Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T04:04:47.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On weak mixing, minimality and weak disjointness of all iterates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

DOMINIK KWIETNIAK  and
PIOTR OPROCHA
DOMINIK KWIETNIAK
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, Jagiellonian University, Łojasiewicza 6, 30-348 Kraków, Poland (email: [email protected])
PIOTR OPROCHA
Affiliation:
AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Applied Mathematics, al. A. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, Poland Institute of Mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Śniadeckich 8, 00-956 Warszawa, Poland (email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article addresses some open questions about the relations between the topological weak mixing property and the transitivity of the map f×f2×⋯×fm, where f:X→X is a topological dynamical system on a compact metric space. The theorem stating that a weakly mixing and strongly transitive system is Δ-transitive is extended to a non-invertible case with a simple proof. Two examples are constructed, answering the questions posed by Moothathu [Diagonal points having dense orbit. Colloq. Math. 120(1) (2010), 127–138]. The first one is a multi-transitive non-weakly mixing system, and the second one is a weakly mixing non-multi-transitive system. The examples are special spacing shifts. The latter shows that the assumption of minimality in the multiple recurrence theorem cannot be replaced by weak mixing.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 32 , Issue 5 , October 2012 , pp. 1661 - 1672
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Auslander, J.. Minimal Flows and Their Extensions (North-Holland Mathematics Studies, 153). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988.Google Scholar
[2]Auslander, J. and Markley, N.. Graphic flows and multiple disjointness. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 292(2) (1985), 483–499.Google Scholar
[3]Auslander, J. and Markley, N.. Isomorphism classes of products of powers for graphic flows. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 17(2) (1997), 297–305.Google Scholar
[4]Banks, J., Nguyen, T. T. D., Oprocha, P. and Trotta, B.. Dynamics of spacing shifts. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., Preprint, 2009, to appear.Google Scholar
[5]Blanchard, F., Glasner, E. and Kwiatkowski, J.. Minimal self-joinings and positive topological entropy. Monatsh. Math. 120(3–4) (1995), 205–222.Google Scholar
[6]Blanchard, F. and Kwiatkowski, J.. Minimal self-joinings and positive topological entropy. II. Studia Math. 128(2) (1998), 121–133.Google Scholar
[7]Chacon, R. V.. Weakly mixing transformations which are not strongly mixing. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 22 (1969), 559–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Furstenberg, H.. Disjointness in ergodic theory, minimal sets, and a problem in Diophantine approximation. Math. Syst. Theory 1 (1967), 1–49.Google Scholar
[9]Furstenberg, H., Keynes, H. and Shapiro, L.. Prime flows in topological dynamics. Israel J. Math. 14 (1973), 26–38.Google Scholar
[10]Glasner, E.. Classifying dynamical systems by their recurrence properties. Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal. 24(1) (2004), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Glasner, E.. Structure Theory as a Tool in Topological Dynamics (London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 277). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000, pp. 173–209.Google Scholar
[12]Glasner, E.. Ergodic Theory via Joinings (Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 101). American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2003.Google Scholar
[13]Huang, W. and Ye, X.. Topological complexity, return times and weak disjointness. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 24 (2004), 825–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Huang, W. and Ye, X.. An explicit scattering, non-weakly mixing example and weak disjointness. Nonlinearity 15 (2002), 849–862.Google Scholar
[15]del Junco, A.. A family of counterexamples in ergodic theory. Israel J. Math. 44(2) (1983), 160–188.Google Scholar
[16]del Junco, A., Rahe, M. and Swanson, L.. Chacon’s automorphism has minimal self-joinings. J. Anal. Math. 37 (1980), 276–284.Google Scholar
[17]del Junco, A.. On minimal self-joinings in topological dynamics. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 7(2) (1987), 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]King, J.. A map with topological minimal self-joinings in the sense of del Junco. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 10(4) (1990), 745–761.Google Scholar
[19]Kolyada, S., Snoha, L. and Trofimchuk, S.. Noninvertible minimal maps. Fund. Math. 168 (2001), 141–163.Google Scholar
[20]Lau, K. and Zame, A.. On weak mixing of cascades. Math. Syst. Theory 6 (1972/73), 307–311.Google Scholar
[21]Markley, N.. Topological minimal self-joinings. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 3(4) (1983), 579–599.Google Scholar
[22]Moothathu, T. K. S.. Diagonal points having dense orbit. Colloq. Math. 120(1) (2010), 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23]Rudolph, D.. An example of a measure preserving map with minimal self-joinings, and applications. J. Anal. Math. 35 (1979), 97–122.Google Scholar