Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:32:48.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Value of oropharyngeal Mallampati classification in predicting difficult laryngoscopy among obese patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2006

G. S. Voyagis
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, Sotiria and Laikon Hospitals, Athens, Greece
K. P. Kyriakis
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, Sotiria and Laikon Hospitals, Athens, Greece
V. Dimitriou
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, Sotiria and Laikon Hospitals, Athens, Greece
I. Vrettou
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesiology, Sotiria and Laikon Hospitals, Athens, Greece
Get access

Abstract

The prediction of difficult intubation in obese patients was investigated by co-estimating the degree of visbility of oropharyngeal structures in conjunction with the respective body mass index. Data were collected prospectively in a series of 1833 consecutive adult patients. Body mass index (BMI) in kg m−2 was used as a measure of obesity (morbid: >40, moderate: 30–40, no obesity: <30). The oropharyngeal class findings were assessed using the original methodology as well as by a modification requiring the tongue to be pulled forward by the examiner. Difficult intubation was defined as inadequate exposure of the glottis by direct laryngoscopy. Both oropharyngeal class methodologies were of equal sensitivity, whereas the modified technique presented a significantly higher positive predictive value (50.0% vs. 37.2%, P<0.01). Statistical analysis revealed an increased risk of dificult laryngoscopy among obese patients compared with subjects with normal body mass index (20.2% vs. 7.6%, P<0.001). When obesity is estimated with respect to oropharyngeal class the positive predictive value is greately improved (66.7% vs. 20.2%, P<0.001). We conclude that obesity which is associated with a disproportionately large base of the tongue, is a predisposing factor for difficult laryngoscopy.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
1998 European Society of Anaesthesiology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)