Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:56:04.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Approximate equivalence of group actions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2017

ANDREAS NÆS AASERUD  and
SORIN POPA
ANDREAS NÆS AASERUD
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1555, USA email [email protected], [email protected]
SORIN POPA
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1555, USA email [email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We consider several weaker versions of the notion of conjugacy and orbit equivalence of measure preserving actions of countable groups on probability spaces, involving equivalence of the ultrapower actions and asymptotic intertwining conditions. We compare them with the other existing equivalence relations between group actions, and study the usual type of rigidity questions around these new concepts (superrigidity, calculation of invariants, etc).

Type
Original Article
Information
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , June 2018 , pp. 1201 - 1237
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abert, M. and Elek, G.. Dynamical properties of profinite actions. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 32 (2012), 1805–1835.Google Scholar
Abert, M. and Weiss, B.. Bernoulli actions are weakly contained in any free action. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 33 (2013), 323–333.Google Scholar
Anantharaman-Delaroche, C.. On Connes’s property (T) for von Neumann algebras. Math. Japon. 32 (1987), 337–355.Google Scholar
Boca, F.. On a method for constructing irreducible finite index subfactors of Popa. Pacific J. Math. 161 (1993), 201–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, L.. Measure conjugacy invariants for actions of countable sofic groups. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 23 (2010), 217–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, L.. Weak density of orbit equivalence classes of free group actions. Groups Geom. Dyn. 9(03) (2015), 811–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, L., Hoff, D. and Ioana, A.. von Neumann’s problem and extensions of non-amenable equivalence relations. Preprint, 2015, arXiv:1509.01723.Google Scholar
Chifan, I. and Kida, Y.. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 111(6) (2015), 1431–1470.Google Scholar
Conley, C., Kechris, A. and Tucker-Drob, R.. Ultraproducts of measure preserving actions and graph combinatorics. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 33 (2013), 334–374.Google Scholar
Connes, A.. Almost periodic states and factors of type III 1 . J. Funct. Anal. 16 (1974), 415–445.Google Scholar
Connes, A.. Classification of injective factors. Ann. of Math. (2) 104 (1976), 73–115.Google Scholar
Connes, A., Feldman, J. and Weiss, B.. An amenable equivalence relation is generated by a single transformation. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 1 (1981), 431–450.Google Scholar
Connes, A. and Jones, V. F. R.. A II 1 factor with two non-conjugate Cartan subalgebras. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 6 (1982), 211–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connes, A. and Weiss, B.. Property (T) and asymptotically invariant sequences. Israel J. Math. 37 (1980), 209–210.Google Scholar
Dixmier, J.. Sous-anneaux abéliens maximaux dans les facteurs de type fini. Ann. of Math. (2) 59 (1954), 279–286.Google Scholar
Dye, H.. On groups of measure preserving transformations I. Amer. J. Math. 81 (1959), 119–159.Google Scholar
Epstein, I.. Orbit inequivalent actions of non-amenable groups. Preprint, 2007, arXiv:0707.4215.Google Scholar
Elek, G. and Lippner, G.. Sofic equivalence relations. J. Funct. Anal. 258 (2010), 1692–1708.Google Scholar
Feldman, J. and Moore, C. C.. Ergodic equivalence relations, cohomology, and von Neumann algebras I. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 234 (1977), 289–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, J. and Moore, C. C.. Ergodic equivalence relations, cohomology, and von Neumann algebras II. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 234 (1977), 325–359.Google Scholar
Furman, A.. Orbit equivalence rigidity. Ann. of Math. (2) 150 (1999), 1083–1108.Google Scholar
Furman, A.. Outer automorphism group of some equivalence relations. Comment. Math. Helv. 80 (2005), 157–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaboriau, D.. Cout des rélations d’équivalence et des groupes. Invent. Math. 139 (2000), 41–98.Google Scholar
Gaboriau, D.. Invariants ℓ 2 de rélations d’équivalence et de groupes. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 95 (2002), 93–150.Google Scholar
Gaboriau, D. and Lyons, R.. A measurable-group-theoretic solution to von Neumann’s problem. Invent. Math. 177 (2009), 533–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaboriau, D. and Popa, S.. An uncountable family of nonorbit equivalent actions of F n . J. Amer. Math. Soc. 18(3) (2005), 547–559.Google Scholar
Gefter, S. L.. On cohomologies of ergodic actions of a T-group on homogeneous spaces of a compact Lie group. Operators in Functional Spaces and Questions of Function Theory. Collected Science Works, Kiev, 1987, pp. 77–83 (in Russian).Google Scholar
Hjorth, G.. A converse to Dye’s theorem. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 357 (2005), 3083–3103.Google Scholar
Houdayer, C.. Invariant percolation and measured theory of nonamenable groups (after Gaboriau-Lyons, Ioana, Epstein). Séminaire Bourbaki, Vol. 2010/2011, Exp. No. 1039. Astérisque 348 (2012), 339–374.Google Scholar
Ioana, A.. Cocycle superrigidity for profinite actions of property (T) groups. Duke Math J. 157 (2011), 337–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioana, A.. Orbit inequivalent actions for groups containing a copy of F2 . Invent. Math. 185 (2011), 55–73.Google Scholar
Ioana, A.. Classification and rigidity for von Neumann algebras. Proceedings of the 6th European Congress of Mathematics (Krakow, 2012). EMS Publishing House, 2014, pp. 601–625.Google Scholar
Ioana, A., Peterson, J. and Popa, S.. Amalgamated free products of weakly rigid factors and calculation of their symmetry groups. Acta Math. 200(1) (2008), 85–153.Google Scholar
Ioana, A. and Tucker-Drob, R.. Weak containment rigidity for distal actions. Preprint,arXiv:1507.05357.Google Scholar
Kechris, A.. Global Aspects of Ergodic Group Actions (Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 160) . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010.Google Scholar
Kida, Y.. Orbit equivalence rigidity for ergodic actions of the mapping class group. Geom. Dedicatae 131 (2008), 99–109.Google Scholar
Kida, Y.. Rigidity of amalgamated free products in measure equivalence. J. Topol. 4 (2011), 687–735.Google Scholar
Levitt, G.. On the cost of generating an equivalence relation. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 15 (1995), 1173–1181.Google Scholar
Lück, W.. The type of the classifying space for a family of subgroups. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 149 (2000), 177–203.Google Scholar
Monod, N. and Shalom, Y.. Orbit equivalence rigidity and bounded cohomology. Ann. of Math. (2) 164 (2006), 825–878.Google Scholar
Murray, F. and von Neumann, J.. On rings of operators. Ann. of Math. (2) 37 (1936), 116–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ornstein, D. and Weiss, B.. Ergodic theory of amenable group actions I. The Rohlin Lemma. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 2 (1980), 161–164.Google Scholar
Ornstein, D. and Weiss, B.. Entropy and isomorphism theorems for actions of amenable groups. J. Anal. Math. 48 (1987), 1–143.Google Scholar
Ozawa, N. and Popa, S.. On a class of II1 factors with at most one Cartan subalgebra. Ann. of Math. (2) 172 (2010), 713–749.Google Scholar
Pimsner, M. and Popa, S.. Entropy and index for subfactors. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 19 (1986), 57–106.Google Scholar
Popa, S.. Maximal injective subalgebras in factors associated with free groups. Adv. Math. 50 (1983), 27–48.Google Scholar
Popa, S.. Notes on Cartan subalgebras in type II1 factors. Math. Scand. 57 (1985), 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popa, S.. Correspondences. INCREST Preprint, 56/1986.Google Scholar
Popa, S.. Some properties of the symmetric enveloping algebras with applications to amenability and property T. Doc. Math. 4 (1999), 665–744.Google Scholar
Popa, S.. On a class of type II1 factors with Betti numbers invariants. Ann. of Math. (2) 163 (2006), 809–899.Google Scholar
Popa, S.. Some computations of 1-cohomology groups and construction of non-orbit-equivalent actions. J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 5 (2006), 309–332.Google Scholar
Popa, S.. Strong rigidity of II1 factors arising from malleable actions of w-rigid groups I. Invent. Math. 165 (2006), 369–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popa, S.. Strong rigidity of II1 factors arising from malleable actions of w-rigid groups II. Invent. Math. 165 (2006), 409–453.Google Scholar
Popa, S.. Cocycle and orbit equivalence superrigidity for malleable actions of w-rigid groups. Invent. Math. 170 (2007), 243–295.Google Scholar
Popa, S.. Deformation and rigidity for group actions and von Neumann algebras. Proc. Int. Congr. Mathematicians (Madrid, 2006), Vol. I. EMS Publishing, Zürich, 2006/2007, pp. 445–479.Google Scholar
Popa, S.. On the superrigidity of malleable actions with spectral gap. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 21 (2008), 981–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popa, S.. A II1 factor approach to the Kadison–Singer problem. Comm. Math. Physics 332 (2014), 379–414.Google Scholar
Popa, S.. Independence properties in subalgebras of ultraproduct II1 factors. J. Funct. Anal. 266 (2014), 5818–5846.Google Scholar
Popa, S. and Sasyk, R.. On the cohomology of Bernoulli actions. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 27 (2007), 241–251.Google Scholar
Popa, S., Shlyakhtenko, D. and Vaes, S.. Cohomology and $L^{2}$ -Betti numbers for subfactors and quasi-regular inclusions. Preprint, 2003, arXiv:1511.07329.Google Scholar
Popa, S. and Vaes, S.. On the fundamental group of II1 factors and equivalence relations arising from group actions. Non-Commutative Geometry (Proc. Conf. in Honor of Alain Connes’s 60th Birthday, 2–6 April 2007). IHP, Paris, 2007.Google Scholar
Schmidt, K.. Asymptotically invariant sequences and an action of SL(2, ℤ) on the 2-sphere. Israel J. Math. 37 (1980), 193–208.Google Scholar
Schmidt, K.. Amenability, Kazhdan’s property T, strong ergodicity and invariant means for ergodic group-actions. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 1 (1981), 223–236.Google Scholar
Singer, I. M.. Automorphisms of finite factors. Amer. J. Math. 177 (1955), 117–133.Google Scholar
Tucker-Drob, R.. Weak equivalence and non-classifiability of measure preserving actions. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 35 (2015), 293–336.Google Scholar
Vaes, S.. Rigidity results for Bernoulli actions and their von Neumann algebras (after Sorin Popa) Séminaire Bourbaki, Exp. No. 961. Astérisque 311 (2007), 237–294.Google Scholar
Vaes, S.. Rigidity for von Neumann algebras and their invariants. Proceedings of the ICM 2010, Vol. III. Hindustan Book Agency, Gurgaon, India, 2010, pp. 1624–1650.Google Scholar
Wright, F.. Reduction for algebras of finite type. Ann. of Math. (2) 60(1954) 560–570.Google Scholar
Zimmer, R.. Strong rigidity for ergodic actions of semisimple Lie groups. Ann. of Math. (2) 112(1980) 511–529.Google Scholar