Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:22:37.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The seroepidemiology of varicella zoster virus among pregnant Bangladeshi and white British women in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2007

Y. S. TALUKDER*
Affiliation:
Centre for Infectious Disease, Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Queen Mary School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
G. KAFATOS
Affiliation:
Statistics Modelling and Bioinformatics Department, Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections, Colindale, London, UK
A. PINOT de MOIRA
Affiliation:
Centre for Infectious Disease, Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Queen Mary School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
J. AQUILINA
Affiliation:
Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London, UK
S. P. PARKER
Affiliation:
Centre for Infectious Disease, Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Queen Mary School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
N. S. CROWCROFT
Affiliation:
Centre for Infections, Health Protection Agency, Colindale, London, UK
D. W. G. BROWN
Affiliation:
Enteric, Respiratory & Neurological Virus Laboratory, Central Public Health Laboratory, Specialist & Reference Microbiology Division, Health Protection Agency Colindale, London, UK
J. BREUER
Affiliation:
Centre for Infectious Disease, Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Queen Mary School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK
*
*Author for correspondence: Ms. Y. S. Talukder, Centre for Infectious Disease, Institute of Cell and Molecular Science, Queen Mary School of Medicine and Dentistry, 4 Newark St, London E1 2AT, UK. (Email: [email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

We investigated the comparative seroepidemiology of varicella zoster virus (VZV) in pregnant women of two ethnic groups, white British and Bangladeshi, living in an inner city area of London, United Kingdom. Women aged 16–45 years were recruited from antenatal clinics of the Royal London Hospital in the Borough of Tower Hamlets. Complete data were obtained from 275 white British and 765 Bangladeshi women. VZV antibody prevalence was 93·1% (95% CI 89·4–95·8) and 86·0% (95% CI 83·3–88·4) respectively. Women who were born in Bangladesh and lived there at least until the age of 15 years had the lowest odds of being immune (OR 0·37, 95% CI 0·22–0·63). This implies they will have an increased risk of varicella during pregnancy. Women arriving in the United Kingdom in adulthood should be screened routinely during pregnancy and vaccination offered postpartum if they are susceptible.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

INTRODUCTION

In the United Kingdom, like other temperate countries, varicella is predominantly a childhood disease and consequently more than 90% of women are immune by childbearing age [Reference Fairley and Miller1]. In many tropical and subtropical countries, however, the average age of varicella infection appears to be higher [Reference Garnett2Reference Lee5]. When looking at the likelihood of chickenpox occurring in pregnancy, the estimated risk in the UK population is 1/2000 deliveries [Reference Nathwani6]. Although most cases are mild, complications include spontaneous abortion, premature labour, varicella pneumonitis, premature delivery and congenital varicella syndrome (CVS) [Reference Enders7Reference Pastuszak9]. The risk of CVS is about 0·4% in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy which increases to 2% between weeks 13–20 [Reference Enders7]. A study in Dublin, Ireland showed that up to 20% of pregnant women from Asia, Africa and Eastern Europe were susceptible to varicella zoster virus (VZV) [Reference Knowles10].

In Bangladesh, the seroprevalence of VZV was just 78% in individuals aged 16–25 years and only reached 85% in the 31–35 years age group [Reference Saha11]. In a preliminary investigation (J. Breuer, unpublished data) in East London, where there is a high proportion of Bangladeshi and other immigrants, it was shown that VZV seroprevalence in pregnant women was lower for the South Asians than white British women. This implied an increased risk of varicella during pregnancy for immigrant women. The main aim of this study was to examine the VZV status in pregnant women who lived in the same area of East London and to test the hypothesis that difference in seroprevalence is due to country of birth and particularly where childhood is spent, rather than racial origin or ethnicity per se. This might provide clues as to whether the higher risk in tropical and sub-tropical countries is due to local environmental factors or to cultural differences which remain after migration. A secondary aim was to identify other risk factors related to chickenpox which could explain the difference in seroprevalence.

METHOD

Study population

The study sample was a subset of the antenatal population of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets whose care is managed by maternity services at the Royal London Hospital. The London Borough of Tower Hamlets has a population in excess of 161 064 (Census 1991). The major ethnic groups are white British (63%) and Bangladeshi (22%). Black Africans and black Caribbeans make up 3·5% and 2·5% respectively. White British and Bangladeshi women were recruited during two separate studies. The first was carried out over a period of 6 months from October 2001 to March 2002 at routine antenatal clinics held in community health centres by midwives in the Tower Hamlets Primary Care Trust (PCT). Busy clinics were selected at random, and all women attending were interviewed. The second study was carried out over a 6-month period from September 2003 to February 2004 in the Obstetric Ultrasound department of the Royal London Hospital. The same sampling selection method was applied as in the first study. Since clinics were very busy and patient lists were produced on the same day, women were interviewed according to the next available woman on the patient list.

Patients were invited to participate by explaining to them the purpose of the study and providing them with a letter of invitation. The first author of this study is bilingual in English and Bengali, and was thus able to provide full verbal and written language support. The questionnaire was administered by the author, after verbal and written consent was given. Women were recruited to the study irrespective of their age and gestation stage. Ethnicity was defined as Bangladeshi if the subject or her parents were born in Bangladesh, and, similarly, as white British if the subject was white and either her or her parents were born in the United Kingdom. This corresponds with the classification of ethnic groups used by the Office of National Statistics for the Census 1991. In this study, ethnicity was assigned by the researcher. Women of other ethnic groups were excluded. Ethical permission for the study was obtained from the East London and City Health Authority (ELCHA) and from PHLS Ethics Committee.

To ensure a representative ethnic sample in the first study, women were recruited from 17 clinics in different areas of Tower Hamlets. Representation was increased in the second study by recruiting in the ultrasound clinic, which is attended by all women booked to deliver at St Bartholomews and the London Hospitals. For both studies interview procedures were modified to maximize the recruitment of women. Thus, wherever possible the midwife introduced the interviewer and asked the woman whether she wished to participate. The response rates among women of both ethnic groups and the relationship between agreeing to participate and the mode of study introduction were noted. The numbers of women booked into each ultrasound clinic precluded recruitment of all those attending. To assess recruitment bias due to refusal, the age and ethnic characteristics of women recruited and not recruited were compared.

Serology

Subjects were asked for permission to access a sample of their serum, which had been taken previously, or would be taken for the management of their pregnancy during their first midwife visit. Sera were stored at −20°C until they were tested. Serum samples were tested by Behring VZV IgG ELISA (Dade Behring, Marburg, Germany) in the first study and by Diamedix VZV IgG ELISA (Diamedix Corp., Miami, FL, USA) in the second, as the latter was better suited for processing larger batches. The manufacturers quote specificity and sensitivity as 100% and 99·3% for Behring and 96% and 98% for Diamedix.

Questionnaire and data collection

To test the main hypothesis, the following information was sought from subjects: date of birth, ethnicity, country of birth, whether subjects had lived outside the United Kingdom for ⩾1 year before the age of 15 years, and if so, which country lived in and year of entry into the United Kimgdom. Since varicella is most common in children aged about 1–10 years in the United Kingdom [Reference Thomas, Wheeler and Hall12, Reference Vyse13], exposure to children aged 1–10 years was used as a surrogate for exposure to varicella following the example of Thomas et al. [Reference Thomas, Wheeler and Hall12]. The questionnaire also asked for information on the patient's history of chickenpox, and various risk factors such as patient's preschool attendance (i.e. aged <5 years) of day-care or nursery, number of siblings, birth order, preschool attendance of any siblings, siblings' history of chickenpox whilst living in the same household, number of own children, and other children aged <10 years living in same household, history of chickenpox in the children, own children attending preschool, previous/current employment, birth order of expected child and any previous/current profession involving school or preschool children. If a subject's job involved working with children, details were obtained to establish if they had ‘significant’ contact with children, based on the definition of a ‘significant’ exposure to VZV in the Immunization Handbook (HMSO, 1996). Contact in the same room (house or classroom) for a significant period (⩾15 min) and face-to-face contact (e.g. while having a conversation) were considered significant. The questionnaire was piloted in the first 10 recruits to assess its suitability to the target population. The data generated by the questionnaire and results of the ELISAs were entered into Epi-Info version 6 (CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA).

Sample size

Sample size calculations were based on the lower expected seroprevalence group, i.e. Bangladeshi women (J. Breuer, unpublished data). For the initial study in 2002, the sample size was calculated assuming 80% VZV seroprevalence among Bangladeshis and 90% seroprevalence among white British women; at 5% significance and a power of 80%, with an additional 20% for multivariable analysis, this gave a required sample size of 250 in each ethnic group. Second sample size calculations using seroprevalence estimates obtained from the 2002 study (95% and 90% amongst UK- and Bangladesh-born women respectively), but the same level of significance and power gave a required sample size of 700 Bangladesh-born and 350 UK-born women (with a ratio of two unexposed to one exposed).

Standardizing test results

As different serological assays were used to test samples collected in 2002 and 2004, the datasets could not be directly merged unless the results were standardized. This was done by re-estimating the positive/negative cut-off using mixture modelling. This method is described in detail by Gay [Reference Gay14]. Initially, the quantitative assay results (OD) were transformed to the log10 scale and censored results (reported as 0) were assigned to half the detection limit of the assay (there were nine such results for 2002 and two for 2004) [Reference Kafatos, Andrews and Nardone15, Reference Lubin16]. Data were assumed to follow two normal distributions, one for negative and one for positive results. Using mixture modelling, the estimates were calculated by maximum-likelihood methods.

In brief, let n i be the frequency in one of i=1, 2, …, 57 serum categories and λi be the expected count of that category. Then the maximum-likelihood estimates can be calculated by minimizing the deviance D, i.e. the difference between the likelihood of the fitted model (L C) and the likelihood of the full model, i.e. when n ii (L F). The deviance for this model is given by [Reference Lubin16]

The optimal cut-off point was then estimated to minimize the discrepancy between the specificity and sensitivity on the panel based on the model estimates [Reference Gay14]. Microsoft Excel 2000 was used for the mixture modelling.

Data manipulation and statistical analysis

After the cut-offs of the two tests were estimated, the results were re-classified according to these instead of the manufacturers' cut-offs. The datasets were then merged as there was no indication of potential selection bias. The initial analysis was carried out on the whole eligible population but subsequent analyses were subject to three further exclusion criteria: (1) white British who lived abroad for >1 year; (2) UK-born Bangladeshis who lived abroad for >1 year; and (3) those born in Bangladesh who lived there for <1 year.

A variable combining ethnicity, country of birth and country of childhood was defined as the main exposure of interest. This variable had four levels (white UK-born, UK-born Bangladeshi, Bangladesh-born immigrated to the United Kingdom as a child, i.e. aged ⩽15 years or as an adult, i.e. aged >15 years).

Single variable analysis was carried out using a logistic regression model with VZV IgG status positive or negative as the outcome with an association criterion at the 10% level. To show any potential difference between different levels of the exposure variable a multivariable model was fitted adjusting only for age and ethnicity using a stricter association criterion of P<0·05. One variable at a time was added into the model and tested for evidence of association trying to determine if any other variables influenced the exposure variable. Once a variable was found to be significant, it was included in the model in a stepwise fashion until no other variables than the ones already in the model showed significant association. Factors highly collinear with immune status (siblings' varicella history and household exposure to varicella) were not included in the analysis. ‘Lived abroad for a year or more’ and ‘years lived abroad’ were collinear to ethnicity and were thus not included. Finally, single and multivariable analyses were carried out only for the Bangladesh-born women. stata version 8.2 was used for the statistical analysis (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).

RESULTS

In total, 502 women were invited to participate in the first study (2002), of whom 467 (93%) agreed to participate. Of these 151 were white British, 272 Bangladeshi and 44 of other ethnicity). Response rates for this study were 96% and 92% amongst Bangladeshi and white British women respectively, response rates were generally higher if a midwife was present to introduce the interviewer to the subject (96%) than if the subject was approached directly (89%). Serum samples were available for 439 (94%). In the second study, 976 women in the obstetric ultrasound clinic and maternal assessment unit were invited to participate, i.e. about 20% of women attending the clinic that day. Of these 898 women, 151 white British, 563 Bangladeshi and 184 of other ethnicity took part and 78 refused. The response rate for Bangladeshi women was 92% and for white British women 95·6%, with an overall response rate of 92%. Serum samples were available for 813 (90·4%) of the women in the second study. Forty-six and 164 women interviewed during the 2002 and 2004 studies respectively were either from another country or ethnicity than the ones of interest and so were excluded.

Mixture modelling

There were 439 samples from 2002 and 813 samples from 2004 available for mixture modelling. The 2-normal distribution fitted the data well for both datasets=[deviance=26·6 (d.f.=434) and 44·2 (d.f.=808) for 2002 and 2004 respectively]. The observed and fitted models are shown in Figure 1. The estimated optimal cut-off point was 1·68 on the log10 scale, i.e. 48·2 mIU/ml for the 2002 dataset (Behring VZV IgG ELISA), and 1·18 on the log10 scale, i.e. 15·2 EU/ml for 2004 (Diamedix VZV IgG ELISA). The mixture model-estimated sensitivity and specificity were for each 100·0% for 2002, and 100% and 99·8% respectively for 2004.

Fig. 1. Observed (–◊–) and fitted (–■–) distributions of VZV IgG ELISA results. (a) 2002 data: Behring ELISA (antibody titres, mIU/ml). (b) 2004 data: Diamedix ELISA (ELISA units, or EU/ml).

Population characteristics

Complete questionnaire data and IgG results were available for 275 white British and 765 Bangladeshi women (Table 1). The mean age of white British women was 28±6·4 years, with about 47% of women expecting their first child, the average number of siblings was two, and 87% attended preschool or day care before age 5 years (or their sibling attended). The mean age of Bangladeshi women born in the United Kingdom was 24±4·5 years and for Bangladesh-born women it was 26±5 years; 50% and 33% respectively were expecting their first child, 95% and 34% attended nursery or had a sibling that attended nursery in their childhood. There was high correlation between Bangladesh-born women and living abroad for >1 year: 95% answered ‘yes’ compared to 11% UK-born Bangladeshi and 3% white British women. Bangladeshi women who lived abroad for ⩾1 year resided in Bangladesh. By contrast most white British women who lived abroad for ⩾1 year lived in Europe, North America or Australia. There was high correlation for the questions relating to them or a sibling attending nursery and ‘previous/current employment’ with being white British or UK-born Bangladeshi.

Table 1. Characteristics of the study population

Risk factors for VZV infection

Immunity was strongly associated with being born in the United Kingdom (P<0·001) and with ethnicity (P=0·001), and these factors are highly correlated. In 1040 subjects, 93·1% white British women were seropositive, compared to 95·2% UK-born Bangladeshi women and 84·6% Bangladesh-born women. Seroprevalence at every age group was lower in women born in Bangladesh (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Percentage of pregnant women immune to VZV by ethnicity and country of birth, stratified by age.

To analyse the main variable of interest (‘country of birth and childhood’) 51 subjects were excluded because they were born in the United Kingdom but lived abroad for >1 year, or were Bangladesh-born but lived there for <1 year, leaving a subset of 989 individuals.

Single variable analysis on all the women combined showed that several factors were significant at the 10% level (Table 2). Being born and raised in Bangladesh, living there for more than a year, and years lived abroad, were associated with lower immunity. Age, siblings with varicella history, subject/sibling attending nursery, having a child who attended nursery, household exposure to varicella (as an adult), previous/current employment, health of children at work were associated with increased immunity.

Table 2. Single variable analysis of risk factors of VZV infection in the study population (n=989)

* Fisher's exact test.

The logistic regression model showed that Bangladesh-born women who entered the United Kingdom aged >15 years were significantly less likely to be immune to varicella during pregnancy (OR 0·37, 95% CI 0·22–0·63) than the white UK-born women. For Bangladesh-born women arriving in the United Kingdom as children (⩽15 years) (OR 0·60, 95% CI 0·33–1·10) and UK-born Bangladeshi women (OR 2·09, 95% CI 0·68, 6·37) the difference was not significant. One variable at a time was added to the model including age and ethnicity. Only one variable was found to be significant following multivariable analysis. This was ‘previous/current employment’ (OR 1·84, 95% CI 1·13–3·02).

Single variable analysis on Bangladesh-born women only (Table 3) showed that, arriving in the United Kingdom aged >15 years was associated with increased susceptibility. Age, a history of varicella in siblings, subject/sibling attending nursery, own child attended nursery, household exposure to varicella as an adult, and previous/current employment were significantly associated with immunity to chickenpox. No independent risk factor was found in multivariate analysis.

Table 3. Single variable analysis of risk factors in 660 Bangladeshi women born in Bangladesh

* Fisher's exact test.

DISCUSSION

A biological difference determining VZV susceptibility between ethnic groups has been proposed previously [Reference Dworkin17, Reference Schmader18]. This study has shown decisively that country of birth and country in which childhood is spent, rather than ethnicity on its own determine VZV immunity in adult women. We therefore conclude that environment and exposure alone determine late-onset chickenpox in adults from the tropics. Social factors are liable to dominate the patterns of transmission in all countries. For example, in UK-born children the average age at infection for VZV has fallen in recent years because a greater proportion of children attend nursery [Reference Brisson19].

This is the first study to investigate differences in VZV seroprevalence in the United Kingdom in women of different ethnic origin and their risk factors for VZV susceptibility. Being born in Bangladesh was strongly associated with susceptibility. Furthermore, when taking into account the age of immigration from Bangladesh to the United Kingdom, women living there into adulthood had the lowest odds of being immune (OR 0·37, 95% CI 0·22–0·63). Almost 19% of Bangladeshi women (who were born and lived in Bangladesh until after age 15 years) were susceptible to VZV compared to 6% of white British women. There was no significant difference between white UK-born women, Bangladeshi UK-born and women who moved to the United Kingdom in their childhood (i.e. aged ⩽15 years) in multivariable analysis.

Residents in tropical countries such as India, Sri Lanka, South East Asia and the Caribbean have a higher mean age of infection as well as much lower seroprevalence in adults and adolescents compared to those of temperate countries [Reference Lee5, Reference Lokeshwar20Reference Venkitaraman and John22]. The mean age of infection was 23 years in a study in rural India [Reference Sinha23], and 38·3 years in the Caribbean [Reference Garnett2] compared to 6 years in Germany [Reference Wagenpfeil24]. Environmental factors such as interference by other childhood viruses prevalent in tropical, usually less developed countries [Reference Sinha23] and high temperatures are thought to interfere with virus transmission [Reference Garnett2, Reference Venkitaraman and John22, Reference Lolekha25, Reference White26]. Generally, VZV transmission is less efficient than some other viruses, e.g. measles, which has a secondary attack rate of 71% compared to 61% for VZV [Reference Hope-Simpson27].

Single variable analysis showed several risk factors, including age, associated with seronegativity in Bangladesh-born women living in the United Kingdom. They were less likely to be immune if they were younger and if they arrived as adults after the age of 15 years; susceptibility was higher if their siblings had not had chickenpox when they were children. They were less likely to be immune if they had not been exposed, in adulthood, to chickenpox in their own home or to other households' children; and if their children had not attended nursery. This suggests that children within the family are an important source of infection for these adult women, a situation reminiscent of rubella and parvovirus B19 in parous women [Reference Enders, Miller, Gershon and Arvin28]. On the other hand, UK-born women were predominantly immune and the risk factors considered did not show any association with immunity. Risk factors could not be assessed in UK-born Bangladeshi women due to insufficient sample size; only 8/105 of these women were aged >30 years, accounting for the apparent drop in seroprevalence in this age group.

Socio-economic status can be a confounder when comparing ethnic groups [Reference Sheldon and Parker29, Reference McKenzie and Crowcroft30]. In our study population, UK-born women had significant differences with Bangladesh-born women, particularly in two indicators of socio-economic status. Nursery attendance in early childhood and having employment were associated with being born in the United Kingdom. Employment was significantly associated with immunity both in single and multivariable analysis, suggesting that social and behavioural differences, some of which we could not measure, play a role in the observed increased susceptibility among Bangladesh-born women.

The subjects in this study were recruited on two occasions 2 years apart and their sera tested with two different although reliable assays. However, this is not a limitation since mixture modelling was used to re-estimate the positive/negative cut-off values for this study which gave standardized results. This enabled us to overcome the problems of this study, but the manufacturers' cut-off criteria should be used for diagnosis.

Susceptibility to VZV was almost three times higher in pregnant women born in Bangladesh placing them at greater risk of infection in pregnancy compared to UK-born women. The findings here probably extend to the diverse immigrant population from other tropical, sub-tropical, Afro-Caribbean and Eastern European countries with lower VZV antibody prevalence. Potentially harmful outbreaks of chickenpox have been reported in similar immigrant communities [Reference Hastie3, Reference Kjersem and Jepsen4, Reference Gershon31, Reference Longfield32]. Adult varicella is a severe disease with mortality over 4000 times greater than that in children [Reference Miller, Marshall and Vurdien33]. Should infection occur during pregnancy, the potential consequences for the unborn child include severe neonatal varicella and CVS. Given these risks, it is essential and probably cost-effective to offer VZV screening and postpartum vaccination of susceptibles to immigrant women [Reference Pinot de Moira, Edmunds and Breuer34].

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr Gubby Ayida, Clinical Director of Maternity services, at the time, for permission to carry out the study in the antenatal clinics; Mai Buckley and Denise Mcenenie, managers of Maternity and Midwifery services for advice; all the community midwives and Bengali advocates who helped with recruitment and made the study possible; Sarah Thomas, London School of Hygiene for help formulating the questionnaire; Brigid Whitehand at the ultrasound clinic for technical assistance; Rachael Nugent for VZV testing; Margaret at Maternal-Fetal assessment for help with recruitment. Funding for the first study and for Yamima Talukder was provided by a PHLS-MRC studentship; the second study was funded by Sanofi-Pasteur. Judith Breuer received research grants from Wellcome and Sanofi-Pasteur.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

None.

References

REFERENCES

1. Fairley, CK, Miller, E. Varicella-zoster virus epidemiology – a changing scene? Journal of Infectious Diseases 1996; 174 (Suppl. 3): S314S319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Garnett, GP, et al. The age of infection with varicella-zoster virus in St Lucia, West Indies. Epidemiology and Infection 1993; 110: 361372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Hastie, I. Varicella-zoster virus affecting immigrant nurses. Lancet 1980; 2: 154155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Kjersem, H, Jepsen, S. Varicella among immigrants from the Tropics, a health problem. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine 1990; 18: 171174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Lee, B. Review of varicella zoster seroepidemiology in India and Southeast Asia. Tropical Medicine and International Health 1998; 3: 886890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Nathwani, D, et al. Varicella infections in pregnancy and the newborn. A review prepared for the UK Advisory Group on Chickenpox on behalf of the British Society for the Study of Infection. Journal of Infection 1998; 36 (Suppl. 1): 5971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Enders, G, et al. Consequences of varicella and herpes zoster in pregnancy: prospective study of 1739 cases. Lancet 1994; 343: 15481551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Paryani, SG, Arvin, AM. Intrauterine infection with varicella-zoster virus after maternal varicella. New England Journal of Medicine 1986; 314: 15421546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Pastuszak, AL, et al. Outcome after maternal varicella infection in the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. New England Journal of Medicine 1994; 330: 901905.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Knowles, SJ, et al. Susceptibility to infectious rash illness in pregnant women from diverse geographical regions. Communicable Disease and Public Health 2004; 7: 344348.Google ScholarPubMed
11. Saha, SK, et al. Seroepidemiology of varicella-zoster virus in Bangladesh. Annals of Tropical Paediatrics 2002; 22: 341345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Thomas, S, Wheeler, J, Hall, A. Contacts with varicella or with children and protection against herpes zoster in adults: a case-control study. Lancet 2002; 360: 678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Vyse, AJ, et al. Seroprevalence of antibody to varicella zoster virus in England and Wales in children and young adults. Epidemiology and Infection 2004; 132: 11291134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Gay, NJ. Analysis of serological surveys using mixture models: application to a survey of parvovirus B19. Statistics in Medicine 1996; 15: 15671573.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Kafatos, G, Andrews, N, Nardone, A. Model selection methodology for inter-laboratory standardisation of antibody titres. Vaccine 2005; 23: 50225027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Lubin, JH, et al. Epidemiologic evaluation of measurement data in the presence of detection limits. Environmental Health Perspective 2004; 112: 16911696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Dworkin, RH. Racial differences in herpes zoster and age at onset of varicella. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1996; 174: 239241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Schmader, K, et al. Racial differences in the occurrence of herpes zoster. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1995; 171: 701704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19. Brisson, M, et al. Epidemiology of varicella zoster virus infection in Canada and the United Kingdom. Epidemiology and Infection 2001; 127: 305314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Lokeshwar, MR, et al. Age related seroprevalence of antibodies to varicella in India. Indian Pediatrics 2000; 37: 714719.Google ScholarPubMed
21. Maretic, Z, Cooray, MP. Comparisons between chickenpox in a tropical and a European country. Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 1963; 66: 311315.Google Scholar
22. Venkitaraman, AR, John, TJ. Chicken pox outbreak in staff and students of a hospital in the tropics. Lancet 1982; 2: 165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Sinha, DP. Chickenpox – a disease predominantly affecting adults in rural West Bengal, India. International Journal of Epidemiology 1976; 5: 367374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Wagenpfeil, S, et al. Empirical data on the varicella situation in Germany for vaccination decisions. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 2004; 10: 425430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Lolekha, S, et al. Effect of climatic factors and population density on varicella zoster virus epidemiology within a tropical country. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2001; 64: 131136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. White, E. Chickenpox in Kerala. Indian Journal of Public Health 1978; 22: 141151.Google ScholarPubMed
27. Hope-Simpson, RE. Infectiousness of communicable diseases in the household (measles, chickenpox, and mumps). Lancet 1952; 2: 549554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Enders, G, Miller, EM. Varicella and herpes zoster in pregnancy and the newborn. In: Gershon, A, Arvin, AM eds. Varicella Zoster Virus: Virology and Clinical Management. Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 317395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Sheldon, TA, Parker, H. Race and ethnicity in health research. Journal of Public Health and Medicine 1992; 14: 104110.Google ScholarPubMed
30. McKenzie, KJ, Crowcroft, NS. Race, ethnicity, culture, and science. British Medical Journal 1994; 309: 286287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Gershon, AA, et al. Antibody to Varicella-Zoster virus in parturient women and their offspring during the first year of life. Pediatrics 1976; 58: 692696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Longfield, JN, et al. Varicella outbreaks in Army recruits from Puerto Rico. Varicella susceptibility in a population from the tropics. Archives of Internal Medicine 1990; 150: 970973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Miller, E, Marshall, R, Vurdien, J. Epidemiology, outcome and control of varicella-zoster infection. Reviews in Medical Microbiology 1993; 4: 222230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Pinot de Moira, A, Edmunds, WJ, Breuer, J. The cost-effectiveness of antenatal varicella screening with post-partum vaccination of susceptibles. Vaccine 2006; 24: 12981307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Observed (–◊–) and fitted (–■–) distributions of VZV IgG ELISA results. (a) 2002 data: Behring ELISA (antibody titres, mIU/ml). (b) 2004 data: Diamedix ELISA (ELISA units, or EU/ml).

Figure 1

Table 1. Characteristics of the study population

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Percentage of pregnant women immune to VZV by ethnicity and country of birth, stratified by age.

Figure 3

Table 2. Single variable analysis of risk factors of VZV infection in the study population (n=989)

Figure 4

Table 3. Single variable analysis of risk factors in 660 Bangladeshi women born in Bangladesh