Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T04:08:33.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mixing for stationary processes with finite-order multiple Wiener-Itô integral representation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2010

Eric Slud
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
Daniel Chambers
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167-3806, USA

Abstract

Necessary and sufficient analytical conditions are given for homogeneous multiple Wiener-Itô integral processes (MWIs) to be mixing, and sufficient conditions are given for mixing of general square-integrable Gaussian-subordinated processes. It is shown that every finite or infinite sum Y of MWIs (i.e. every real square-integrable stationary polynomial form in the variables of an underlying weakly mixing Gaussian process) is mixing if the process defined separately by each homogeneous-order term is mixing, and that this condition is necessary for a large class of Gaussian-subordinated processes. Moreover, for homogeneous MWIs Y1, for sums of MWIs of order ≤ 3, and for a large class of square-integrable infinite sums Y1, of MWIs, mixing holds if and only if Y2 has correlation-function decaying to zero for large lags. Several examples of the criteria for mixing are given, including a second-order homogeneous MWI, i.e. a degree two polynomial form, orthogonal to all linear forms, which has auto-correlations tending to zero for large lags but is not mixing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Chambers, D.. Necessary and sufficient conditions for a second-order multiple Wiener-Itô integral to be mixing. Stock. Proc. & Appls. 45 (1993), 183–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Cornfeld, I., Fomin, S. and Sinai, Ya.. Ergodic Theory. Springer, New York, 1984.Google Scholar
[3]Itô, K.. Multiple Wiener integral. J. Math. Soc. Japan 3 (1951), 157–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Itô, K.. Complex multiple Wiener integral. Jap. J. Math. 22 (1952), 6386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Kallenberg, O.. On an independence criterion for multiple Wiener integrals. Ann. Probab. 19 (1991), 483–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Major, P.. Multiple Wiener-Ito integrals. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 849. Springer, New York, 1981.Google Scholar
[7]Maruyama, G.. The harmonic analysis of stationary stochastic processes. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ. A4 (1949), 45106.Google Scholar
[8]Rudin, W.. Fourier Analysis on Groups. Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
[9]Slud, E.. The moment problem for polynomial forms in normal random variables. Ann. Prob. 21 (1993), 22002214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Üstünel, A. S. and Zakai, M.. On independence and conditioning on Wiener space. Ann. Prob. 17 (1989), 1441–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Veršik, A.. On the theory of normal dynamical systems. Doklady Acad. Sci. USSR 144 (1962), 912; On the spectral and metric isomorphism of some normal dynamical systems. Doklady Acad. Sci. USSR 144 (1962), 255–7.Google Scholar