Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Ethics & International Affairs
  4. Volume 31
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 31 - Winter 2017

Contents

Page 3 of 4

Reviews

Carbon Emissions, SAI, and Unintended Harms: Three Responses

  • Bringing Politics into SAI*

  • Sikina Jinnah, Douglas Bushey
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    08 December 2017, pp. 501-506

  • In order to advance a neatly deductive argument, Christopher J. Preston must make a number of assumptions and framing decisions that exclude important practical points from the scope of his analysis. We do not criticize him for doing so, as these simplifications allow him to advance a concise argument about an ethically complex subject. However, as scholars of politics and law, we are interested in what this ethical argument means—and does not mean—for the messy politics of climate engineering. Accordingly, in our response we unpack the political implications of some of Preston's assumptions and framing decisions in an effort to add a layer of practical richness to the abstraction of Preston's analysis.

Reviews

Front Cover (OFC, IFC) and matter

  • EIA volume 31 issue 1 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    10 March 2017, pp. f1-f6
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Briefly Noted

Carbon Emissions, SAI, and Unintended Harms: Three Responses

  • Calculating the Incalculable: Is SAI the Lesser of Two Evils?*

  • Mike Hulme
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    08 December 2017, pp. 507-512

  • Christopher J. Preston's use of the doctrine of double effect to claim that hypothetical climate engineers might very well be less culpable for climate harms than those who continue to emit greenhouse gases is unpersuasive. His argument rests shakily on the ability to determine and quantify climate harms and to distinguish forensically between their causes. He is also largely silent about the distributional effects of these harms and their ethical and political ramifications.

Reviews

Briefly Noted

Back Cover (IBC, OBC) and matter

  • EIA volume 31 issue 1 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    10 March 2017, pp. b1-b3
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Reviews

Front Cover (OFC, IFC) and matter

  • EIA volume 31 issue 2 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    09 June 2017, pp. f1-f6
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • EIA volume 31 issue 3 Cover and Front matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    08 September 2017, pp. f1-f6
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Reviews

Back Cover (IBC, OBC) and matter

  • EIA volume 31 issue 2 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    09 June 2017, pp. b1-b3
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • EIA volume 31 issue 3 Cover and Back matter

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    08 September 2017, pp. b1-b3
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Reviews

Page 3 of 4