Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:20:21.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Should we ignore SARS-CoV-2 disease?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2024

Igor Nesteruk*
Affiliation:
Institute of Hydromechanics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
*
Corresponding author: Igor Nesteruk; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Current World Health Organization (WHO) reports claim a decline in COVID-19 testing and reporting of new infections. To discuss the consequences of ignoring severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, the endemic characteristics of the disease in 2023 with the ones estimated before using 2022 data sets are compared. The accumulated numbers of cases and deaths reported to the WHO by the 10 most infected countries and global figures were used to calculate the average daily numbers of cases DCC and deaths DDC per capita and case fatality rates (CFRs = DDC/DCC) for two periods in 2023. In some countries, the DDC values can be higher than the upper 2022 limit and exceed the seasonal influenza mortality. The increase in CFR in 2023 shows that SARS-CoV-2 infection is still dangerous. The numbers of COVID-19 cases and deaths per capita in 2022 and 2023 do not demonstrate downward trends with the increase in the percentages of fully vaccinated people and boosters. The reasons may be both rapid mutations of the coronavirus, which reduced the effectiveness of vaccines and led to a large number of re-infections, and inappropriate management.

Type
Original Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

The high numbers of circulating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants [13] and re-infected people [4Reference Flacco6], the lack of decreasing trends in the global numbers of deaths [7], and the expected very long duration of the Omicron wave [Reference Nesteruk8] caused an assumption that the pathogen will circulate forever, which was supported by a mathematical model [Reference Nesteruk9]. Some endemic characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 disease were estimated in [Reference Nesteruk9] with the use of global accumulated numbers of COVID-19 cases V and deaths D, registered in [10] from 1 January 2022 to 6 December 2022.

In this study, we will try to check the estimations presented in [Reference Nesteruk9] with the use of data reported by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2023 [7]. Unfortunately, currently ‘reported cases do not accurately represent infection rates due to the reduction in testing and reporting globally’ [11]. In particular, in the period from 31 July to 27 August 2023, only 39% of countries reported at least one case [11]. Of the 10 countries with the highest figures of accumulated COVID-19 cases, only four (Italy, the UK, India, and China) have reported new cases during the last 28 days of 2023 [7]. Nevertheless, we will try to analyse recent trends for average daily numbers of cases DCC and deaths DDC per million and the case fatality risk (CFR), and the influence of vaccination levels (the percentages of fully vaccinated people VC and boosters BC listed in [10]).

Materials and methods

We will use the accumulated numbers of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases Vi and deaths Di for 10 countries with the highest figures and the world (i = 1, 2, …, 11) listed by the WHO [7] (version of file updated on 14 September 2023). Chinese figures include Mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macao. $ {V}_i^{(1)} $ , $ {V}_i^{(2)} $ , and $ {V}_i^{(3)} $ correspond to the numbers of cases accumulated on 31 December 2022, 15 May 2023, and 10 September 2023, respectively. $ {D}_i^{(1)} $ , $ {D}_i^{(2)} $ , and $ {D}_i^{(3)} $ correspond to the accumulated numbers of deaths (see Table 1). The populations Ni of regions (as of 14 September 2023 [12]) are also listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Accumulated numbers of COVID-19 cases and deaths and population volumes in 2023

To calculate the average daily characteristics of DCC and DDC, we will use two periods, 1 January–10 September 2023 (T1 = 253 days) and 16 May–10 September 2023 (T2 = 119 days), and simple formulas:

(1) $$ {DCC}_i^{(j)}=\frac{V_i^{(3)}-{V}_i^{(j)}}{N_i{T}_j};\hskip1.12em i=1,2,\dots, 11;\hskip1em j=1,2 $$
(2) $$ {DDC}_i^{(j)}=\frac{D_i^{(3)}-{D}_i^{(j)}}{N_i{T}_j};\hskip1.12em i=1,2,\dots, 11;\hskip1em j=1,2 $$

The CFR values corresponding to the same periods can be calculated as follows:

(3) $$ {CFR}_i^{(j)}=\frac{D_i^{(3)}-{D}_i^{(j)}}{V_i^{(3)}-{V}_i^{(j)}};\hskip1.12em i=1,2,\dots, 11;\hskip1em j=1,2 $$

Results and discussion

The results of calculations are presented in Table 2 and Figure 1. Blue, black, and red markers correspond to the values of DCC, DDC, and CFR, respectively. The characteristics, corresponding to the long period (1 January–10 September 2023; T1 = 253 days), are shown by ‘circles’; to the short period (16 May–10 September 2023; T2 = 119 days), by ‘crosses’; and to the last 28 days of 2023, by ‘triangles’. Zero values and cases when CFR cannot be calculated are not shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Results of calculations (markers) of the average daily numbers of cases DCC (blue) and deaths DDC (black) per million and case fatality risks (CFRs) (red) for three different periods in 2023 and comparison with the values estimated in [Reference Nesteruk9] (dashed lines) and flu mortality (dotted magenta lines). The characteristics, corresponding to the long period (1 January–10 September 2023; T1 = 253 days), are shown by ‘circles’; to the short period (16 May–10 September 2023; T2 = 119 days), by ‘crosses’; and to the last 28 days of 2023, by ‘triangles’.

According to the endemic characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 disease estimated in [Reference Nesteruk9] with the use of V and D values, registered in [10] from 1 January 2022 to 6 December 2022, the global numbers of new daily cases will range between 300 thousand and one million and daily deaths between one and 3.3 thousand. Dividing these values by the world population of 8,060.5 million [12], we can calculate lower and upper limits per capita: for the global average number of daily cases per million, DCC* = 37.2 and DCC** = 124.1, and for the global average number of COVID-19-related deaths per million, DDC* = 0.124 and DDC** = 0.409. The global value of case fatality risk CFR* = 0.0033 for the period from 1 January 2022 to 6 December 2022 [Reference Nesteruk9]. These values are represented by dashed lines: blue for DCC* and DCC**, black for DDC* and DDC**, and red for CFR*. For comparison, the dotted magenta lines represent the limits DDC*(flu) = 0.1 and DDC**(flu) = 0.18 for the global average daily number of deaths per million related to the seasonal flu calculated in [Reference Nesteruk13] using the figures registered in 2002–2011 [Reference Paget14].

It can be seen that the average values of new daily cases per capita corresponding to the long period ( $ {DCC}_i^{(1)} $ , blue ‘circles’) are mostly close to the estimation DCC* = 37.2 (the lower blue line). The value $ {DCC}_8^{(1)} $ corresponding to Japan is slightly higher than DCC** = 124.1. In 2023, South Korea registered much more cases than the global average value in 2022 (compare the corresponding blue ‘circle’ and ‘cross’ with the upper blue line). This country applied a zero-COVID strategy that ‘involves using public health measures such as contact tracing, mass testing, border quarantine, lockdowns, and mitigation software in order to stop community transmission of COVID-19 as soon as it is detected’ [15]. Due to this, the zero-COVID countries have registered much more cases per capita CC and achieved much lower numbers of deaths per capita DC and CFR values in comparison with other countries and regions [Reference Nesteruk and Keeling16].

The average daily numbers of cases per capita corresponding to the short period are zero for the USA, China, and Japan (not shown in Figure 1) or much lower than the estimation DCC* = 37.2 (compare blue ‘crosses’ and the lower blue line). There are two possible reasons for this result. As mentioned below, more and more countries have reduced testing and stopped updating the COVID-19 statistics [10, 11]. On the other hand, the short period corresponds to the summer time in the most infected countries. During the winter period (the last 28 days of 2023), only Italy, the UK, India, and China have reported new cases (175.9 K, 35.8 K, 11 K, and 1.9 K, respectively, with the global figure 1,189,927 [7]). Dividing these values by 28 and the volumes of populations listed in Table 1, we can obtain the corresponding average daily numbers of new cases per million DCC = 106.8, 18.9, 0.27, and 0.048, respectively, with the global figure 5.3 (see blue ‘triangles’). The Italian figure 106.8 approaches the upper limit DCC** = 124.1 and shows that new severe COVID-19 pandemic waves are still possible.

Very low numbers of cases and deaths per capita registered in India look like exclusion (compare the corresponding blue and black ‘circles’, ‘crosses’, and ‘triangles’ with the blue and black lines) connected with the low testing level typical for low-income countries (see [Reference Nesteruk and Rodionov17]). The ratio of the number of tests to the number of cases DTS will allow us to understand the situation. High DTS values mean that many people surrounding the detected infectious patient (e.g. family members, colleagues, neighbours) were tested and isolated (this causes a decrease in the number of new infections, i.e. DCC). For example, very high tests per case ratios (DTS > 100) in Hong Kong in 2020 and 2021 allowed controlling the COVID-19 epidemic completely [Reference Nesteruk18] (the smoothed daily numbers of new cases per million were less than 20 [10]). The average daily test per case ratio increases for countries with low DCC figures [Reference Nesteruk13]. For example, DTS values in 2022 were equal to 26.9 (the UK), 39.4 (India), 4.3 (South Korea), and 1.95 (Japan) and demonstrate that the probability of missing an infectious person due to the lack of tests is much higher in Japan or South Korea than in India [Reference Nesteruk13]. During the severe pandemic wave in Japan in the summer of 2022, the testing levels probably were not enough to confirm COVID-19 in all patients with symptoms [Reference Nesteruk19].

Very low DCC and DDC values registered in India could be the result of large numbers of asymptomatic undetected cases. The ratio of real and registered cases (visibility coefficient $ \beta $ ) could be rather high due to large numbers of asymptomatic COVID-19 patients [Reference Fowlkes20] and avoiding testing by infectious people with moderate symptoms. An experimental estimation of the visibility coefficient $ \beta \approx 2.63 $ was obtained in [Reference Nesteruk21] from the results of total testing in Slovakia on 31 October–7 November 2020 [22]. The generalized susceptible–infected–removed (SIR) model and algorithms of their parameter identification [Reference Nesteruk19, Reference Nesteruk21] yielded theoretical $ \beta $ values from 3.7 to 20.4 for Ukraine [Reference Nesteruk21, Reference Nesteruk23] and 5.4 for Qatar [Reference Nesteruk24] in different periods of the pandemic. The rapid decrease in DCC values in 2023 (see Table 2 or compare blue ‘circles’ and ‘crosses’) illustrates the increase in visibility coefficients due to the sharp reduction in the public interest in SARS-CoV-2 infection and testing levels. In particular, the huge growth of $ \beta $ values makes control of endemic characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infection [Reference Nesteruk9] impossible. The lack of appropriate testing did not allow proper detection of the first cases [Reference Nesteruk25, Reference Weinberger26], which probably appeared in August 2019 [Reference Nesteruk25].

Table 2. Results of calculations of the average daily numbers of cases and deaths and case fatality rates for two different periods in 2023

Assuming that the visibility coefficients are proportional to the fraction of asymptomatic patients, which is much higher in children [Reference Fowlkes20], and that younger populations have fewer clinical cases per capita [Reference Davies27], the population age was taken into account in the statistical studies [Reference Nesteruk13, Reference Nesteruk and Keeling16]. Rather strong correlations between the median age A and DCC and DDC values registered in 2022 and 2023 in 31 countries and regions were revealed in [Reference Nesteruk13] (a similar strong trend for CC and DC values vs. A was demonstrated in [Reference Nesteruk and Keeling16]). One-year increment in the median age yields the average increase in DCC values by 39.8 in 2022 and by 5.8 in 2023 (for DDC values by 0.0799 in 2022 and by 0.0263 in 2023) [Reference Nesteruk13]. For example, taking into account the median age difference (A = 28.7 in India and 30.5 for the world [28, 29]), we can calculate the differences in DCC (10.4) and DDC (0.0473) expected in 2023. These values are located between corresponding differences for the short and long periods of 2023 (see Table 2). Thus, much lower numbers of COVID-19 cases and deaths per capita registered in India or Africa [7, 10, Reference Nesteruk13, Reference Nesteruk and Keeling16, Reference Nesteruk and Rodionov17, Reference Nesteruk30] are a result of the huge amount of asymptomatic (and unrevealed) infections due to the younger populations.

It can be seen that average values of daily deaths per capita corresponding to the long period ( $ {DDC}_i^{(1)} $ , black ‘circles’) are mostly located between the limits DDC* and DCC** (black lines). It means that these estimations (obtained in [Reference Nesteruk9] with the use of 2022 data sets) still correspond to the real number of deaths. Zero or much lower numbers of deaths during the short period ( $ {DDC}_i^{(2)} $ , black ‘crosses’) probably reflect the reduction in testing and a seasonal decrease in mortality. During the winter period (the last 28 days of 2023), only the USA, Italy, India, and China have reported the new COVID-19-related deaths (5.2 K, 1 K, 61, and 8, respectively, with the global figure 9,575 [7]). Then, DDC values were equal to 0.55, 0.61, 0.0015, and 0.0002, respectively, with the global figure 0.042 (see black ‘triangles’). The US and Italian figures significantly exceed the upper limits of DDC** = 0.409 for COVID-19 in 2022 and DDC**(flu) = 0.18 for the global average flu mortality. The mortality related to the flu and pneumonia is much lower in these countries (age-standardized average daily numbers of deaths per million ( ASDDC ) can be estimated as 0.24 and 0.17, respectively [31]). ASDDC values for China, Japan, the UK, and South Korea vary from 0.31 to 0.69 [31] and are lower than DDC(1) figures only in Korea and China (see Table 2). The ASDDC value for India (0.97) is much higher than COVID-19-related mortality, probably due to the difference in age distributions (neglected in DDC calculations).

Since the USA has reported only the number of deaths during the last 28 days of 2023, we have calculated the corresponding CFR values only for Italy (0.0057), India (0.0055), China (0.0042), and the global figure (0.0080) (see red ‘triangles’). Much higher CFRs in 2023 (compare red markers with the red line corresponding to 2022; South Korea is only one exception) show that SARS-CoV-2 infection is still dangerous despite increasing vaccination level (more than 13.5 billion doses have been administered as of 31 August 2023 [11]). In different periods of the pandemic, CFR demonstrated decreasing trends with the increase in VC and BC [Reference Nesteruk13, Reference Nesteruk and Rodionov17, Reference Nesteruk and Rodionov32, Reference Nesteruk and Rodionov33].

To remove the age structure influence, current age-standardized CFR (ASCFR) values for the COVID-19 pandemic can be calculated and compared with the ones corresponding to 2022. For the period before 6 April 2021, ASCFR values in the UK, South Korea, Japan, the USA, Italy, and Germany were 2–3 times higher than non-standardized CFR values [Reference Hong34]. In 2022 and 2023, CFR unexpectedly demonstrated decreasing trends with the increase in the median age of population [Reference Nesteruk and Keeling16]. Since CFR is the probability to die for a person tested positive, it depends not only on the individual state of health and immunity (related to age and vaccinations) but also to a large extent on the speed and quality of medical care, which are better in countries with higher incomes (and older populations). As of 1 August 2022, the DC and CFR values decreased for richer European countries [Reference Nesteruk and Rodionov17]. Probably, the better medical care and higher vaccination level in high-income countries help reduce CFR despite older populations.

In 2023, the higher CFR values can also be a result of reduction in testing levels. Non-linear correlation demonstrated that the CFR drastically increased at low numbers of tests per capita even in 2022 [Reference Nesteruk13]. In 2023, when people paid attention to severe cases only and make tests correspondingly, CFR values can increase (reducing the denominator in formula (3) can be much larger than reducing the nominator). Therefore, one should probably not be afraid of a significant increase in CFR in 2023.

Of much greater concern is the fact that COVID-19 mortality is still high and calls into question of the effectiveness of vaccinations. Probably, the rapid mutations of coronavirus [13] reduce the effectiveness of vaccines and cause high numbers of re-infections [4Reference Flacco6]. The trends for DCC and DDC values and/or corresponding accumulated numbers of cases CC and deaths DC per capita versus percentages of vaccinations VC and boosters BC were investigated for different periods of the COVID-19 pandemic (see examples in [Reference Nesteruk13, Reference Nesteruk and Rodionov17Reference Nesteruk19, Reference Nesteruk23, Reference Nesteruk and Rodionov32, Reference Nesteruk and Rodionov33, Reference Nesteruk and Rodionov35] and Table 3). In 2021 and 2022, severe pandemic waves (with very high DCC and DDC numbers) occurred in Israel, Japan, Hong Kong, and other countries with high vaccination levels (see lines 1, 2, 5, and 10 in Table 3 and [Reference Nesteruk18, Reference Nesteruk19, Reference Nesteruk23, Reference Nesteruk and Rodionov33, Reference Nesteruk and Rodionov35]). With the use of non-linear correlation, very strong growing trends with the increase in VC were revealed for CC and DC values accumulated in all European and African countries from the pandemic outbreak until 1 August 2022 [Reference Nesteruk and Rodionov17]. The same trends demonstrate DCC and DDC calculated in [Reference Nesteruk13] for 2022 and the period from 1 January 2023 to 10 September 2023 using Johns Hopkins University (JHU) data sets [10] for 34 countries and regions. At the confidence level of 0.01, one-per cent increment of VC causes the average of 13.3 increase in DCC in 2022 and 2.7 in 2023; the increases in DDC are 0.026 and 0.011, respectively; and one-per cent increment of BC causes the average of 14.7 increase in DCC in 2022 and 1.7 in 2023; the increases in DDC are 0.025 and 0.0068, respectively [Reference Nesteruk13]. Since percentages of vaccinations increase with the growth of the population age, the corrected variations of VC and BC were considered [Reference Nesteruk13]. Nevertheless, no decreasing trends for DCC and DDC values versus corrected variations were revealed. However, only further statistical and comparative studies can definitively put an end to the very important question of vaccination effectiveness during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Table 3. Trends for accumulated cases (CC) and deaths (DC) per capita and average daily new cases (DCC) and deaths (DDC) per capita vs. percentages of fully vaccinated people (VC) and boosters (BC) in different periods of the COVID-19 pandemic

Improper organizational measures may also have contributed to the failure of the vaccination campaign. Many vaccinated people in countries with high VC and BC values were allowed to visit crowded places and travel despite they could spread the infection. Overcrowding in hospitals during vaccinations in many countries (Ukraine is an example) could contribute to the spread of the infection too. Here, the change in trends for DCC and DDC values in European countries calculated with 7-day smoothing [10] is indicative. As of 1 September 2021, no correlation versus VC was revealed for DCC values and DDC figures showed a decreasing trend [Reference Nesteruk and Rodionov32], while as of 1 February 2022, DCC showed an increasing trend versus VC and BC (one-per cent increment in VC and BC caused, respectively, 40.9 and 38.7 increase in DCC values; DDC values demonstrated decreasing trends versus VC and BC [Reference Nesteruk and Rodionov33]). CC and DC values accumulated in 15 European countries with the highest testing level from the outbreaks until 1 August 2022 demonstrated no decreasing trends versus VC at the confidence level of 0.05 [Reference Nesteruk and Rodionov17].

Conclusions

The endemic characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infection in 2023 agree with the ones estimated in [Reference Nesteruk9] with the use of 2022 data sets, but lower testing and reporting levels have to be taken into account. The average values of daily deaths per million still can be higher than the upper limit of 0.41 and exceed seasonal influenza mortality.

An increase in the CFRs in 2023 shows that SARS-CoV-2 infection is still dangerous. Since the numbers of COVID-19 cases and deaths per capita in 2022 and 2023 do not demonstrate downward trends with the increase in the percentages of fully vaccinated people and boosters, the vaccination campaign probably was not effective. The reasons may be both rapid mutations of the coronavirus, which reduced the effectiveness of vaccines and led to a large number of re-infections, and inappropriate management.

Data availability statement

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this text.

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful to Robin Thompson, Matt Keeling, Paul Brown, and Oleksii Rodionov for their support and for providing very useful information.

Author contribution

Conceptualization: I.N.; Methodology: I.N.

Competing interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Clarification point

No humans or human data were used during this study.

Funding statement

The study was supported by the INI-LMS Solidarity Programme at the University of Warwick, UK.

References

Tracking of SARS-CoV-2 variants. WHO. Available at https://www.who.int/activities/tracking-SARS-CoV-2-variants (accessed 17 January 2024).Google Scholar
Variants_of_SARS-CoV-2. Wikipedia. Available at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variants_of_SARS-CoV-2 (accessed 17 January 2024).Google Scholar
Variant classifications. CDC. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/variants/variant-classifications.html (accessed 17 January 2024).Google Scholar
Re-infection database. New York State. Available at https://coronavirus.health.ny.gov/covid-19-reinfection-data (accessed 17 January 2024).Google Scholar
Guedes, AR, et al. (2023) Reinfection rate in a cohort of healthcare workers over 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic. Scientific Reports 13, 712. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25908-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flacco, ME, et al. (2022) Risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection 18 months after primary infection: Population-level observational study. Frontiers in Public Health 10, 884121. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.884121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WHO COVID-19 database. WHO. Available at https://covid19.who.int/data (accessed 18 January 2024).Google Scholar
Nesteruk, I (2022) Epidemic waves caused by SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) and pessimistic forecasts of the COVID-19 pandemic duration. MedComm 3, e122. https://doi.org/10.1002/mco2.122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nesteruk, I (2023) Endemic characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Scientific Reports 13, 14841. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41841-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
COVID-19 Data Repository by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU). Available at https://github.com/owid/covid-19-data/tree/master/public/data (accessed 11 December 2023).Google Scholar
WHO epidemiological database. WHO. Available at https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on-covid-19---1-september-2023 (accessed 17 January 2024).Google Scholar
World population. Worldometers. Available at https://www.worldometers.info/world-population (accessed 17 January 2024).Google Scholar
Nesteruk, I (2024) Trends of the COVID-19 dynamics in 2022 and 2023 vs. the population age, testing and vaccination levels. Frontiers in Big Data 6, 1355080. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2023.1355080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paget, J, et al. (2019) Global Seasonal Influenza-associated Mortality Collaborator Network and GLaMOR Collaborating Teams*. Global mortality associated with seasonal influenza epidemics: New burden estimates and predictors from the GLaMOR project. Journal of Global Health 9, 020421. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.09.020421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zero-COVID countries. Wikipedia. Available at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-COVID (accessed 18 January 2024).Google Scholar
Nesteruk, I and Keeling, M (2023) Population age as a key factor in the COVID-19 pandemic dynamics. Research Square. Posted 30 November 2023. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3682693/v1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesteruk, I and Rodionov, O (2022) The COVID-19 pandemic in rich and poor countries. Research Square. Posted 7 December 2022. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2348206/v1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesteruk, I (2022) Vaccination and testing as a means of ending the COVID-19 pandemic: comparative and statistical analysis. MedRxiv. Posted 21 June 2022. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.16.22276531.Google Scholar
Nesteruk, I (2023) Improvement of the software for modeling the dynamics of epidemics and developing a user-friendly interface. Infectious Disease Modelling 8, 806821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idm.2023.06.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fowlkes, AL, et al. (2022) Effectiveness of 2-dose BNT162b2 (Pfizer BioNTech) mRNA vaccine in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection among children aged 5–11 years and adolescents aged 12–15 years-PROTECT cohort, July 2021–February 2022. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 71, 422428. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7111e1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nesteruk, I (2021) Visible and real sizes of new COVID-19 pandemic waves in Ukraine. Innovative Biosystems and Bioengineering 5, 8596. https://doi.org/10.20535/ibb.2021.5.2.230487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COVID-19 testing in Slovakia. Voice of America. Available at https://www.voanews.com/covid-19-pandemic/slovakias-second-round-coronavirus-tests-draws-large-crowds (accessed 17 January 2024).Google Scholar
Nesteruk, I (2021) Influence of possible natural and artificial collective immunity on new COVID-19 pandemic waves in Ukraine and Israel. Exploratory Research and Hypothesis in Medicine 7, 818. https://doi.org/10.14218/ERHM.2021.00044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesteruk, I (2021) The real COVID-19 pandemic dynamics in Qatar in 2021: Simulations, predictions and verifications of the SIR model. Semina: Ciências Exatas e Tecnológicas 42, 5562. https://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semexatas/article/view/43992.Google Scholar
Nesteruk, I (2021) COVID19 Pandemic Dynamics. Singapore: Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6416-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberger, DM, et al. (2020) Estimating the early death toll of COVID-19 in the United States. MEDRXIV, Posted April 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.15.2006643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, NG, et al. (2020) Age-dependent effects in the transmission and control of COVID-19 epidemics. Nature Medicine 26, 12051211. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0962-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Earth population. Database.earth. Available at https://database.earth/population (accessed 30 September 2023).Google Scholar
Median age database. Visual capitalist. Available at https://www.visualcapitalist.com/mapped-the-median-age-of-every-continent/ (accessed 30 September 2023).Google Scholar
Nesteruk, I (2024) Efficacy of vaccinations in the COVID-19 pandemic. Research gate, Posted 12 January 2024. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11465.52327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Influenza database. World Health Rankings. Available at https://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/cause-of-death/influenza-pneumonia/by-country/ (accessed 22 January 2024).Google Scholar
Nesteruk, I and Rodionov, O (2021) Impact of vaccination and testing levels on the dynamics of the COVID-19 pandemic and its cessation. Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences 2, 11411147. https://doi.org/10.37871/jbres1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesteruk, I and Rodionov, O (2022) Omicron waves of the COVID-19 pandemic and efficacy of vaccinations and testing. Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences 3, 588594. https://doi.org/10.37871/jbres1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, D, et al. (2021) The age-standardized incidence, mortality, and case fatality rates of COVID-19 in 79 countries: A cross-sectional comparison and their correlations with associated factors. Epidemiology and Health 43, e2021061. https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2021061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nesteruk, I and Rodionov, O (2022) New COVID-19 pandemic waves caused by omicron and efficiency of vaccinations. Journal of Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences 3, 114139. https://doi.org/10.37871/jbres1410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Accumulated numbers of COVID-19 cases and deaths and population volumes in 2023

Figure 1

Figure 1. Results of calculations (markers) of the average daily numbers of cases DCC (blue) and deaths DDC (black) per million and case fatality risks (CFRs) (red) for three different periods in 2023 and comparison with the values estimated in [9] (dashed lines) and flu mortality (dotted magenta lines). The characteristics, corresponding to the long period (1 January–10 September 2023; T1 = 253 days), are shown by ‘circles’; to the short period (16 May–10 September 2023; T2 = 119 days), by ‘crosses’; and to the last 28 days of 2023, by ‘triangles’.

Figure 2

Table 2. Results of calculations of the average daily numbers of cases and deaths and case fatality rates for two different periods in 2023

Figure 3

Table 3. Trends for accumulated cases (CC) and deaths (DC) per capita and average daily new cases (DCC) and deaths (DDC) per capita vs. percentages of fully vaccinated people (VC) and boosters (BC) in different periods of the COVID-19 pandemic