Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T04:30:29.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Actions of lattices in Sp (1, n)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2008

Michael Cowling  and
Robert J. Zimmer
Michael Cowling
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia
Robert J. Zimmer
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Chicago, 5734 University Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We study questions concerning the ergodic theory, von Neumann algebras, geometry, and topology of actions of lattices in Sp (1, n).

Type
Research Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 1989 , pp. 221 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

References

REFERENCES

[1]Connes, A., Feldman, J. & Weiss, B.. An amenable equivalence relation is generated by a single transformation. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 1 (1981), 431–450.Google Scholar
[2]Connes, A. & Jones, V.. A II 1-factor with two non-conjugate Cartan subalgebras. Bull. A.M.S. 6 (1982) 211–212.Google Scholar
[3]de Canniere, J. & Haagerup, U.. Multipliers of the Fourier algebra of some simple Lie groups and their discrete subgroups. Amer. J. Math. 107 (1984), 455–500.Google Scholar
[4]Cowling, M. & Haagerup, U.. Completely bounded multipliers of the Fourier algebra of a simple Lie group of real rank one. Preprint.Google Scholar
[5]Dye, H.. On groups of measure preserving transformations. Amer. J. Math. 81 (1959), 119–159.Google Scholar
[6]Feldman, J. & Moore, C. C.. Ergodic equivalence relations, cohomology, and von Neumann algebras, II. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 234 (1977), 325–359.Google Scholar
[7]Gromov, M.. Rigid transformation groups. To appear.Google Scholar
[8]Haagerup, U.. Group C*-algebras without the completely bounded approximation property. Preprint.Google Scholar
[9]Kobayashi, S.. Transformation Groups in Differential Geometry (Springer: New York, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Packer, J.. On the embedding of subalgebras corresponding to quotient actions in group measure space factors. Preprint.Google Scholar
[11]Palais, R.. On the existence of slices for actions of non-compact Lie groups. Ann. Math. 73 (1961), 295–323.Google Scholar
[12]Zimmer, R. J.. Strong rigidity for ergodic actions of semisimple Lie groups. Ann. Math. 112 (1980), 511–529.Google Scholar
[13]Zimmer, R. J.. On the cohomology of ergodic actions of semisimple Lie groups and discrete subgroups. Amer. J. Math. 103 (1981), 937–950.Google Scholar
[14]Zimmer, R. J.. Ergodic Theory and Semisimple Groups (Birkhauser: Boston, 1984).Google Scholar
[15]Zimmer, R. J.. Ergodic theory and the automorphism group of a G-structure, in Moore, C. C., ed., Group Representations, Ergodic Theory, Operator Algebras, and Mathematical Physics (Springer: New York, 1987) 247–278.Google Scholar
[16]Zimmer, R. J.. Lattices in semisimple groups and invariant geometric structures on compact manifolds, Howe, R., ed., Discrete Groups in Geometry and Analysis (Birkhauser: Boston, 1987) 152–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Zimmer, R. J.. Actions of lattices in semisimple groups preserving a geometric structure of finite type. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 5 (1985), 301–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Zimmer, R. J.. Kazhdan groups acting on compact manifolds. Invent. Math. 75 (1984), 425–436.Google Scholar
[19]Zimmer, R. J.. Representations of fundamental groups of manifolds with a semisimple transformation group. J. Amer. Math. Soc, to appear.Google Scholar