbon monoxide absorption. Anesth Analg 1999; 89: 768–773.Google ScholarPubMed
13. Industrial Ventilation – A Manual of Recommended Practice, 21st edn. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, Committee on Industrial Ventilation, Lansing, NE, USA, 1992.Google Scholar
14.Strum, DP. Low-flow anaesthesia: anaesthetic degradation to CO and compound A. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 1995; 8: 521–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Strum, DP, Eger, EI II. The degradation, absorption and solubility of volatile anaesthetics in soda lime depend on water content. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 340–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.Holak, EJ, Mei, DA, Dunning, MB III et al. Carbon monoxide production from sevoflurane breakdown: modeling of exposure under clinical conditions. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 757–764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Murray, JM, Renfrew, CW, Bedi, A, Mccrystal, CB, Jones, DS, Howard Fee, JP. A new CO absorbent for use in anaesthetic breathing systems. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 1342–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Evan, DK, Powers, KM, Artru, AA. Comparison of Amsorb, sodalime and baralyme degradation of volatile anaesthetics and formation of CO and compound A in swine in vivo. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 173–178.Google Scholar
19.Woehlck, HJ. Severe intraoperative CO poisoning (Editorial Views). Anesthesiology 1999; 90: 353–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Woehlck, HJ, Mei, D, Dunning, MB III, Ruiz, F. Mathematical modeling of CO exposures from anesthetic breakdown. Anesthesiology 2001; 94: 457–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed